- Thread starter
- #501
Yes, expert testimony of scientists who testify on what science reveals is science.Expert testimony isn't science.It seems that there is no proof you will accept. You reject expert testimony, you reject written papers, you reject articles interviewing the experts who tell you exactly what I have stated and you reject video interviews of the experts who tell you exactly what I have stated. And you do all of this without having any proof of your own to counter what the experts tell you. Amazing. I'm sure with behaviors like that you won't have any problems in life.Ex: posting a link to an inflationary universe is not proof that the universe started with the BB.But I have. I have provided expert testimony. I have provided lnks to expert testimony. I have provided video's of expert testimony. You are the one who has provided nothing to counter it. Nada, zip, zilch, zero.You haven't posted any real proof of ANY of your claims, EVER!!Everything I have posted shows we know that the universe had a beginning and that the laws of nature were in place before it began. What proof have posted that it did not?
Sad part is is that you know it, and plow ahead anyways, lol.
Inflationary universe (Journal Article) | SciTech Connect
http://cds.cern.ch/record/210142/files/199008384.pdf
http://cds.cern.ch/record/213347/files/199012105.pdf?version=1&origin=publication_detail
And I'm not making any wild claims like you are, I'm on the exact same page as science, what's proven is proven, and what's not yet proven is a theory until proven otherwise. Pretty simple really.
You haven't provided any links to scientific papers in reputable publications or web sites.
Interviews aren't science.
You need to up your debating skills.
Given that I have explained the science and presented scientific testimony and you have presented nothing at all, I would say that you are the one who needs to improve her debating skills.