What ‘spooked the spooks’ about Trump?

[gipper]

Why did they pursue the obviously absurd Steele Dossier to such an extent? Was it merely Trump’s anti war rhetoric during the campaign or an effort to help HER and continue O’s legacy? Was there some other reason?

What does the MSM’s ridiculous promotion of this obvious fraudulent story, tell us about them?


What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate
Vital questions about perhaps the worst alleged presidential scandal in US history remain unanswered.
By Stephen F. Cohen

The Nation

September 5, 2019

(Snip)...
Why did Western intelligence agencies, prompted, it seems clear, by US ones, seek to undermine Trump’s presidential campaign? A reflexive answer might be because candidate Trump promised to “cooperate with Russia,” to pursue a pro-détente foreign policy, but this was hardly a startling, still less subversive, advocacy by a would-be Republican president. All of the major pro-détente episodes in the 20th century had been initiated by Republican presidents: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan.

So, again, what was it about Trump that so spooked the spooks so far off their rightful reservation and so intrusively into American presidential politics? Investigations being overseen by Attorney General William Barr may provide answers—or not. Barr has already leveled procedural charges against James Comey, head of the FBI under President Obama and briefly under President Trump, but the repeatedly hapless Comey seems incapable of having initiated such an audacious operation against a presidential candidate, still less a president-elect.

What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

Intelligence agencies did not undermine Trump's campaign. Maybe we should wonder why Trump's campaign was willing to work with the Russians to get dirt on Clinton. Why the numerous contacts with Russia. Why the campaign gave internal polling data and other campaign details to a Russian businessman who had ties to Russian Intelligence. Why Russian oligarchs were willing to finance Trump's ventures.

This is just another kook who becomes a source because he is saying what you want to hear. I would love for Trump to make this a issue and see what a kook Ttrump is.

Your post is entirely fact free.

 

[The Original Tree]

also been in the news they found nothing after 2 years of looking.

Maybe in wingnut bubble land... Not in what the rest of us call "reality"....

$100 Million spent. 23 Investigations over three years. Millions of documents made available to investigators, and not a single criminal recommendation for indictments against President Trump.

That's Reality

Neat! But It's not just about criminal activity.

No Criminal Activity was ever uncovered.

What's it about? Jokes Snowflake DemNazi Fasicists Don't Like?

Hillary Drunk and Stumbling in to a Black Van during the Election Cycle?

Or Putin's Dirty Little Secret with Obama and Clinton when he took $14 Million Dollars to Deliver The Dirty Russian Dossiere in the hopes of helping them defeat Trump in The Election?

 

[iceberg]

Why did they pursue the obviously absurd Steele Dossier to such an extent? Was it merely Trump’s anti war rhetoric during the campaign or an effort to help HER and continue O’s legacy? Was there some other reason?

What does the MSM’s ridiculous promotion of this obvious fraudulent story, tell us about them?


What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate
Vital questions about perhaps the worst alleged presidential scandal in US history remain unanswered.
By Stephen F. Cohen

The Nation

September 5, 2019

(Snip)...
Why did Western intelligence agencies, prompted, it seems clear, by US ones, seek to undermine Trump’s presidential campaign? A reflexive answer might be because candidate Trump promised to “cooperate with Russia,” to pursue a pro-détente foreign policy, but this was hardly a startling, still less subversive, advocacy by a would-be Republican president. All of the major pro-détente episodes in the 20th century had been initiated by Republican presidents: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan.

So, again, what was it about Trump that so spooked the spooks so far off their rightful reservation and so intrusively into American presidential politics? Investigations being overseen by Attorney General William Barr may provide answers—or not. Barr has already leveled procedural charges against James Comey, head of the FBI under President Obama and briefly under President Trump, but the repeatedly hapless Comey seems incapable of having initiated such an audacious operation against a presidential candidate, still less a president-elect.

What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

Intelligence agencies did not undermine Trump's campaign. Maybe we should wonder why Trump's campaign was willing to work with the Russians to get dirt on Clinton. Why the numerous contacts with Russia. Why the campaign gave internal polling data and other campaign details to a Russian businessman who had ties to Russian Intelligence. Why Russian oligarchs were willing to finance Trump's ventures.

This is just another kook who becomes a source because he is saying what you want to hear. I would love for Trump to make this a issue and see what a kook Ttrump is.

Your post is entirely fact free.

post.

life.

all the same concerning this one.

