John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 28,982
- 15,073
- 1,288
No, Oddball, not 'just once more, please.' No.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pussy ^ says what?No, Oddball, not 'just once more, please.' No.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degreeThe criminal statute I just literal copy and pasted from a legal site is not illegal?!?! are you high?
You're trying way too hard. The charges were brought. Like it or not. Agree or not. They are real statutes and crimes. You can believe that the evidence doesn't support the crimes and if 1 jury member agrees then Trump won't be found guilty.No act at all. Unlike you, I’m being honest.
The scumbag persecuted used the words “may include.”
Obviously, a tainted pussy like you cannot admit that his use of the term “may” entails that it may not.
Is there some reason that he declines to just say it?
Well, yes. There is. But that eludes simpletons like you, too.
I literally just explained it all... The charge and the "other". I can't help you any more if you still don't understand.No. it’s not. You’re still pretending that the pussy Bragg ever sacked up and spelled it out. He didn’t. Ever.
To this very moment.
Three other crimes as I wrote a few posts ago: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursementYou are deliberately evading the question of what that “other” crime allegedly is.
You’re a coward, slack.
I can and I have multiple times... I'll do it again... This is a REAL crime:Nobody could and nobody has.... the dems are prosecuting a former president and leading candidate for the GOP and the crime if it even is a crime is so vague that its laughable....
That's the point when you clowns have to spell out the crime you sound ridiculous and you know it so all you say is read the indictment...
... and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commitI can and I have multiple times... I'll do it again... This is a REAL crime:
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Trumps intent to conceal the crime is what the trial is about. They are showing the payment made by Cohen and the 11 checks Trump made out to pay him back. Concealed to look like retainer payments for legal purposes.A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Where is the intent of any fraud or concealment of a crime?
Can you read plain fucking English?
You're trying way too hard.
The charges were brought.
Like it or not. Agree or not.
They are real statutes and crimes.
Wrong again. If only 1 member disagrees with the other jurors, it’s a hung jury. Not an acquittal you fucking ignorant dumbass.You can believe that the evidence doesn't support the crimes and if 1 jury member agrees then Trump won't be found guilty.
No pretending. There is no crime properly charged and you cannot point to a single thing said by the persecution that alleges what the supposed “other” crime is. Without that hypothetical (but unreferenced) “other” crime, this would be a mere misdemeanor which would be time barred.But all this pretending like there isn't a crime just makes you sound like a moron
YouI can and I have multiple times... I'll do it again... This is a REAL crime:
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Trumps intent to conceal the crime is what the trial is about. They are showing the payment made by Cohen and the 11 checks Trump made out to pay him back. Concealed to look like retainer payments for legal purposes.
I know you think youre onto something but you really aren't... The legal citation was what Trump was charged with. It doesn't refute anything else that I've said.You just posted the legal citation that refuted your claim.
You're too fucking dumb to know how dumb you are.
Thats exactly how you waive the white flag on a debate. Abandon the arguments and resort to meaningless insults. I'd say good game but it was rather pathetically played. Do better next time.You
are
a
fucking
blithering
idiot
I'm sorry the comprehension skills of a 12-year old are beyond you.I know you think youre onto something but you really aren't... The legal citation was what Trump was charged with. It doesn't refute anything else that I've said.
Yup, and I then listed those other crimes. Do you need to see them again?... and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Fucking sub-moron.
No. You didn’t . You established only that you cannot cite anything said by the persecution which tells anyone what their claim is concerning the “other” crime.I literally just explained it all... The charge and the "other". I can't help you any more if you still don't understand.