Which 9-11 theory you believe?

[eots]

why?
So you can just ignore it again like you have every time it has been shown to you?
Fuck off loser

no so you can prove you are not a lying sack of shit

you're calling me a liar?
prove it

you claim first responders reporting explosions clarify at some point , you claim you have provided evidence of this in the past you prove it... liar

 

[DiveCon]

no so you can prove you are not a lying sack of shit

you're calling me a liar?
prove it

you claim first responders reporting explosions clarify at some point , you claim you have provided evidence of this in the past you prove it... liar

i have, moron
which is why i wont waste my time doing it AGAIN"

 

[SFC Ollie]

i think the truthers are losing, not only their minds but their support.

please donate
today!
2010 to date:

we will not be able to continue this work without your help...
Please support 911truth.org.
Thank you.

9 years later -- why 9/11 truth still matters - 911truth.org

I think this is your gay attempt to distract from your lack of credible evidence to support your theory

I don't have a theory, I believe that the only real and official investigation got it mostly right. You and your friends are yet to bring forth physical evidence to disprove that.

 

[eots]

you're calling me a liar?
Prove it

you claim first responders reporting explosions clarify at some point , you claim you have provided evidence of this in the past you prove it... Liar

i have, moron
which is why i wont waste my time doing it again"

liar

 

[eots]

i think the truthers are losing, not only their minds but their support.

i think this is your gay attempt to distract from your lack of credible evidence to support your theory

i don't have a theory, i believe that the only real and official investigation got it mostly right. You and your friends are yet to bring forth physical evidence to disprove that.

you are not even sure of what the details of the official investigation are ...

 

[DiveCon]

you claim first responders reporting explosions clarify at some point , you claim you have provided evidence of this in the past you prove it... Liar

i have, moron
which is why i wont waste my time doing it again"

liar

moron

 

[Obamerican]

i think this is your gay attempt to distract from your lack of credible evidence to support your theory

i don't have a theory, i believe that the only real and official investigation got it mostly right. You and your friends are yet to bring forth physical evidence to disprove that.

you are not even sure of what the details of the official investigation are ...

Why do you idiot "truthers" think you're the only ones that come to the "right" conclusions". Egotistical individuals are what you are.

 

[eots]

i don't have a theory, i believe that the only real and official investigation got it mostly right. You and your friends are yet to bring forth physical evidence to disprove that.

you are not even sure of what the details of the official investigation are ...

Why do you idiot "truthers" think you're the only ones that come to the "right" conclusions". Egotistical individuals are what you are.

I am sure.. positive...you are another asshat that has no idea what the conclusion of nist or the the process by which they made these conclusions

 

[eots]

i think the truthers are losing, not only their minds but their support.

I think this is your gay attempt to distract from your lack of credible evidence to support your theory

I don't have a theory, I believe that the only real and official investigation got it mostly right. You and your friends are yet to bring forth physical evidence to disprove that.

you have belief.. a theory...

 

[Fizz]

I will ask you once again....

How do explosive demolitions make a building lean noticably hours before the implosion?

 

[eots]

I will ask you once again....

How do explosive demolitions make a building lean noticably hours before the implosion?

leaning noticeable for hours is not part of the NIST model are you claiming hours before the collapse fire had weakened the structure so much it noticeable leaned in one direction ?...may I remind you the NIST model requires that damage from debris play no significant role in the collapse ?...do you even know the official conclusions you claim to support ?

 

[DiveCon]

I will ask you once again....

How do explosive demolitions make a building lean noticably hours before the implosion?

leaning noticeable for hours is not part of the NIST model are you claiming hours before the collapse fire had weakened the structure so much it noticeable leaned in one direction ?...may I remind you the NIST model requires that damage from debris play no significant role in the collapse ?...do you even know the official conclusions you claim to support ?

do you even know the difference between "no significant role" and "no role"?

 

[eots]

I will ask you once again....

How do explosive demolitions make a building lean noticably hours before the implosion?

leaning noticeable for hours is not part of the NIST model are you claiming hours before the collapse fire had weakened the structure so much it noticeable leaned in one direction ?...may I remind you the NIST model requires that damage from debris play no significant role in the collapse ?...do you even know the official conclusions you claim to support ?

do you even know the difference between "no significant role" and "no role"?

yes do you ? nist states fire alone would have initiated a global collapse the only role given to falling debris is igniting the fire..do YOU understand that or is it too hard for you

 

[DiveCon]

leaning noticeable for hours is not part of the NIST model are you claiming hours before the collapse fire had weakened the structure so much it noticeable leaned in one direction ?...may I remind you the NIST model requires that damage from debris play no significant role in the collapse ?...do you even know the official conclusions you claim to support ?

do you even know the difference between "no significant role" and "no role"?

yes do you ? nist states fire alone would have initiated a global collapse the only role given to falling debris is igniting the fire..do YOU understand that or is it too hard for you

again, "would have" is not "did"

and its YOU thats totally fucking delusional and think it says something it DOESN'T
moron

 

[eots]

do you even know the difference between "no significant role" and "no role"?

yes do you ? nist states fire alone would have initiated a global collapse the only role given to falling debris is igniting the fire..do YOU understand that or is it too hard for you

again, "would have" is not "did"

so this is your dwiveconpiracy ?..that damage did play a significant role in the collapse ? even though it would cause the only evidence NIST has.{.the computer model} to fail and would render the entire report invalid...dwiveconspiracist are a silly and illogical bunch

 

[DiveCon]

yes do you ? nist states fire alone would have initiated a global collapse the only role given to falling debris is igniting the fire..do YOU understand that or is it too hard for you

again, "would have" is not "did"

so this is your dwiveconpiracy ?..that damage did play a significant role in the collapse ? even though it would cause the only evidence NIST has.{.the computer model} to fail and would render the entire report invalid...dwiveconspiracist are a silly and illogical bunch

you are too fucking stupid for words

 

[eots]

again, "would have" is not "did"

so this is your dwiveconpiracy ?..that damage did play a significant role in the collapse ? even though it would cause the only evidence NIST has.{.the computer model} to fail and would render the entire report invalid...dwiveconspiracist are a silly and illogical bunch

you are too fucking stupid for words

you are too stupid for words..thats why you are left speechless and cant grasp basic concepts

 

[DiveCon]

so this is your dwiveconpiracy ?..that damage did play a significant role in the collapse ? even though it would cause the only evidence NIST has.{.the computer model} to fail and would render the entire report invalid...dwiveconspiracist are a silly and illogical bunch

you are too fucking stupid for words

you are too stupid for words..thats why you are left speechless and cant grasp basic concepts

MASSIVE irony alert

 

[eots]

its clear you have lost the debate and can not support your claims

 

[DiveCon]

its clear you have lost the debate and can not support your claims

there is no "debate" dipshit
LOL
you clearly cant tell the difference between ridicule and debate