Pedro de San Patricio
Gold Member
While my religious views are ultimately unknown even to myself, and I do realize that Joseph Smith made everything up in the same ad hoc way Muhammad did, but I still have to admit that I've always been particularly attracted to the LDS faith. It's just a fascinating religion to me. I'd go so far as to say it's one of the very few I'm actually friendly to, thanks to its focus on ensuring that people are cared for and encouraging healthy, stable families. The idea that we're all literal brothers and sisters on some level sits well with my own belief that all humans are basically cousins.
Anyway, thanks to all that, I spend a fair portion of my free time reading about church history and doctrine. One of the most interesting points in the church's history is when it was the de facto government of Utah Territory. I'm not saying I would actually support a theodemocratic system like what they had then, since separation of church and state is key for a healthy liberal democracy, but what would an LDS state look like today? Would the United Order fail again like it did the first time? Would there still be freedom of religion? Would the issue of the Deseret alphabet be brought back up, or is the popular rejection of that particular bit of LDS trivia final?
Anyway, thanks to all that, I spend a fair portion of my free time reading about church history and doctrine. One of the most interesting points in the church's history is when it was the de facto government of Utah Territory. I'm not saying I would actually support a theodemocratic system like what they had then, since separation of church and state is key for a healthy liberal democracy, but what would an LDS state look like today? Would the United Order fail again like it did the first time? Would there still be freedom of religion? Would the issue of the Deseret alphabet be brought back up, or is the popular rejection of that particular bit of LDS trivia final?