When it rains it pours!

MagicMike

Platinum Member
Aug 3, 2021
6,656
4,475
938
New Mexico
This guy has spent his entire adult life just one step ahead of disaster.
He has always had the money though to buy off justice.
This is probably the first time in his life he has faced problems that he couldn't just write a check and make go away.

"In the opinion for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote that the committee's investigation served a valid legislative purpose and that the 2019 request for Trump's records was not a retaliatory move in violation of his First Amendment rights.

"The need for the Trump Parties' information to inform potential legislation overrides the burden to the Executive Branch largely because that burden is so tenuous," Sentelle wrote"

 
This guy has spent his entire adult life just one step ahead of disaster.
He has always had the money though to buy off justice.
This is probably the first time in his life he has faced problems that he couldn't just write a check and make go away.

"In the opinion for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote that the committee's investigation served a valid legislative purpose and that the 2019 request for Trump's records was not a retaliatory move in violation of his First Amendment rights.

"The need for the Trump Parties' information to inform potential legislation overrides the burden to the Executive Branch largely because that burden is so tenuous," Sentelle wrote"

DROOL HARDER

1660091051942.png
 
This guy has spent his entire adult life just one step ahead of disaster.
He has always had the money though to buy off justice.
This is probably the first time in his life he has faced problems that he couldn't just write a check and make go away.

"In the opinion for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote that the committee's investigation served a valid legislative purpose and that the 2019 request for Trump's records was not a retaliatory move in violation of his First Amendment rights.

"The need for the Trump Parties' information to inform potential legislation overrides the burden to the Executive Branch largely because that burden is so tenuous," Sentelle wrote"

No need for a raid. A simple request with legal paperwork in hand may have been enough.
 
This guy has spent his entire adult life just one step ahead of disaster.
He has always had the money though to buy off justice.
This is probably the first time in his life he has faced problems that he couldn't just write a check and make go away.

"In the opinion for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote that the committee's investigation served a valid legislative purpose and that the 2019 request for Trump's records was not a retaliatory move in violation of his First Amendment rights.

"The need for the Trump Parties' information to inform potential legislation overrides the burden to the Executive Branch largely because that burden is so tenuous," Sentelle wrote"

I see this being decided in the SCOTUS.
 
This has been a FINE day! :cool:
How sad is your degenerate life if other people's misfortune pleases you? Sad.

There is no reason to investigate the taxes of private citizens prior to them taking office. We have an entire agency for that purpose. More judicial activism in the name of character assassination only further drags the country down to corrupt third world status.
 
How sad is your degenerate life if other people's misfortune pleases you? Sad.

There is no reason to investigate the taxes of private citizens prior to them taking office. We have an entire agency for that purpose. More judicial activism in the name of character assassination only further drags the country down to corrupt third world status.
He did promise he would release them if he ever got elected.
Does it bother you that he lied about that?
 
This guy has spent his entire adult life just one step ahead of disaster.
He has always had the money though to buy off justice.
This is probably the first time in his life he has faced problems that he couldn't just write a check and make go away.

"In the opinion for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote that the committee's investigation served a valid legislative purpose and that the 2019 request for Trump's records was not a retaliatory move in violation of his First Amendment rights.

"The need for the Trump Parties' information to inform potential legislation overrides the burden to the Executive Branch largely because that burden is so tenuous," Sentelle wrote"

Like Jeffrey Epstein, every member of a Board of Directors on Wall Street and almost everybody who has ever served on Capitol Hill.
Fell stupid yet?
You should.
 
He did promise he would release them if he ever got elected.
Does it bother you that he lied about that?
Why would it? I don't care about what his accountants do with Trump's money or how they find every available deduction. If anything I'd ask for pointers.
 
Did Obama ever release his actual birth certificate? No. A certification of live birth is not the same thing.

Did Trump ever say he would of course retain his own confidential records while he was being audited and under investigation? Yep. He did.
 
Did Obama ever release his actual birth certificate? No. A certification of live birth is not the same thing.

Did Trump ever say he would of course retain his own confidential records while he was being audited and under investigation? Yep. He did.

A certification of live birth has been around since the early 1960s.. used for the Vietnam draft deferral.
 
This guy has spent his entire adult life just one step ahead of disaster.
He has always had the money though to buy off justice.
This is probably the first time in his life he has faced problems that he couldn't just write a check and make go away.

"In the opinion for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote that the committee's investigation served a valid legislative purpose and that the 2019 request for Trump's records was not a retaliatory move in violation of his First Amendment rights.

"The need for the Trump Parties' information to inform potential legislation overrides the burden to the Executive Branch largely because that burden is so tenuous," Sentelle wrote"

Seriously, Trump's tax returns again? The tax returns audited every year by the IRS? The tax returns CPA's were paid to prepare? Those tax returns? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top