Whistle Blower Outted -- It is a Brennen era operative....

The DNC nor Clinton campaign enlisted the help of the Ukraine.
This is an outright LIE!

The FBI and the State Department IG's just vindicated my position.

Schiff knew 2 weeks before the whistle blower lie was released. He participated in its manufacture. He directed the leaker as to what attorney to get. Schiff is a primary actor in the Coup attempt..

This thing is now blowing up like an atom bomb...
Bullshit.

Schiff Got Early Account of Accusations as Whistle-Blower’s Concerns Grew

“Big stuff. That’s a big story,” Mr. Trump said, waving a copy of the article in the air. “He knew long before and helped write it, too. It’s a scam,” the president added, accusing Mr. Schiff of helping the whistle-blower write his complaint. There is no evidence that Mr. Schiff did, and his spokesman said he saw no part of the complaint before it was filed.
 
Sure, listening to you clowns it's the end of the world every 20 minutes.
Then justify the phone call. Tell us how it was in the best interest of the nation. It benefits the 2020 re-election campaign, but how does it benefit our nation?
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
The Transcript does not support your ridiculous claim.
Sure it does. Zelensky asked for military aid and Trump asked for a favor -- investigate Biden, a candidate running in the 2020 election.

WTF, you seem to have an issue where you only read or hear every third word.
 
Asking someone to do something good for you is not extortion.
It is when you withhold the military aid they need to defend themselves against a Russian invasion.

It is when you use the power of the Presidency to get a foreign power to help your election possibilities

Using tax payer money to help YOU...is a problem
Obama NEVER gave them the lethal aid that Congress committed to them. Trump immediately did. Biden, citing their corruption, openly ordered them to sack their prosecutor or he would not a allow them to collect a Billion dollars. Trump, temporarily held back $400M, Ukraine wasn't aware of it, while he verified that they had dealt with their corruption issues.

How much fun will it be to argue simultaneously that Biden's clear quid pro quo was perfectly fine, because of Ukraine corruption, but Trump, with no quid pro quo, deserves to be impeached because he quietly held back half as much money while he confirmed that their corruption problem had been resolved?

It's not illegal to assist Ukraine's investigation of the Corrupt former Vice President and his cocained addled son. We are bound by Treaty and by obligation to the US tax payer to ensure that corrupt American Politicians are not just simply recycling our aid into their corrupt son's pockets.

You want open season on Trump, who has committed no crimes. And it to be forbidden to investigate nearly open corruption by the former Vice President and his coke addled son?

Have fun wit that!
 
A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

And by 'Coup', you mean an impeachment, explicitly laid out in the constitution as within the power of the House of Representatives?

I don't think 'coup' means what you think it means.
 
A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

And by 'Coup', you mean an impeachment, explicitly laid out in the constitution as within the power of the House of Representatives?

I don't think 'coup' means what you think it means.
Every House Impeachment, except this one, has been kicked off by a Full House Vote. This one is a farce. A coup attempt is apt. The Left has been threatening to impeach Trump since before he was even sworn in. You have nothing. You have not accepted the results of the 2016 election. You fool no one!
 
A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

And by 'Coup', you mean an impeachment, explicitly laid out in the constitution as within the power of the House of Representatives?

I don't think 'coup' means what you think it means.
Every House Impeachment, except this one, has been kicked off by a Full House Vote. This one is a farce. A coup attempt is apt. The Left has been threatening to impeach Trump since before he was even sworn in. You have nothing. You have not accepted the results of the 2016 election. You fool no one!

Here's the constitution. Just quote the relevant passage calling for a full house vote to open an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

......no, go ahead. I'll wait.

...

..

.

What? There is no such requirement....in law, the rules of the House, or most importantly, the Constitution?

So much for the hysteric 'coup' narrative. The House has every authority to impeach, every authority to open an impeachment inquiry.
 
One is a registered Democrat and the other is a career IRS official… They absolutely cannot be trusted at all the fucking pieces of shit.

Treasonous pieces of shit they should be shot.... lol
 
A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

And by 'Coup', you mean an impeachment, explicitly laid out in the constitution as within the power of the House of Representatives?

I don't think 'coup' means what you think it means.
Every House Impeachment, except this one, has been kicked off by a Full House Vote. This one is a farce. A coup attempt is apt. The Left has been threatening to impeach Trump since before he was even sworn in. You have nothing. You have not accepted the results of the 2016 election. You fool no one!

Here's the constitution. Just quote the relevant passage calling for a full house vote to open an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

......no, go ahead. I'll wait.

...

..

.

What? There is no such requirement....in law, the rules of the House, or most importantly, the Constitution?

So much for the hysteric 'coup' narrative. The House has every authority to impeach, every authority to open an impeachment inquiry.
A full House vote is to be taken seriously, when that occurs we are hearing a National Voice from a National Body. That is why EVERY other impeachment inquiry, besides this one, was preceded by a Full House vote. Nixon for example, the vote was 405-5! That's to be taken seriously.

