What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

And what happens to these unwaned children? Republicans don't want to take care of the poor now? They keep wanting to cut food stamps, Medicaid, and welfare now.

We know the rich & upper middle class will still get abortions. These unwanted babies will be born the poorer people. Are you wuiklling to comnmiut to increase funding that will help take care of these kids?

If men could get pregnant, Walmart would offer abortions at $59.95.

We are noit talking bsbies, we are talking fetuses. Learn the difference.


1. It's not our responsibility to take care of children once they are born it is the parents .

2. Conservatives give way more to charity then liberals...fact and don't confuse charity with taxes , only a child poster does that

3. Once again you prove yourself anti biology a fetus is a baby, it will never be born a lollipop or a dandilion ..

4. Bullshit on that men could get pregnant thing.. news flash some men have faith in God , read the scripture's , have morals and common decency.

.
 
Picaro: what are you resisting? A serious conversation among adults?.

Do you know any? Doesn't appear you do know any adults. Why do you think women are too incapable of self-control?

You are full of shit by thinking that human sexuality may be reduced to "self control." "Self contol" among husbands and wives??? Boyfriends and girlfriends?

Please be aware that heterosexual humans engage in intercourse for reasons unrelated to procreation.

Please be aware that female people have eggs inside them and that male people have sperm inside of them that may penetrate the female egg and cause a pregnancy.


What are you an animal, yes self control...



I remember one time when a " girl as a friend" got drunk as hell together and we ended up getting busy..


She wanted to fuck so bad and I almost penetrated her, but had self control and didn't want to ruin our friend ship.



.
All humans are animals. Thats why we do the same things other animals do.


You maybe, you may have come from a monkey..

But I was created ... I have morals, honor and common decency and never stole a damn thing in my life.


.
 
Some people seem to be pretending that putting a woman's choice about her reproduction above the state's right to decide for her is "leftist".
Ridiculous.

Dude, abortion on demand is a plank in the Democrat political platform, and is NOT a plank in the Republican political platform.

Tells me it's an idea emanating from the left of the political spectrum, not the right.

Complaining that something is "on demand" shows ignorance at best and a willingness to submit to government control at worst. Everything is "on demand" unless one is unconscious in an emergency room.

Parsing words to try to change the argument shows ignorance at best and cowardice at worst.

If you're really hung up on the words, here you go:

Republican Party on Abortion
Democratic Party on Abortion

That make it clear enough for you why we keep saying abortion is leftist, as There is complaining? 'Cause I can start drawing pictures, if you need 'em.
 
Picaro: what are you resisting? A serious conversation among adults?.

Do you know any? Doesn't appear you do know any adults. Why do you think women are too incapable of self-control?

You are full of shit by thinking that human sexuality may be reduced to "self control." "Self contol" among husbands and wives??? Boyfriends and girlfriends?

Please be aware that heterosexual humans engage in intercourse for reasons unrelated to procreation.

Please be aware that female people have eggs inside them and that male people have sperm inside of them that may penetrate the female egg and cause a pregnancy.


What are you an animal, yes self control...



I remember one time when a " girl as a friend" got drunk as hell together and we ended up getting busy..


She wanted to fuck so bad and I almost penetrated her, but had self control and didn't want to ruin our friend ship.



.
All humans are animals. Thats why we do the same things other animals do.


You maybe, you may have come from a monkey..

But I was created ... I have morals, honor and common decency and never stole a damn thing in my life.


.
No you were born. Just like other animals.
 
What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands <snip>
It would deprive the GOP of a valuable fundraising tool

I think we can find a way to work around it. Why don't we try it and find out?
It would be nice, but if they were genuine they could have dealt with it legislatively long ago.
 
Some people seem to be pretending that putting a woman's choice about her reproduction above the state's right to decide for her is "leftist".
Ridiculous.

Some people avidly avoid admitting throwing her legs open and getting knocked up is the reproductive choice, and refuse to acknowledge that abortion is just murdering the kid after the choice, not 'reproductive choice'.
Since having sex is also a recreation you sound like an idiot.

Having sex solely for recreation is very much like having an eating disorder.

The primary purpose for eating is nutrition. It's O.K. to have some junk food now and then, but people who forget that the primary purpose of eating is nuittrition and who eat ONLY junk food have an eating disorder.

Similarly, people who only have sex for recreation and who forget the it's primary purpose is procreation suffer from a sexual disorder.

Besides, for young healthy women, having sex without respect for it's primary purpose, is a LIE.

Birth control and abortion are stop gap measures, eventually these the vast majority women either have babies or become barren.
No having sex is nothing like eating. If you dont have sex you can still live. If you dont eat you die. Sex serves multiple purposes. Having sex for recreation is not a disorder. All we have to do is look to nature to see this.

No sex and eating are not the same thing. No analogy hold true 100%.

But the desire to have sex for recreation is because nature plants a ruse in our brains. It make sex extremely pleasurable so that we will have sex. But the reason why nature does this is to cause us to procreate.
 
