Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Deregulating businesses means you have to trust them to do the right thing. It's like leaving your house and car unlocked, out of trust.
Actually you don't have to trust them, you just have to allow consumers to chose who to do business with. And that's why your government solution is failure out of the gate. They start by removing choice and then you really do have to trust them, and the only thing you can trust politicians to do is screw you. And screw you they do.
Then we don't need ingredient labels on foods, and inspections, because if enough people die from a bad product,
people won't patronize that business?
lol
Then we don't need ingredient labels on foods, and inspections, because if enough people die from a bad product,
people won't patronize that business?
lol
HOW EVER did we survive before idiotic Gubmint mandated LABELS?
Are you really that stupid? Government regulation didn't cause a need, it came from a need. That need was to keep people safe from corp's and those who ran them HAD TO BE MADE TO DO THE RIGHT THINGS.
Then we don't need ingredient labels on foods, and inspections, because if enough people die from a bad product,
people won't patronize that business?
lol
HOW EVER did we survive before idiotic Gubmint mandated LABELS?
I guarantee that if your grocery store had 2 sections, one for mandatory labeled food and one for anything goes unlabeled food,
you wouldn't shop in the latter section.
But they already do...It's called the produce section....I buy tons of stuff from there.Then we don't need ingredient labels on foods, and inspections, because if enough people die from a bad product,
people won't patronize that business?
lol
HOW EVER did we survive before idiotic Gubmint mandated LABELS?
I guarantee that if your grocery store had 2 sections, one for mandatory labeled food and one for anything goes unlabeled food,
you wouldn't shop in the latter section.
What will happen if we do what Repubs want and Deregulate Business
We would be headed for a disaster of biblical proportions. Old Testament real wrath-of-God type stuff! Fire and brimstone coming down from the sky! Rivers and seas boiling! Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...The dead rising from the grave!Human sacrifice! Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!
of course, we all know that corporations are very ethical and moral in their treatment of the environment, people and animals
corporations have never forced people to work 16-18 hours a day for peanuts
and live in shacks
and eat mud
and work in unhealthy conditions
and they never downsized american workers so they could hire cheap labor overseas
and they love to pay their fair share of taxes so they never hire lobbyists to get politicians to give them free rides
they've never dumped toxic waste and pollutants into our water supply or our air or into our childrens playgrounds
so we don't need to regulate big business because we know we can trust them to do the right thing
(not)
Would be a problem if the banking industry was in fact deregulated or under-regulated....Which it wasn't.Same thing that happened in 2008. 2008 wasn't the first time that deregulated or underegulated businesses crashed the economy.
Then we don't need ingredient labels on foods, and inspections, because if enough people die from a bad product,
people won't patronize that business?
lol
HOW EVER did we survive before idiotic Gubmint mandated LABELS?
Tell that to someone with a peanut allergy.
And we all know how terrible it was in the olden days, tripping over over all those dead people in the streets killed by peanut allergies!Then we don't need ingredient labels on foods, and inspections, because if enough people die from a bad product,
people won't patronize that business?
lol
HOW EVER did we survive before idiotic Gubmint mandated LABELS?
Tell that to someone with a peanut allergy.
HOW EVER did we survive before idiotic Gubmint mandated LABELS?
Tell that to someone with a peanut allergy.
People with allergies are not the standard the rest of the world should live with. It is not the governments job to ensure the life of the exception to the rule.
Tell that to someone with a peanut allergy.
People with allergies are not the standard the rest of the world should live with. It is not the governments job to ensure the life of the exception to the rule.
And here I keep being told that life liberty and the pursuit of happiness are God given unalienable rights,
and protecting those rights are true purpose of the Constitution.
I'm still waiting for this list of "unnecessary" regulations that some think we can do without.
I'm still waiting for this list of "unnecessary" regulations that some think we can do without.
Start with the CPSIA.
I'm still waiting for this list of "unnecessary" regulations that some think we can do without.
Start with the CPSIA.
Please explain how this is "unnecessary"? How is it "unnecessary" to know what is in the products we use and the food we eat?
I think a proposal by Sen Paul of KY is reasonable -- Any new regulation that would add an estimated $100M or so to costs or would have a significant effect on the price of goods or services would require congressional approval. That way you put it on congress to actually vote on significant regulations instead of punting to some regulatory agency and potentially leaving it to the courts.