When Carson Takes A Commanding Lead, How Will Obama Attack Him? Rumble In The Jungle Part Two?

[NYcarbineer]

I don't think Obama is going to show much sympathy for Carson. As I recall, Carson attacked Obama awhile back,
at the prayer breakfast, of all places.

 

[auditor0007]

First of all, Obama isn't running. Secondly, Dems would probably like Carson as the Republican nominee even more so than Trump. Just because Carson says he can run the government on a 15% flat tax very softly doesn't make him smarter. It's still the dumbest thing he's said and he'll never be able to live it down because anyone with any sense at all knows a 15% flat tax would bankrupt this country.

I think a $20 trillion debt is more likely to bankrupt the country.

Considering Republicans are responsible for the bulk of it, I certainly don't want to give the reigns to another one who will make things worse.

Hey stupid, it was $10 trillion when Obama started his reign of error and it took over 200 years to get that high. Your commie buddy doubled it in 8 years. How are Republicans responsible for the bulk of it, idiot?

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

You think by resurrecting old talking points you're gonna somehow make a case that Obama hasn't driven the debt through the roof? "It's Bush's fault, it's Bush's fault"!

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

 

[auditor0007]

Considering Republicans are responsible for the bulk of it,

why are you publicly displaying your stupidity??

I know, it sucks when you guys have to use the real numbers, so calling anyone who does stupid just makes it all go away in your feeble minds.

 

[auditor0007]

First of all, Obama isn't running. Secondly, Dems would probably like Carson as the Republican nominee even more so than Trump. Just because Carson says he can run the government on a 15% flat tax very softly doesn't make him smarter. It's still the dumbest thing he's said and he'll never be able to live it down because anyone with any sense at all knows a 15% flat tax would bankrupt this country.

I think a $20 trillion debt is more likely to bankrupt the country.

Considering Republicans are responsible for the bulk of it, I certainly don't want to give the reigns to another one who will make things worse.

Hey stupid, it was $10 trillion when Obama started his reign of error and it took over 200 years to get that high. Your commie buddy doubled it in 8 years. How are Republicans responsible for the bulk of it, idiot?

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

Democrats controlled spending then.

Bush had veto power. Bush also ran some pretty big deficits when Republicans controlled Congress for the first six years of his presidency.

 

[S.J.]

I think a $20 trillion debt is more likely to bankrupt the country.

Considering Republicans are responsible for the bulk of it, I certainly don't want to give the reigns to another one who will make things worse.

Hey stupid, it was $10 trillion when Obama started his reign of error and it took over 200 years to get that high. Your commie buddy doubled it in 8 years. How are Republicans responsible for the bulk of it, idiot?

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

You think by resurrecting old talking points you're gonna somehow make a case that Obama hasn't driven the debt through the roof? "It's Bush's fault, it's Bush's fault"!

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

Um, yeah, it has everything to do with talking points. The facts aren't on your side. Fact: Obama doubled the debt that took over 200 years to accumulate. Case closed.

 

[auditor0007]

Considering Republicans are responsible for the bulk of it, I certainly don't want to give the reigns to another one who will make things worse.

Hey stupid, it was $10 trillion when Obama started his reign of error and it took over 200 years to get that high. Your commie buddy doubled it in 8 years. How are Republicans responsible for the bulk of it, idiot?

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

You think by resurrecting old talking points you're gonna somehow make a case that Obama hasn't driven the debt through the roof? "It's Bush's fault, it's Bush's fault"!

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

Um, yeah, it has everything to do with talking points. The facts aren't on your side. Fact: Obama doubled the debt that took over 200 years to accumulate. Case closed.

But he didn't. You just can't do math. Go back to school please.

 

[S.J.]

Hey stupid, it was $10 trillion when Obama started his reign of error and it took over 200 years to get that high. Your commie buddy doubled it in 8 years. How are Republicans responsible for the bulk of it, idiot?

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

You think by resurrecting old talking points you're gonna somehow make a case that Obama hasn't driven the debt through the roof? "It's Bush's fault, it's Bush's fault"!

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

Um, yeah, it has everything to do with talking points. The facts aren't on your side. Fact: Obama doubled the debt that took over 200 years to accumulate. Case closed.

But he didn't. You just can't do math. Go back to school please.

It was $10 trillion when Obama took office. It'll be $20 trillion when he leaves (if he leaves). I think YOUR'E the one who needs to go back to school.

 

[auditor0007]

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

You think by resurrecting old talking points you're gonna somehow make a case that Obama hasn't driven the debt through the roof? "It's Bush's fault, it's Bush's fault"!

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

Um, yeah, it has everything to do with talking points. The facts aren't on your side. Fact: Obama doubled the debt that took over 200 years to accumulate. Case closed.

But he didn't. You just can't do math. Go back to school please.

It was $10 trillion when Obama took office. It'll be $20 trillion when he leaves (if he leaves). I think YOUR'E the one who needs to go back to school.