What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands <snip>
It would deprive the GOP of a valuable fundraising tool

I think we can find a way to work around it. Why don't we try it and find out?
It would be nice, but if they were genuine they could have dealt with it legislatively long ago.

Sorry, I'm not sure what you're talking about here.
 
What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts


It's always men who post shit like this.
You want to control women, then men will have to keep their zippers up, now won't they?
Idiot.
 
Picaro: what are you resisting? A serious conversation among adults?.

Do you know any? Doesn't appear you do know any adults. Why do you think women are too incapable of self-control?

You are full of shit by thinking that human sexuality may be reduced to "self control." "Self contol" among husbands and wives??? Boyfriends and girlfriends?

Please be aware that heterosexual humans engage in intercourse for reasons unrelated to procreation.

Please be aware that female people have eggs inside them and that male people have sperm inside of them that may penetrate the female egg and cause a pregnancy.


What are you an animal, yes self control...



I remember one time when a " girl as a friend" got drunk as hell together and we ended up getting busy..


She wanted to fuck so bad and I almost penetrated her, but had self control and didn't want to ruin our friend ship.



.
All humans are animals. Thats why we do the same things other animals do.


You maybe, you may have come from a monkey..

But I was created ... I have morals, honor and common decency and never stole a damn thing in my life.


.


"While I have no doubt that I was created by the hand and in the image of God, I equally have no doubt that my wife's family is descended from monkeys"

-Anonymous
 
Some people seem to be pretending that putting a woman's choice about her reproduction above the state's right to decide for her is "leftist".
Ridiculous.

Some people avidly avoid admitting throwing her legs open and getting knocked up is the reproductive choice, and refuse to acknowledge that abortion is just murdering the kid after the choice, not 'reproductive choice'.
Since having sex is also a recreation you sound like an idiot.

Having sex solely for recreation is very much like having an eating disorder.

The primary purpose for eating is nutrition. It's O.K. to have some junk food now and then, but people who forget that the primary purpose of eating is nuittrition and who eat ONLY junk food have an eating disorder.

Similarly, people who only have sex for recreation and who forget the it's primary purpose is procreation suffer from a sexual disorder.

Besides, for young healthy women, having sex without respect for it's primary purpose, is a LIE.

Birth control and abortion are stop gap measures, eventually these the vast majority women either have babies or become barren.
No having sex is nothing like eating. If you dont have sex you can still live. If you dont eat you die. Sex serves multiple purposes. Having sex for recreation is not a disorder. All we have to do is look to nature to see this.

No sex and eating are not the same thing. No analogy hold true 100%.

But the desire to have sex for recreation is because nature plants a ruse in our brains. It make sex extremely pleasurable so that we will have sex. But the reason why nature does this is to cause us to procreate.
I guess I should have been more specific. No having sex for recreation is not the same as having an eating disorder. Sex for recreation is a natural thing thats also done to relieve tension and exhibit dominance.

I disagree that its only for procreation for the few reasons I stated above.
 
What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts


It's always men who post shit like this.
You want to control women, then men will have to keep their zippers up, now won't they?
Idiot.

No, it's not "always men". I post the same thing all the time. And no one's trying to "control" women. Relax. Breathe. Your anger and frustration at nature for its arrangement of sexual reproduction is overwhelming you.
 
Do you know any? Doesn't appear you do know any adults. Why do you think women are too incapable of self-control?

You are full of shit by thinking that human sexuality may be reduced to "self control." "Self contol" among husbands and wives??? Boyfriends and girlfriends?

Please be aware that heterosexual humans engage in intercourse for reasons unrelated to procreation.

Please be aware that female people have eggs inside them and that male people have sperm inside of them that may penetrate the female egg and cause a pregnancy.


What are you an animal, yes self control...



I remember one time when a " girl as a friend" got drunk as hell together and we ended up getting busy..


She wanted to fuck so bad and I almost penetrated her, but had self control and didn't want to ruin our friend ship.



.
All humans are animals. Thats why we do the same things other animals do.


You maybe, you may have come from a monkey..

But I was created ... I have morals, honor and common decency and never stole a damn thing in my life.


.


"While I have no doubt that I was created by the hand and in the image of God, I equally have no doubt that my wife's family is descended from monkeys"

-Anonymous
Humans are not descended from monkeys. They share a common ancestor.
 
You are full of shit by thinking that human sexuality may be reduced to "self control." "Self contol" among husbands and wives??? Boyfriends and girlfriends?

Please be aware that heterosexual humans engage in intercourse for reasons unrelated to procreation.

Please be aware that female people have eggs inside them and that male people have sperm inside of them that may penetrate the female egg and cause a pregnancy.


What are you an animal, yes self control...



I remember one time when a " girl as a friend" got drunk as hell together and we ended up getting busy..


She wanted to fuck so bad and I almost penetrated her, but had self control and didn't want to ruin our friend ship.



.
All humans are animals. Thats why we do the same things other animals do.


You maybe, you may have come from a monkey..