 

[iceberg]

Why did they pursue the obviously absurd Steele Dossier to such an extent? Was it merely Trump’s anti war rhetoric during the campaign or an effort to help HER and continue O’s legacy? Was there some other reason?

What does the MSM’s ridiculous promotion of this obvious fraudulent story, tell us about them?


What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate
Vital questions about perhaps the worst alleged presidential scandal in US history remain unanswered.
By Stephen F. Cohen

The Nation

September 5, 2019

(Snip)...
Why did Western intelligence agencies, prompted, it seems clear, by US ones, seek to undermine Trump’s presidential campaign? A reflexive answer might be because candidate Trump promised to “cooperate with Russia,” to pursue a pro-détente foreign policy, but this was hardly a startling, still less subversive, advocacy by a would-be Republican president. All of the major pro-détente episodes in the 20th century had been initiated by Republican presidents: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan.

So, again, what was it about Trump that so spooked the spooks so far off their rightful reservation and so intrusively into American presidential politics? Investigations being overseen by Attorney General William Barr may provide answers—or not. Barr has already leveled procedural charges against James Comey, head of the FBI under President Obama and briefly under President Trump, but the repeatedly hapless Comey seems incapable of having initiated such an audacious operation against a presidential candidate, still less a president-elect.

What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

People who do not watch fake news know enough about it now to know what happened. Illegal spying and other efforts were used to stop Trump from getting elected, and when he got elected those efforts morphed into discrediting him enough to get him impeached and overthrow the government. Thats then basic gist of it.

The gist of it is that you are a kook. You are fake news. There was no spying. They were checking out information they received on a investigation into Russian interference in our election. Impeaching a President is not overthrowing a government. It is a legal process.

information they happened to more or less give themselves so they can have a "reason" to look. if you want to make this a valid tactic, fine. just shut the fuck up when done to "your side" in return cause that's where we're headed.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm not sure what you guys are still babbling about. I already gave the correct answer to the question. Just because it triggers the trumpkins doesn't make it any less correct.

 

[gipper]

I'm not sure what you guys are still babbling about. I already gave the correct answer to the question. Just because it triggers the trumpkins doesn't make it any less correct.

Yeah Trump is a Russian agent.

 

[lennypartiv]

The only thing we know about Russiagate is Obama illegally spied on Trump.

 

[Lesh]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

 

[whitehall]

If we look at it rationally it seems that the foggy bottom unlimited secret budget CIA hasn't done anything right since WW2. We are coming up on the anniversary of the biggest intelligence failure in history in a couple of days and the CIA still pretends to have been a bystander on 9/11/2001. Former CIA chief John Brennan has been for all intents and purposes a freaking traitor who is relying on foreign propaganda as a CNN analyst to undermine the administration of the President of the United States. What does that tell you about the CIA? The DOJ seems reluctant to pursue treason charges against former FBI heads out of concern that it might impact the people's trust in the bureau. Once more it seems that even Trump appointees are as dumb as Obama appointees were but we will see.

 

[Muhammed]

Why did they pursue the obviously absurd Steele Dossier to such an extent? Was it merely Trump’s anti war rhetoric during the campaign or an effort to help HER and continue O’s legacy? Was there some other reason?

What does the MSM’s ridiculous promotion of this obvious fraudulent story, tell us about them?


What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate
Vital questions about perhaps the worst alleged presidential scandal in US history remain unanswered.
By Stephen F. Cohen

The Nation

September 5, 2019

(Snip)...
Why did Western intelligence agencies, prompted, it seems clear, by US ones, seek to undermine Trump’s presidential campaign? A reflexive answer might be because candidate Trump promised to “cooperate with Russia,” to pursue a pro-détente foreign policy, but this was hardly a startling, still less subversive, advocacy by a would-be Republican president. All of the major pro-détente episodes in the 20th century had been initiated by Republican presidents: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan.

So, again, what was it about Trump that so spooked the spooks so far off their rightful reservation and so intrusively into American presidential politics? Investigations being overseen by Attorney General William Barr may provide answers—or not. Barr has already leveled procedural charges against James Comey, head of the FBI under President Obama and briefly under President Trump, but the repeatedly hapless Comey seems incapable of having initiated such an audacious operation against a presidential candidate, still less a president-elect.

What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

Trump threatened to drain the swamp, so the swamp scum retaliated.

 

[gipper]

Why did they pursue the obviously absurd Steele Dossier to such an extent? Was it merely Trump’s anti war rhetoric during the campaign or an effort to help HER and continue O’s legacy? Was there some other reason?

