What Is The Flaw In This Sentence?

[g5000]

Judge strikes restrictions on "morning-after" pill

The morning after pill must now be made available to females under the age of 17 without a prescription, and without their parents' knowledge.

Currently, only women age 17 or older can obtain emergency contraception pills without a prescription. Point-of-sale restrictions require that all women present identification to a pharmacist before obtaining the drug.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Edward Korman said the FDA's rejection of requests to remove age restrictions was "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable."

The Center for Reproductive Rights has given two thumbs up to this judicial ruling.

See if you can find what is wrong in the sentence I bolded:

Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, hailed the ruling. "Women all over the country will no longer face arbitrary delays and barriers just to get emergency contraception," she said

 

[martybegan]

Judge strikes restrictions on "morning-after" pill

The morning after pill must now be made available to females under the age of 17 without a prescription, and without their parents' knowledge.

Currently, only women age 17 or older can obtain emergency contraception pills without a prescription. Point-of-sale restrictions require that all women present identification to a pharmacist before obtaining the drug.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Edward Korman said the FDA's rejection of requests to remove age restrictions was "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable."

The Center for Reproductive Rights has given two thumbs up to this judicial ruling.

See if you can find what is wrong in the sentence I bolded:

Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, hailed the ruling. "Women all over the country will no longer face arbitrary delays and barriers just to get emergency contraception," she said

Why do reproductive centered issues take precedence over either doctor input or parental input? If we want to keep the parents out of it make the age of majority 14 and be done with it.

 

[g5000]

A 14 year old is not a woman. That is the flaw in the idiot's statement about "women" no longer having to face barriers. Actual women have not had any such barriers. They have been able to get the drug OTC without a prescription. So this ruling has nothing to do with them. Therefore, when the asshole says "women" have had the barriers removed, she is talking about children.

Christ, she may as well have said, "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"!

The judge said banning children from this drug was "capricious and arbitrary". What a stupid fuck. It is no different than the drinking age, which is also arbitrary. Is he going to overrule that, too?

 

[Ravi]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

 

[martybegan]

A 14 year old is not a woman. That is the flaw in the idiot's statement about "women" no longer having to face barriers. Actual women have not had any such barriers. They have been able to get the drug OTC without a prescription. So this ruling has nothing to do with them. Therefore, when the asshole says "women" have had the barriers removed, she is talking about children.

Christ, she may as well have said, "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"!

The judge said banning children from this drug was "capricious and arbitrary". What a stupid fuck. It is no different than the drinking age, which is also arbitrary. Is he going to overrule that, too?

Its rule by the exception. Just because "some" girls (thats what they are) may be too afraid to go to a doctor or thier parents, and thus be inconvinenced, the judge decided anyone can have access to these drugs.

Once you are 18, anything goes. If they want to make that a lower age they should lower the age of majority to be consistent.

 

[Unkotare]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Then why are there statutory rape laws?

 

[nodoginnafight]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Then why are there statutory rape laws?

ewwww ... he shoots ..... he SCORES!

 

[Caroljo]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Then why are there statutory rape laws?

 

[jknowgood]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

No society and people like yourself thinks having a morale society is wrong. A fourteen year old girl shouldn't be putting something in her body that will kill a living being in her body. My goodness her body is still maturing. So I guess if she smokes a joint, she all of a sudden a woman? Ya'll people are nuts.

 

[martybegan]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Then why are there statutory rape laws?

 

[nodoginnafight]

IMHO: This is just one more surrender flag. Our society has surrendered in the effort to control our carnal instincts. We are beginning to view any efforts to master our carnal instincts as inevitable failures.

Our ability to apply logic and ethics to master our instincts and defer gratification is what seperates us from livestock. Do we really think that behaving like sharks with legs is the way to live a fulfilling life?

If that is what we are surrendering to, then we might as well fire all of the nukes at once. The human race isn't worth saving.

 

[g5000]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Bullshit. Not even close.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, eh? So you don't mind 50 year old men humping 13 year olds?

The ability to produce sperm or ovulate is not what makes someone an adult. The brain of a child has not developed the judgement centers to maturity. This is scientific fact. A child is literally incapable of the judgmental abilities of an adult. That is why a parent needs to be involved in their decisions.

A fifty year old can run circles around a kid mentally.

We don't let kids get tattoos without parental consent, but we are going to let them get contraceptive medication without it?

 

[bripat9643]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Then 11-year-olds should be allowed to marry, eh Einstein?

 

[Pogo]

A 14 year old is not a woman. That is the flaw in the idiot's statement about "women" no longer having to face barriers. Actual women have not had any such barriers. They have been able to get the drug OTC without a prescription. So this ruling has nothing to do with them. Therefore, when the asshole says "women" have had the barriers removed, she is talking about children.

