What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[P@triot]

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

If you’re pregnant - abso fucking lutely. Because you’re rights end where someone else’s begin. Fact.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Am I allowed to continue to have sex with a woman after she changes her mind?

Apparently, government should get to decide if the woman has such a choice. Her body is government property, according to some.

 

[Asclepias]

Your opinion is not a question. Its simply a misguided opinion I have already shown you was wrong.

It absolutely was a question in post 164, liar. You just don't want to answer it because you know you'll get caught in your BS.

Go back to sleep or get a better point. Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

For the umpteenth time, there are TWO bodies, Einstein. Repeating your lies doesn't make them any more true.

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

Pretty good view
If I though it was alive (which to me is survival outside the woman) then I would be against it. With the laws as to time frame I am less clear but a month or two just isn’t going to make it.
It’s a potential buyer future baby and living thing but not a current one.
Repeat abortions are not common but I dont have the stats. So maybe for now and future one within X months is allowed but any 2nd or 3rd request could be entirely different?

I wouldnt go there. I'm not a woman so its not even my right to claim the authority to make a decision.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If you’re pregnant - abso fucking lutely. Because you’re rights end where someone else’s begin. Fact.

You really don't see how that street runs both ways?

 

[Asclepias]

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

If you’re pregnant - abso fucking lutely. Because you’re rights end where someone else’s begin. Fact.

A fetus rights end when the female says get out of my body.

 

[P@triot]

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

Botney just did. Try and keep up son.

Show us where Botney said parents could kill their toddlers. Is this like when you claimed a fetus was an adult female?

Post #223 and reaffirmed in post #232.

 

[buttercup]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Show us where Botney said parents could kill their toddlers. Is this like when you claimed a fetus was an adult female?

To be fair, I jokingly said abortion should be legal until the 144th month (2 years old), but I am sure these desperate statists will try to use it to bolster their inconsistent arguments.

 

[P@triot]

If you’re pregnant - abso fucking lutely. Because you’re rights end where someone else’s begin. Fact.

You really don't see how that street runs both ways?

Oh I do, snowflake. But your “right” to “not be used” is far inferior to the right to life. Far inferior. Especially when that “use” is a mere 9 months and was the result of your own actions and own decisions.

 

[Asclepias]

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

Botney just did. Try and keep up son.

Show us where Botney said parents could kill their toddlers. Is this like when you claimed a fetus was an adult female?

Post #223 and reaffirmed in post #232.

Nope. Nothing in those posts say parents have the right to kill toddlers. If they did you would have quoted them.

 

[Asclepias]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

Show us the law that backs up your erroneous opinion? Thats like claiming a woman must continue having sex after she changes her mind.

 

[P@triot]

To be fair, I jokingly said abortion should be legal until the 144th month (2 years old), but I am sure these desperate statists will try to use it to bolster their inconsistent arguments.

To be fair...you did no such thing. You’re now back tracking out of shame. You should. Adolf Hitler also believed in mass termination of life.

 

[Coyote]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

You didn’t answer the question...

 

[buttercup]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

Show us the law that backs up your erroneous opinion?

Do you understand that laws are not always correct? Was the law on slavery correct? Next?

 

[Asclepias]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

Show us the law that backs up your erroneous opinion?

Do you understand that laws are not always correct? Was the law on slavery correct? Next?

So you have nothing to back your erroneous opinion? Thought so.

 

[buttercup]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

You didn’t answer the question...

The baby absolutely has the right to be in the womb.

 

[Asclepias]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

You didn’t answer the question...

The baby absolutely has the right to be in the womb.

Says who?

 

[Coyote]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

You didn’t answer the question...

The baby absolutely has the right to be in the womb.

So you believe that a person has the right to use another’s body against their will, then?

 

[buttercup]

So you have nothing to back your erroneous opinion? Thought so.

So you believe laws are always correct? By the way I asked you a couple times to not post to me anymore. You refuse to answer any questions, and I feel like I'm dealing with a mentally challenged 14 year old.

 

[Asclepias]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Do you understand that having sex leads to pregnancy? When you have sex, you're implicitly consenting to at the very least the possibility of getting pregnant. So it is asinine to turn around and claim that the baby is the guilty party here. The baby is 100% innocent.

You didn’t answer the question...

The baby absolutely has the right to be in the womb.

So you believe that a person has the right to use another’s body against their will, then?

This is going to be interesting.