Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...
The GOP sucks precisely to the extent they are indistinguishable from the tax and spend liberal/socialist/Marxist tools we call the Democratics.
If you can't tell the difference between the GOP and the "Democratics" [sic], you need to look at the recent vote on health care to see that there is clearly a difference.
...
The GOP sucks precisely to the extent they are indistinguishable from the tax and spend liberal/socialist/Marxist tools we call the Democratics.
If you can't tell the difference between the GOP and the "Democratics" [sic], you need to look at the recent vote on health care to see that there is clearly a difference.
There is NO DIFFERENCE between the Democrats and Republicans - the ONLY reason they reject the bill is because it was proposed by the Democrats and the Prez is a Negro.
Once they assume power we will have Socialized Medicine.
.
If you can't tell the difference between the GOP and the "Democratics" [sic], you need to look at the recent vote on health care to see that there is clearly a difference.
There is NO DIFFERENCE between the Democrats and Republicans - the ONLY reason they reject the bill is because it was proposed by the Democrats and the Prez is a Negro.
Once they assume power we will have Socialized Medicine.
.
And the reason they didn't pass similar legislation when they were in power is because...
There is NO DIFFERENCE between the Democrats and Republicans - the ONLY reason they reject the bill is because it was proposed by the Democrats and the Prez is a Negro.
Once they assume power we will have Socialized Medicine.
.
And the reason they didn't pass similar legislation when they were in power is because...
1- They were busy bombing the fuck out of Iraq, Afpak and contemplating invading Iran
2- Let me remind you that Sen Lindsay Graham who is presently opposed to Obama Hellcare has stated that the had no problem NATIONALIZING banks. So the question is NOT if but when.
.
...
The GOP sucks precisely to the extent they are indistinguishable from the tax and spend liberal/socialist/Marxist tools we call the Democratics.
If you can't tell the difference between the GOP and the "Democratics" [sic], you need to look at the recent vote on health care to see that there is clearly a difference.
There is NO DIFFERENCE between the Democrats and Republicans - the ONLY reason they reject the bill is because it was proposed by the Democrats and the Prez is a Negro.
Once they assume power we will have Socialized Medicine.
.
Answer: When you are a Haloburton/Blackwater/KBR employee. You sign an agreement when you are hired that you will not sue if you are gang raped.
And the GOP want to allow government contractors to continue this practice. Nice.
The bimbos get what theydeserve. I have NO pity whatsoever for them. TRAMPS !
But she sure as hell is representative of the mindset of the American Left though, isn't she? Now let's imagine it was Rush Limbaugh accused of getting a 13 yr. old child drunk, giving her Quaaludes and then sodomizing her for a few hours. A show of hands whether we all believe people like Whoopi, Debra Winger and Woody Allen would be demanding HIS release from prison -or demanding his execution. ROFLMAO If they wouldn't be saying the same thing regardless of the individual involved while all other circumstances were the same -then they are a pack of sick hypocrites.
And I"m sure Polanski is especially grateful for signatures like Woody Allen - the guy who seduced the daughter of his lover and mother of his own daughter. The same guy who had his visitation rights to his daughter cut off by a judge due to his innapropriate sexualized behavior with that child.
I agree that Whoopi's comment was absolutely insane and most likely biased, because he is in the entertainment industry- I do NOT agree that her comment is biased because SHE is a liberal, and I do not agree that her comments that minimize the child's experience are at all representative of ANY majority. You are TURNING this comment into a partisan issue, which it is not. Whoopi made a bad call- on behalf of Whoopi, and nobody else.
Just because someone can voice their incorrect personal view of a crime on national television, does not make that view representative of a whole group's view, even if that person is a party member, unless that person is, say, the head of the party, and says "I speak on behalf of my party"..
Connection does not equate to correlation..
And I am a libertarian, who voted almost all the way liberal in the last presidential election, and I can tell you for a FACT that one person's distorted views of rape are not indicative of the majority of the populace's opinion as a whole. It is very illogical to say "Oh if one person says that, then the rest of them probably think that way also"- Remember that the ladies on The Voice are just a bunch of famous entertainers that sip coffee together on TV and talk about their opinions.. They are not judges, congresswomen, cabinet members, or governers.. Just a bunch of chicks who want to gab on TV. And yes- sometimes they say idiotic stuff.
What can ya do..
On what possible grounds could Whoopi have made these statements? Polanski pleaded GUILTY to this crime -not as if he ever claimed he didn't get a child drunk, give her Quaaludes and then sodomized her for hours. He admitted in court that this is what HE DID. He just fled the country before being sentenced for the crime he said he DID.
I happen to be a libertarian too. And nowhere in my political beliefs can I find any justification for downplaying this crime just because the predator fled the country before being sentenced and now a couple of decades have passed and let's all pretend that somehow that makes his crime against a CHILD just go away. Maybe you forget that Polanski admitted in court HE DID IT.
As I said, I GUARANTEE you that if Rush Limbaugh had pleaded guilty to getting a child drunk, giving her Quaaludes and then sodomizing her for hours while she was unconscious that Whoopi would NEVER have been demanding his release. She would have been demanding his execution. As if Limbaugh had just fled the country before being sentenced for the crime he already admitted in court that he did people like Whoopi would be demanding the US just ignore it all entirely. Politics don't play any role in deciding whether a person who admitted he committed this crime should be held accountable for it even years later. But it sure does for people like Whoopi -who only formed her opinion based on WHO admitted he committed this crime.
And by the way -a libertarian would NEVER have voted all liberal. Totally opposite political ideologies. No libertarian would have voted all liberal because a liberal favors a fascist state that forces people to do what those in power want and have decided is in every individual's best interests
- a libertarian believes in a government that never has the power to do any such thing and believe government is not a superior judge of what is in their best interests over their own judgment.
Opposite ends of the political spectrum. But libertarians never believe those who have admitted their guilt in the commission of a crime against another human being should not be held accountable for their crime just because they fled the country before being sentenced. Even libertarians believe in justice and not the ability of a wealthy person to flee the country in order to avoid it.
The bimbos get what theydeserve. I have NO pity whatsoever for them. TRAMPS !
Now how do You expect him to type?
