Which of these Acts Justify Impeachment?

Which of these would justify impeaching a sitting president?

  • Selective enforcement of the law

    Votes: 13 65.0%
  • Accepting bribes

    Votes: 13 65.0%
  • Smuggling assault weapons to Mexican drug lords

    Votes: 13 65.0%
  • Wiretapping opposition leaders

    Votes: 11 55.0%
  • Targeting opposition leaders with IRS status and audits

    Votes: 12 60.0%
  • Treason against the American people

    Votes: 14 70.0%
  • Being a member of a racist organization

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Ordering the execution of American citizens without trial or other due process

    Votes: 12 60.0%
  • Any, but only if it is politically advantageous to the opposition

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Any number of them, but not just one

    Votes: 5 25.0%
  • None of them

    Votes: 4 20.0%

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .
Selective Enforcement of the Law after Swearing an Oath to uphold the Constitution and Laws of this Nation.

Tops on the list when just picking one.
 
Oops.........I could have had a V8.....................

Dang, I thought you could pick only one.
 
If Obama had actually done something wrong, then yeah, he should be impeached.

However.................all he really did was do what the GOP wanted him to do and gave large corporations (those that employ over 50 people) an extra year to get compliant with the ACA.

How loudly do you think that the GOP (who are in the pockets of the corporations) would squeal if Obama turned around tomorrow and said that they no longer had their extension and had to be compliant retroactively back to Jan 1?
 
If you are a left wing hypocrite, the simplest answers to this poll are the following:

If George W. Bush is the President, ANY and ALL of these actions are impeachable offenses.

If Barack Obama is the President, NONE of these actions are impeachable offenses.
 
If Obama had actually done something wrong, then yeah, he should be impeached.

However.................all he really did was do what the GOP wanted him to do and gave large corporations (those that employ over 50 people) an extra year to get compliant with the ACA.

How loudly do you think that the GOP (who are in the pockets of the corporations) would squeal if Obama turned around tomorrow and said that they no longer had their extension and had to be compliant retroactively back to Jan 1?

Blah Blah Blah.

The Senate is full of the Liberal Brigade, and will never hold him accountable unless you live under a rock. Which is why the idiot hasn't been impeached.
 
Which of these acts, if the President did them would justify him being impeached?

If Reagan wasn't impeached, nothing Obama has done will result in a conviction. If the Republican leadership in the H. of Rep. chose to pass articles of impeachment, it's likely the 2016 election will result in the final time the GOP has been considered a major party in the US.

Even those of average intelligence (maybe even those dumber such as Bowie, Stephanie or Warrior) understand that impeachment, solely for political advantage, is stupid (well, maybe not those as dumb as Bowie, Stephanie or Warrior) and will vote to put the partisan morons who vote for impeachment out to lunch with Bachmann, Palin and Eric the Weasel.
 
Last edited:
Some are crimes, but of those that are, they are not impeachable offensives absent evidence.

Others are too vague to make a determination.

And others are not 'crimes' at all.

But again, the issue is evidence of a crime, not that one 'believes' or 'thinks' or 'feels' that a president has committed a 'crime.'

Nixon's articles of impeachment, for example, involved the crime of obstruction of justice:

On June 17, 1972, and prior thereto, agents of the Committee for the Re-election of the President committed unlawful entry of the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee in Washington, District of Columbia, for the purpose of securing political intelligence. Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal entry; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities.

http://www.colorado.edu/AmStudies/lewis/1025/articlesNixon.pdf

Note that there is a specific date and place indicating when and where the crime took place, the specific charges, acts, and activities concerning the crime. Because of this compelling and abundant evidence, Nixon elected to resign from office rather than be convicted in the Senate.
 
If Obama had actually done something wrong, then yeah, he should be impeached.

However.................all he really did was do what the GOP wanted him to do and gave large corporations (those that employ over 50 people) an extra year to get compliant with the ACA.

How loudly do you think that the GOP (who are in the pockets of the corporations) would squeal if Obama turned around tomorrow and said that they no longer had their extension and had to be compliant retroactively back to Jan 1?

I included some things that Obama has not been accused of, but he has allowed guns to be sold/smuggled to Mexican drug lords, publically and officially engaged in selective law enforcement, hell he brags about it, and the IRS has been targeting political opponents under his regime.

These are known FACTS that no one even disputes.

So are they impeachable? Of course not, he's your dictator so you couldn't care less if he rolled over every grandmother in the nation with a pig shit truck, you would still excuse his actions as good for the public even if anyone could prove it.
 
If you are a left wing hypocrite, the simplest answers to this poll are the following:

If George W. Bush is the President, ANY and ALL of these actions are impeachable offenses.

If Barack Obama is the President, NONE of these actions are impeachable offenses.

Aint it the fucking truth?

These Nazis fucks could not give a shit less about our country or anything else, the whores. Just going to defend their man till he ruins the whole country, which they probably want to see anyway.
 
Which of these acts, if the President did them would justify him being impeached?

If Reagan wasn't impeached, nothing Obama has done will result in a conviction. If the Republican leadership in the H. of Rep. chose to pass articles of impeachment, it's likely the 2016 election will result in the final time the GOP has been considered a major party in the US.

Even those of average intelligence (maybe even those dumber such as Bowie, Stephanie or Warrior) understand that impeachment, solely for political advantage, is stupid (well, maybe not those as dumb as Bowie, Stephanie or Warrior) and will vote to put the partisan morons who vote for impeachment out to lunch with Bachmann, Palin and Eric the Weasel.

Typical libtard; avoid all the FACTS and engage in generalities, 'Man bitch good, your bitch bad.'

Please, go back to your fucking coloring book.
 
If you are a left wing hypocrite, the simplest answers to this poll are the following:

If George W. Bush is the President, ANY and ALL of these actions are impeachable offenses.

If Barack Obama is the President, NONE of these actions are impeachable offenses.

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Like an STD, the post is nothing to clap about.

lol, you have friends that clap about getting an STD? Is it those bug chasers people been talking about that want to get HIV and think it makes them some kind of tragic heroes?

well, then good luck

roflmao
 
Some are crimes, but of those that are, they are not impeachable offensives absent evidence.

Wow, no fuckingduh Captain Obvious.

Hotels.com_Captain_Obvious_LockedUp-1024x580.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top