Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
- Dec 12, 2013
- 25,744
- 3,045
Doesn't make any sense. But apparently, and I notice, long after the fact, all this evidence of ISIS involvement and a bombing of a Russian airliner is in the news. Where was all the 'chatter' and intercepts BEFORE the incident? Not hard to manufacture evidence after something happens. And it wouldn't be like, the first time in history a government with a desire to do something blamed somebody else (Hitler and the radio station for example.)
Russia's been bombing the crap out of ISIS' enemies. What possible reason would they have to force Putin to attack them in response to their murdering over 200 of his citizens?
Makes sense the rebels the US loves so much did it, being they're the ones Russia's bombing. And makes even more sense that if this is in fact the case, that the US, UK, and others would create a false flag story to blame ISIS instead of the rebels they're supporting now wouldn't it?
Russia's been bombing the crap out of ISIS' enemies. What possible reason would they have to force Putin to attack them in response to their murdering over 200 of his citizens?
Makes sense the rebels the US loves so much did it, being they're the ones Russia's bombing. And makes even more sense that if this is in fact the case, that the US, UK, and others would create a false flag story to blame ISIS instead of the rebels they're supporting now wouldn't it?