What does the MSM’s ridiculous promotion of this obvious fraudulent story, tell us about them?


What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate
Vital questions about perhaps the worst alleged presidential scandal in US history remain unanswered.
By Stephen F. Cohen

The Nation

September 5, 2019

(Snip)...
Why did Western intelligence agencies, prompted, it seems clear, by US ones, seek to undermine Trump’s presidential campaign? A reflexive answer might be because candidate Trump promised to “cooperate with Russia,” to pursue a pro-détente foreign policy, but this was hardly a startling, still less subversive, advocacy by a would-be Republican president. All of the major pro-détente episodes in the 20th century had been initiated by Republican presidents: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan.

So, again, what was it about Trump that so spooked the spooks so far off their rightful reservation and so intrusively into American presidential politics? Investigations being overseen by Attorney General William Barr may provide answers—or not. Barr has already leveled procedural charges against James Comey, head of the FBI under President Obama and briefly under President Trump, but the repeatedly hapless Comey seems incapable of having initiated such an audacious operation against a presidential candidate, still less a president-elect.

What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

Trump threatened to drain the swamp, so the swamp scum retaliated.

Maybe it is as simple as that. Plus they knew SHE would do everything they wanted.

Unfortunately, Donnie hasn’t drained the swamp.

 

[gipper]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

 

[Seawytch]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

Yeah, when she was Secretary of State, not a candidate for president. She didn't have to lie to the American public about her meetings.

 

[gipper]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

Yeah, when she was Secretary of State, not a candidate for president. She didn't have to lie to the American public about her meetings.

She lied often. That was her mo.

 

[Lesh]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

And yet they interfered in our elective process to help HIM...not her...get elected

 

[Seawytch]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

Yeah, when she was Secretary of State, not a candidate for president. She didn't have to lie to the American public about her meetings.

She lied often. That was her mo.

No, that's Don the Con's MO. He lies more than anyone. He's up in the tens of thousands. From little stupid ones like whether it fucking rained at his inauguration to really big ones like whether he paid hush money to a porn star or that his campaign had dozens of undisclosed meetings with Russians tied to Putin.

 

[gipper]

Wait...so the OP thinks the big question is not why did Trump and company have dozens of contacts with Russians, but why did our intelligence agencies investigate all the Russian contacts? Wow....just....wow.

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

And yet they interfered in our elective process to help HIM...not her...get elected

They didn’t. Stop believing statist propaganda. A few dumb Facebook posts means nothing.

The crazy left and Deep State have demonized Russia, pushing us closer to Armageddon.

 

[gipper]

It is sad that Americans like you believe lies.

We live in an age where facts and truth no longer matter. Only one’s political narrative is truth.

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

Yeah, when she was Secretary of State, not a candidate for president. She didn't have to lie to the American public about her meetings.

She lied often. That was her mo.

No, that's Don the Con's MO. He lies more than anyone. He's up in the tens of thousands. From little stupid ones like whether it fucking rained at his inauguration to really big ones like whether he paid hush money to a porn star or that his campaign had dozens of undisclosed meetings with Russians tied to Putin.

That’s hilarious. You have chosen to believe lies.

There is much to criticize Donnie for, why make up shit pushed into your brain by deep state warmongers?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Trump being a Russian Puppet according to The Left

That was a fucking disgrace....I'm rather surprised that you'd support such a staged overreaction to a false flag.

That's one thing Trump has done that I did not like at all.

Globalist AP drummed that shit up and he fell for it and wasted millions of dollars.

Potentially kicking off some WW3 action, even.

The globalist AP lies and foments war, period. They are the mouthpiece of the global elite MIC.

 

[Seawytch]

The FACTS...document dozens of meetings with Putin's cronies...all of which were lied about to hide them

That’s ridiculous. I am betting Hillary had more high level contacts with Russia than did Donnie.

Yeah, when she was Secretary of State, not a candidate for president. She didn't have to lie to the American public about her meetings.

She lied often. That was her mo.

No, that's Don the Con's MO. He lies more than anyone. He's up in the tens of thousands. From little stupid ones like whether it fucking rained at his inauguration to really big ones like whether he paid hush money to a porn star or that his campaign had dozens of undisclosed meetings with Russians tied to Putin.

That’s hilarious. You have chosen to believe lies.

There is much to criticize Donnie for, why make up shit pushed into your brain by deep state warmongers?

Cite the lies.