Obama is not responsible for the 2009 budget other than an extra $200 billion he added to the budget. The budget is passed in October before the election even takes place. This goes for every president. GW Bush does not get credit for the 2001 budget as that was still Clinton's budget. When you take this into account, then you see that the deficit Obama inherited was over $11.5 trillion. Besides this, the fact is that Bush's tax rates created a devastating loss of revenue for the next few years after Bush crashed the economy. Had they cut spending to cut the deficit, they would have had to cut the budget by over $1 trillion each of the following two years. That would have thrown us into a depression. Last of all, based on projections, the next two years combined are only likely to have deficits around $400 billion or less, but we shall see. Revenues continue to increase as the economy gets stronger. That will leave the deficit at about $19 trillion or just over after 2017, which he will be responsible for. That is and increase of $7.5 trillion which is a 65% increase, much lower than GW Bush or Reagan for that matter.

Now, I can't help that you don't understand math, but this really is quite basic math. It's not calculus for God's sake.

 

[S.J.]

You think by resurrecting old talking points you're gonna somehow make a case that Obama hasn't driven the debt through the roof? "It's Bush's fault, it's Bush's fault"!

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

Um, yeah, it has everything to do with talking points. The facts aren't on your side. Fact: Obama doubled the debt that took over 200 years to accumulate. Case closed.

But he didn't. You just can't do math. Go back to school please.

It was $10 trillion when Obama took office. It'll be $20 trillion when he leaves (if he leaves). I think YOUR'E the one who needs to go back to school.

Obama is not responsible for the 2009 budget other than an extra $200 billion he added to the budget. The budget is passed in October before the election even takes place. This goes for every president. GW Bush does not get credit for the 2001 budget as that was still Clinton's budget. When you take this into account, then you see that the deficit Obama inherited was over $11.5 trillion. Besides this, the fact is that Bush's tax rates created a devastating loss of revenue for the next few years after Bush crashed the economy. Had they cut spending to cut the deficit, they would have had to cut the budget by over $1 trillion each of the following two years. That would have thrown us into a depression. Last of all, based on projections, the next two years combined are only likely to have deficits around $400 billion or less, but we shall see. Revenues continue to increase as the economy gets stronger. That will leave the deficit at about $19 trillion or just over after 2017, which he will be responsible for. That is and increase of $7.5 trillion which is a 65% increase, much lower than GW Bush or Reagan for that matter.

Now, I can't help that you don't understand math, but this really is quite basic math. It's not calculus for God's sake.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

It has nothing to do with "talking points". It's about facts; something you obviously do not understand.

Um, yeah, it has everything to do with talking points. The facts aren't on your side. Fact: Obama doubled the debt that took over 200 years to accumulate. Case closed.

But he didn't. You just can't do math. Go back to school please.

It was $10 trillion when Obama took office. It'll be $20 trillion when he leaves (if he leaves). I think YOUR'E the one who needs to go back to school.

Obama is not responsible for the 2009 budget other than an extra $200 billion he added to the budget. The budget is passed in October before the election even takes place. This goes for every president. GW Bush does not get credit for the 2001 budget as that was still Clinton's budget. When you take this into account, then you see that the deficit Obama inherited was over $11.5 trillion. Besides this, the fact is that Bush's tax rates created a devastating loss of revenue for the next few years after Bush crashed the economy. Had they cut spending to cut the deficit, they would have had to cut the budget by over $1 trillion each of the following two years. That would have thrown us into a depression. Last of all, based on projections, the next two years combined are only likely to have deficits around $400 billion or less, but we shall see. Revenues continue to increase as the economy gets stronger. That will leave the deficit at about $19 trillion or just over after 2017, which he will be responsible for. That is and increase of $7.5 trillion which is a 65% increase, much lower than GW Bush or Reagan for that matter.

Now, I can't help that you don't understand math, but this really is quite basic math. It's not calculus for God's sake.

everything bad that has happened since January 2009 is Obamas Fault!

 

[JoeB131]

You think Obama will try to take him out? Hmm, A Black Man VS Another Black Man?

Uh. NO.

I think the Media will take him out by simply pointing out all the Crazy Shit he has said telling groups of white people that their racism is okay.

Ben Carson is plain nuts: The 7 most stupefying statements by the GOP’s favorite neurosurgeon - Salon.com

Dr. Ben Carson, Crackpot | RealClearPolitics

 

[Rexx Taylor]

so what if Ben Carson leaves sponges in all of his patients.

 

[jknowgood]

I think a $20 trillion debt is more likely to bankrupt the country.

Considering Republicans are responsible for the bulk of it, I certainly don't want to give the reigns to another one who will make things worse.

Hey stupid, it was $10 trillion when Obama started his reign of error and it took over 200 years to get that high. Your commie buddy doubled it in 8 years. How are Republicans responsible for the bulk of it, idiot?

It was over $11 trillion with Bush's 2009 budget. Bush's 2009 budget set spending through the roof and that spending could not be reduced, so Bush gets the blame for most of it. Obama has stabilized spending, which actually has probably hurt the economy, but there wasn't much choice once Republicans took control of Congress. Bottom line is that Obama is bringing the deficit down each and every year since the economy began recovering. Reagan nearly doubled federal spending. GW Bush more than doubled federal spending. Obama will only increase spending by about 65% and that includes getting us through the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. Anyone who actually looks at the numbers factually will understand this.

Democrats controlled spending then.

Bush had veto power. Bush also ran some pretty big deficits when Republicans controlled Congress for the first six years of his presidency.

I've always said Bush spent to much. Can you say that about Obama?