But I was created ... I have morals, honor and common decency and never stole a damn thing in my life.


.


"While I have no doubt that I was created by the hand and in the image of God, I equally have no doubt that my wife's family is descended from monkeys"

-Anonymous
Humans are not descended from monkeys. They share a common ancestor.

It was a joke, dimwit.
 
Sex is not just "recreation." People do it as an expression of their emotional closeness: their, dare I say it, love for each other. This is how basic human sex works.
 
What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts


It's always men who post shit like this.
You want to control women, then men will have to keep their zippers up, now won't they?
Idiot.

Many of us believe that both men and women, as conscience human beings, should control themselves.
 
What are you an animal, yes self control...



I remember one time when a " girl as a friend" got drunk as hell together and we ended up getting busy..


She wanted to fuck so bad and I almost penetrated her, but had self control and didn't want to ruin our friend ship.



.
All humans are animals. Thats why we do the same things other animals do.


You maybe, you may have come from a monkey..

But I was created ... I have morals, honor and common decency and never stole a damn thing in my life.


.


"While I have no doubt that I was created by the hand and in the image of God, I equally have no doubt that my wife's family is descended from monkeys"

-Anonymous
Humans are not descended from monkeys. They share a common ancestor.

It was a joke, dimwit.
No dimwit. Bear was serious
 
What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts


It's always men who post shit like this.
You want to control women, then men will have to keep their zippers up, now won't they?
Idiot.

Many of us believe that both men and women, as conscience human beings, should control themselves.
Then control yourself. That doesnt give you the right to control others. Big difference.
 
Some people avidly avoid admitting throwing her legs open and getting knocked up is the reproductive choice, and refuse to acknowledge that abortion is just murdering the kid after the choice, not 'reproductive choice'.
Since having sex is also a recreation you sound like an idiot.

Having sex solely for recreation is very much like having an eating disorder.

The primary purpose for eating is nutrition. It's O.K. to have some junk food now and then, but people who forget that the primary purpose of eating is nuittrition and who eat ONLY junk food have an eating disorder.

Similarly, people who only have sex for recreation and who forget the it's primary purpose is procreation suffer from a sexual disorder.

Besides, for young healthy women, having sex without respect for it's primary purpose, is a LIE.

Birth control and abortion are stop gap measures, eventually these the vast majority women either have babies or become barren.
No having sex is nothing like eating. If you dont have sex you can still live. If you dont eat you die. Sex serves multiple purposes. Having sex for recreation is not a disorder. All we have to do is look to nature to see this.

No sex and eating are not the same thing. No analogy hold true 100%.

But the desire to have sex for recreation is because nature plants a ruse in our brains. It make sex extremely pleasurable so that we will have sex. But the reason why nature does this is to cause us to procreate.
I guess I should have been more specific. No having sex for recreation is not the same as having an eating disorder. Sex for recreation is a natural thing thats also done to relieve tension and exhibit dominance.

I disagree that its only for procreation for the few reasons I stated above.

It is not only for procreation. As I said in my original analogy, eating junk food every now and again is perfectly O.K., but being unaware that the primary purpose of eating is nutrition is a sickness.

In the same way, having sex for recreational or emotional reasons is O.K., but when you forget the primary purpose of sex - you are a pervert.
 
Since having sex is also a recreation you sound like an idiot.

Having sex solely for recreation is very much like having an eating disorder.

The primary purpose for eating is nutrition. It's O.K. to have some junk food now and then, but people who forget that the primary purpose of eating is nuittrition and who eat ONLY junk food have an eating disorder.

Similarly, people who only have sex for recreation and who forget the it's primary purpose is procreation suffer from a sexual disorder.

Besides, for young healthy women, having sex without respect for it's primary purpose, is a LIE.

Birth control and abortion are stop gap measures, eventually these the vast majority women either have babies or become barren.
No having sex is nothing like eating. If you dont have sex you can still live. If you dont eat you die. Sex serves multiple purposes. Having sex for recreation is not a disorder. All we have to do is look to nature to see this.

No sex and eating are not the same thing. No analogy hold true 100%.

But the desire to have sex for recreation is because nature plants a ruse in our brains. It make sex extremely pleasurable so that we will have sex. But the reason why nature does this is to cause us to procreate.
I guess I should have been more specific. No having sex for recreation is not the same as having an eating disorder. Sex for recreation is a natural thing thats also done to relieve tension and exhibit dominance.

I disagree that its only for procreation for the few reasons I stated above.

It is not only for procreation. As I said in my original analogy, eating junk food every now and again is perfectly O.K., but being unaware that the primary purpose of eating is nutrition is a sickness.

In the same way, having sex for recreational or emotional reasons is O.K., but when you forget the primary purpose of sex - you are a pervert.
Having recreational/emotional sex is not analogous to eating junk food. You will fuck up your body eating junk food. Nothing happens to you just from having sex. If anything you make yourself more emotionally stable plus its a workout.
 

Forum List

Back
Top