- Thread starter
- #481
I have yet to meet an agnostic. That does not mean they do not exist. That only means the moment they start discussing it they reveal themselves as not being an agnostic as you have done.You certainly do not understand agnosticism. Ingersoll said it best:And yet you still can't bring yourself to admit you are an unconditional atheist. You are no scientist either.Ashamed? Ha ha!No. I thought it was pretty accurate and funny. You are ashamed of being an atheist, as well you should be.Was that an emotional rant?Oh, I will try to keep up because I can tell that you are such a deep thinker.
The fact that you are drawn to argue with people who believe in God speaks volumes about your beliefs. In effect they give you away. You may even realize one day that you don't believe in God and that your semantic argument was in reality an admission of shame. Come out of the closet, monkey.
A monkey can do better than that.
It would be more interesting if you could put forth a rational argument for any claim of intelligence.
I am proud of being your atheist.
Those with logical minds realize that i am agnostic like most other scientists.
Again, try to keep up.
Silly Beliefs - Agnostics - Valid Stance or Scam?
"We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know."
If you cannot be honest about your ignorance, then it's your emotional problem, but you are ignorant nevertheless.