Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #61
The choice is the woman's. For some it is right, for others not. It can't be a one size fits all situation. The reason for wanting to carry or not is very personal and deserves thought, but fortunately we have the right to choose.
If the choice involves having a baby you can't afford, do the rest of us get to say no when it comes to our money being taken to do it on their behalf?
Abortions are not paid by the state. Haven't been for decades.
Only rape victims have abortions paid for by the government.
Soon women will be able to have an abortion in the privacy of their home, at least for the first two month. It has been proven in other part of the world. No snoopy outsiders telling women what to do with their body
Why should rape victims have the ability to use taxpayer money for an abortion?
While that is an exception that many have for an abortion to be performed, why is the responsibility of a taxpayer to fund it?
When are women who choose not to have an abortion, in other words choose to have the child, going to quit demanding that taxpayers support the child she chose to have? If it's her choice either way, why should taxpayers support the results of a choice she says is no one else's business?