Schiff has stood before the voters in a territory the size of a postage stamp in LA strewn with homeless tents. Pelosi, another piece of ground the size of a postage stamp, in San Francisco where tourists need maps of all the turds the homeless folks crap onto the sidewalks. They do not speak for the Nation until they hold a national vote.

That's why their "demand" that the State Department employees testify was an informal request for voluntary cooperation, not a subpoena. To have Subpoena Power, a full House vote is required. Which is why the Secretary of State told them to wipe their asses with it.

Don't be so easily led. Did you not wonder why they do not have subpoena power? Get skeptical! Demand Facts! Don't let these clowns so effortlessly lead you around by the nose.
 
A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

And by 'Coup', you mean an impeachment, explicitly laid out in the constitution as within the power of the House of Representatives?

I don't think 'coup' means what you think it means.
Every House Impeachment, except this one, has been kicked off by a Full House Vote. This one is a farce. A coup attempt is apt. The Left has been threatening to impeach Trump since before he was even sworn in. You have nothing. You have not accepted the results of the 2016 election. You fool no one!

Here's the constitution. Just quote the relevant passage calling for a full house vote to open an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

......no, go ahead. I'll wait.

...

..

.

What? There is no such requirement....in law, the rules of the House, or most importantly, the Constitution?

So much for the hysteric 'coup' narrative. The House has every authority to impeach, every authority to open an impeachment inquiry.
Where does it say Trump can't ask foreign governments to help the US investigate corrupt American politicians?
 
Sure, listening to you clowns it's the end of the world every 20 minutes.
Then justify the phone call. Tell us how it was in the best interest of the nation. It benefits the 2020 re-election campaign, but how does it benefit our nation?
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
It didn't happen, shit for brains.
Trump told us it did!
Wrong, shit for brains.
 
Asking someone to do something good for you is not extortion.
It is when you withhold the military aid they need to defend themselves against a Russian invasion.

It is when you use the power of the Presidency to get a foreign power to help your election possibilities

Using tax payer money to help YOU...is a problem
When are you going to quit lying, you leaky bag of shit?
 
Sure, listening to you clowns it's the end of the world every 20 minutes.
Then justify the phone call. Tell us how it was in the best interest of the nation. It benefits the 2020 re-election campaign, but how does it benefit our nation?
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
The Transcript does not support your ridiculous claim.
Sure it does. Zelensky asked for military aid and Trump asked for a favor -- investigate Biden, a candidate running in the 2020 election.
That wasn't the favor he asked for, cockroach.
 
I still think the "whitleblower" will end up to be adam schiffs nephew or some crooked relation like that.

That's why they wont release his name!
 
The WB went through all the required legal steps . That’s not leaking stupid
LOL
Well you ignorant welp...

They changed the rules specifically for this individual... so that they could not be investigated, so that the origins of the leak were hidden...

This is organized crime and illegal.

Why bother arguing with you... You can accept basic facts... You are trying everything to put your fingers in your ears and go la la la la....

No point showing you evidence or facts cause you just ignore them or claim stupidity...

So lets start with basic facts, the Whistleblower is a Whistleblower and all you are doing is trying to discredit anything he says without even knowing who he is... This makes you look stupid...
 
Then justify the phone call. Tell us how it was in the best interest of the nation. It benefits the 2020 re-election campaign, but how does it benefit our nation?
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
It didn't happen, shit for brains.
Trump told us it did!
Wrong, shit for brains.
Well then, I would like you to do us a favor though.

Curious the ad hominem comes with your post as gravy comes with mashed potatoes.
 
Then justify the phone call. Tell us how it was in the best interest of the nation. It benefits the 2020 re-election campaign, but how does it benefit our nation?
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
The Transcript does not support your ridiculous claim.
Sure it does. Zelensky asked for military aid and Trump asked for a favor -- investigate Biden, a candidate running in the 2020 election.
That wasn't the favor he asked for, cockroach.
Even as Trump said so today.
 
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
It didn't happen, shit for brains.
Trump told us it did!
Wrong, shit for brains.
Well then, I would like you to do us a favor though.

Curious the ad hominem comes with your post as gravy comes with mashed potatoes.

You aren't actually expecting me to treat you with respect, are you?
 
Investigating Democrat crooks is always a benefit to the nation.
Extorting a campaign benefit from a foreign leader is not investigation. It is extortion. And illegal.
The Transcript does not support your ridiculous claim.
Sure it does. Zelensky asked for military aid and Trump asked for a favor -- investigate Biden, a candidate running in the 2020 election.
That wasn't the favor he asked for, cockroach.
Even as Trump said so today.
Wrong, asshole.
 
67233226_899125077088356_6559795180013092864_n.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top