What possible reason would ISIS have to piss off Russia?

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,045
Doesn't make any sense. But apparently, and I notice, long after the fact, all this evidence of ISIS involvement and a bombing of a Russian airliner is in the news. Where was all the 'chatter' and intercepts BEFORE the incident? Not hard to manufacture evidence after something happens. And it wouldn't be like, the first time in history a government with a desire to do something blamed somebody else (Hitler and the radio station for example.)

Russia's been bombing the crap out of ISIS' enemies. What possible reason would they have to force Putin to attack them in response to their murdering over 200 of his citizens?

Makes sense the rebels the US loves so much did it, being they're the ones Russia's bombing. And makes even more sense that if this is in fact the case, that the US, UK, and others would create a false flag story to blame ISIS instead of the rebels they're supporting now wouldn't it?
 
Ticking off Russia is no where near their goal...

... they want to run Russia out of Syria...

... like the mujahadeen ran Russia outta Afghanistan.
 
Ticking off Russia is no where near their goal...

... they want to run Russia out of Syria...

... like the mujahadeen ran Russia outta Afghanistan.

Russia was the enemy of my enemy attacking ISIS' opposition. Makes a lot of sense the rebels Russia's been dropping bombs on would bring down a Russian plane. Makes no sense for ISIS to have done it. And since those rebels are the US' allies, makes sense for us to concoct this false flag scenario where it was ISIS and not the rebels we're supporting.
 
ISIS is an enemy to Assad and Putin has been bombing them as well. Expect some nasty payback coming soon.
 
Makes a lot of sense the rebels Russia's been dropping bombs on would bring down a Russian plane.

Actually the group in Sinai were originally al-Qaida...

... then they switched their alleigence to ISIS.
 
Doesn't make any sense. But apparently, and I notice, long after the fact, all this evidence of ISIS involvement and a bombing of a Russian airliner is in the news. Where was all the 'chatter' and intercepts BEFORE the incident? Not hard to manufacture evidence after something happens. And it wouldn't be like, the first time in history a government with a desire to do something blamed somebody else (Hitler and the radio station for example.)

Russia's been bombing the crap out of ISIS' enemies. What possible reason would they have to force Putin to attack them in response to their murdering over 200 of his citizens?

Makes sense the rebels the US loves so much did it, being they're the ones Russia's bombing. And makes even more sense that if this is in fact the case, that the US, UK, and others would create a false flag story to blame ISIS instead of the rebels they're supporting now wouldn't it?
because they are infidels? you dont get radical islam do you? they want everyone to beeither muslim or dead.
 
ISIS ain't exactly rational .

Russia has also been not so nice to the Muslims in thier country . Doesn't take much to get on ISIS enemy list .
 
Russia's been bombing the crap out of ISIS' enemies. What possible reason would they have to force Putin to attack them in response to their murdering over 200 of his citizens?

Apparently you've mistaken ISIS for rational actors, one would have thought that all the indiscriminate rape, pillage and burn they've been doing would have given away the fact that they aren't. They've made it pretty clear that they really aren't concerned with what country an infidel hails from they just want to kill as many of 'em as possible.
 
What sense? Russia is projecting long term power in the ME. They're not going anywhere for a long time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top