Christ, she may as well have said, "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"!

The judge said banning children from this drug was "capricious and arbitrary". What a stupid fuck. It is no different than the drinking age, which is also arbitrary. Is he going to overrule that, too?

Well, that's technically true. Why do you think the traditional colour of nail polish is red, and starts going on at that age?

Really, you're this worked up over the semantics between "women" and "girls"? A bit over the top, don't you think? I'm a pretty good proofreader and I came in to find the "flaw" and came up empty.

Erleichda already.

 

[peach174]

Then they wonder why so many 11,12,13 14 year olds are having sex.
It's because of stupid people like this Judge, who just gave young teens the freedom to have sex without any consequences or responsibility.

 

[g5000]

A 14 year old is not a woman. That is the flaw in the idiot's statement about "women" no longer having to face barriers. Actual women have not had any such barriers. They have been able to get the drug OTC without a prescription. So this ruling has nothing to do with them. Therefore, when the asshole says "women" have had the barriers removed, she is talking about children.

Christ, she may as well have said, "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"!

The judge said banning children from this drug was "capricious and arbitrary". What a stupid fuck. It is no different than the drinking age, which is also arbitrary. Is he going to overrule that, too?

Well, that's technically true. Why do you think the traditional colour of nail polish is red, and starts going on at that age?

Really, you're this worked up over the semantics between "women" and "girls"? A bit over the top, don't you think? I'm a pretty good proofreader and I came in to find the "flaw" and came up empty.

Erleichda already.

It betrays the mindset at work. If the issue was about making it legal for a 50 year old to screw a 13 year old, you would notice right away if someone was referring to the 13 year old girls and saying, "women will no longer have to face barriers".

 

[Pogo]

A 14 year old is not a woman. That is the flaw in the idiot's statement about "women" no longer having to face barriers. Actual women have not had any such barriers. They have been able to get the drug OTC without a prescription. So this ruling has nothing to do with them. Therefore, when the asshole says "women" have had the barriers removed, she is talking about children.

Christ, she may as well have said, "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"!

The judge said banning children from this drug was "capricious and arbitrary". What a stupid fuck. It is no different than the drinking age, which is also arbitrary. Is he going to overrule that, too?

Well, that's technically true. Why do you think the traditional colour of nail polish is red, and starts going on at that age?

Really, you're this worked up over the semantics between "women" and "girls"? A bit over the top, don't you think? I'm a pretty good proofreader and I came in to find the "flaw" and came up empty.

Erleichda already.

It betrays the mindset at work. If the issue was about making it legal for a 50 year old to screw a 13 year old, you would notice right away if someone was referring to 13 year old girls as "women who no longer have to face barriers".

You're conflating biology and morality. The fact that a woman/girl/female starts menstruating has nothing to do with 50-year-olds. Lighten up already. It's a freaking word.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

biology collides with legislation

If she needs contraception she is technically a woman.

Bullshit. Not even close.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, eh? So you don't mind 50 year old men humping 13 year olds?

The ability to produce sperm or ovulate is not what makes someone an adult. The brain of a child has not developed the judgement centers to maturity. This is scientific fact. A child is literally incapable of the judgmental abilities of an adult. That is why a parent needs to be involved in their decisions.

A fifty year old can run circles around a kid mentally.

We don't let kids get tattoos without parental consent, but we are going to let them get contraceptive medication without it?

Or maybe a girl of 14 will have sex with a 14 year old boy. Or 17 year old young man. Statutory rape is beside the point.

The fertilized egg isn't even a fetus yet while the morning after pill is effective. Now the girl can avoid an abortion. Don't we all want abortions to be rare? Teenagers WILL have sex whether they have access to emergency contraceptives or not. At least this way there may be fewer abortions.

Quit being deluded puritans.

 

[Freemason9]

A 14 year old is not a woman. That is the flaw in the idiot's statement about "women" no longer having to face barriers. Actual women have not had any such barriers. They have been able to get the drug OTC without a prescription. So this ruling has nothing to do with them. Therefore, when the asshole says "women" have had the barriers removed, she is talking about children.

Christ, she may as well have said, "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"!

The judge said banning children from this drug was "capricious and arbitrary". What a stupid fuck. It is no different than the drinking age, which is also arbitrary. Is he going to overrule that, too?

The problem is that there are some parents unwise enough to force a 14 year-old girl to carry a pregnancy to term. Laws sometimes must be created to protect society from its dumbest and most cruel elements.

 

[boedicca]

The government doesn't allow parents to give their children peanut butter sandwiches in their school lunches...but it's okay for children to get drugs from the government without the parents' knowledge.

Go figure.