Which comes first: Irrefutable proof...or an investigation toward that irrefutable proof?

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,965
Probably under the "guidance" of FOX and Friends geniuses, right wingers on here, whenever there is mention of possible collusion between the Trumpsters and Russian oligarchs and Russian spies, revert to the trite: "Show me the proof?"

Now, the question arises (not that these same right wing nitwits could ever admit) if there already WAS proof, we wouldn't be subjected to the world embarrassment of an orange clown in the oval office........Proof is the result of careful, objective and unhindered investigations by both our intelligence agencies and [hopefully] congressional oversight committees.

We can witness this drip, drip, drip of allegations materializing, and tonight's news is that Carter Page and other Trump advisers were indeed the subject of Russian intelligence recruitment. Since some of these investigations go back to last summer, the issue is NOT whether Putin and his cohorts are currently recruiting, BUT whether the earlier recruitment led to collusion, such as the RNC platform's softening on Russian land grab in the Ukraine and Crimea.

Now, rarely there may be smoke but no fire.....but much more often, this amount of "smoke" CANNOT be witnessed without there having been a smoldering fire.
 
Russia saved our constitution from you


Be glad of that..


478752-US-Flag-Bald-Eagle-and-Constitution-montage-Stock-Photo-american.jpg
 
Probably under the "guidance" of FOX and Friends geniuses, right wingers on here, whenever there is mention of possible collusion between the Trumpsters and Russian oligarchs and Russian spies, revert to the trite: "Show me the proof?"

Now, the question arises (not that these same right wing nitwits could ever admit) if there already WAS proof, we wouldn't be subjected to the world embarrassment of an orange clown in the oval office........Proof is the result of careful, objective and unhindered investigations by both our intelligence agencies and [hopefully] congressional oversight committees.

We can witness this drip, drip, drip of allegations materializing, and tonight's news is that Carter Page and other Trump advisers were indeed the subject of Russian intelligence recruitment. Since some of these investigations go back to last summer, the issue is NOT whether Putin and his cohorts are currently recruiting, BUT whether the earlier recruitment led to collusion, such as the RNC platform's softening on Russian land grab in the Ukraine and Crimea.

Now, rarely there may be smoke but no fire.....but much more often, this amount of "smoke" CANNOT be witnessed without there having been a smoldering fire.
You seriously think if there was proof the MSM wouldn't run that 24-7 because they think so highly of the office of president? You have serious mental issues.
 
You seriously think if there was proof the MSM wouldn't run that 24-7 because they think so highly of the office of president? You have serious mental issues.

Patience, Mikebaby, patience....at this point we do NOT have indictable proof......have patience. LOL
 
You seriously think if there was proof the MSM wouldn't run that 24-7 because they think so highly of the office of president? You have serious mental issues.

Patience, Mikebaby, patience....at this point we do NOT have indictable proof......have patience. LOL

5 months later and still nothing


LMFAO
How long did we all have to hear about Benghazi?
We had evidence the first few days. You have nothing after months.
 

Forum List

Back
Top