Whistleblower “fears for life”

[satrebil]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

You mean the so-called president who was in charge of the Justice Dept in charge of keeping J. Epstein safe in jail?

What an absurd reach, even for a leftist. Good God man seek help for your TDS.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

You mean the so-called president who was in charge of the Justice Dept in charge of keeping J. Epstein safe in jail?

That's what sabotage and sedition is all about. A mole is placed and then does his job. Our agencies are riddled with democrat corruption. Nothing is trustworthy. If it looks like schiff and pelosi are losing, Trump will be assassinated and made to look like a suicide..

 

[theHawk]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

You mean the so-called president who was in charge of the Justice Dept in charge of keeping J. Epstein safe in jail?

Riiiiiight....the President is personally in charge of all jails and prisons.

 

[idb]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

You mean the so-called president who was in charge of the Justice Dept in charge of keeping J. Epstein safe in jail?

Riiiiiight....the President is personally in charge of all jails and prisons.

Sure...why not...if they were going swimmingly he'd certainly claim all the credit.

 

[WillPower]

I hope he gets the Seth Rich treatment...Seeing as how Cankles "foundation" money all went to vodka, maybe she's hiring out.

 

[Crepitus]

Let's take a few steps backward.

A "whistleblower" law is intended to protect a good-faith complainant from termination or other disciplinary action for submitting a rightful complaint to top management.

A rightful, good-faith complaint must be truthful, factual, and correct.

The "whistleblower" complaint is, by its own terms, based on heresay. It is based on information provided ILLEGALLY to the whistleblower by those who were rightfully witness to the conversation. It must not be based on nefarious inferences about motivations, intentions, fears, or threats.

In this case, the actual principals in the conversation both say that there was no coercion, no threat of withholding of funds (The Ukrainians didn't learn of the possible withholding until a month later), and no quid pro quo.

This whistleblower is not a true whistleblower, and by all rights has waived any rights he might have had under the statute. His identity should immediately be made public, and he should be fired immediately.

You've tried this before. I debunked it in another thread already.

 

[Olde Europe]

Let's take a few steps backward.

A "whistleblower" law is intended to protect a good-faith complainant from termination or other disciplinary action for submitting a rightful complaint to top management.

A rightful, good-faith complaint must be truthful, factual, and correct.

The "whistleblower" complaint is, by its own terms, based on heresay. It is based on information provided ILLEGALLY to the whistleblower by those who were rightfully witness to the conversation. It must not be based on nefarious inferences about motivations, intentions, fears, or threats.

In this case, the actual principals in the conversation both say that there was no coercion, no threat of withholding of funds (The Ukrainians didn't learn of the possible withholding until a month later), and no quid pro quo.

This whistleblower is not a true whistleblower, and by all rights has waived any rights he might have had under the statute. His identity should immediately be made public, and he should be fired immediately.

Winner x 3
Eric Arthur Blair
Oddball
Obiwan

Agree x 1
depotoo

That "argument" is all the rage in Rightardia. There are just a few problems with it.

1. The IG has already examined the complaint, investigated the charges, and found them both credible and of urgent concern. With that the entire "hearsay" (!) argument falls away.

2. You don't know who the whistleblower is. Hence you cannot possibly know whether (s)he had the proper clearance to receive the information. Therefore the charge the information was received "ILLEGALLY" is just a slanderous smear with no basis in fact or evidence. Even if (s)he didn't have that security clearance, the illegality of the act would fall on those who provided the information, not on the recipient. With that, your charge also doesn't have a basis in law. So, either way, your attempt at slandering the whistleblower is a bust.

3. Of course Zelensky would say there was no pressure, even while his mentioning the Javelins he needed, and Trump demanding favors thereafter, is clear enough for anyone with a better than third-grade understanding of language. He, Zelensky, is staying as far away from the American intra-party fight as humanely possible, dependent on U.S. aid as he is for the survival of his nation. So, it doesn't matter when they learned the desperately needed Javelins aren't arriving: That's just a matter of when the pressure was fully felt, not one demonstrating there was none.

4. The whistleblower law that protects those exposing government wrongdoing is designed to prevent retaliation by vindictive, vengeful criminals and their henchmen, and your advocacy on behalf of your Dear Leader demonstrates conclusively how desperately needed that law truly is.

 

[Obiwan]

 

[Care4all]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

Trump s threatening him and trying to intimidate him and the house witnesses.

Trump is breaking the law on whistleblowers

And breaking the law on witness intimidation.

He needs to muzzled.

 

[Aletheia4u]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

Most likely, he is already dead. But they may have hooked him up to a machine to keep his blood circulating to preserve him for a certain occasion. The Whistleblower probably was going to snitch on them. But instead, they has killed him, and twisted the story around to make it seem as if he was blowing the whistle on Pres.Trump. Pres.Trump needs to send a doctor like Dr.Oz to check up on this Whistleblower.

 

[Billiejeens]

Let's take a few steps backward.

A "whistleblower" law is intended to protect a good-faith complainant from termination or other disciplinary action for submitting a rightful complaint to top management.

A rightful, good-faith complaint must be truthful, factual, and correct.

The "whistleblower" complaint is, by its own terms, based on heresay. It is based on information provided ILLEGALLY to the whistleblower by those who were rightfully witness to the conversation. It must not be based on nefarious inferences about motivations, intentions, fears, or threats.

In this case, the actual principals in the conversation both say that there was no coercion, no threat of withholding of funds (The Ukrainians didn't learn of the possible withholding until a month later), and no quid pro quo.

This whistleblower is not a true whistleblower, and by all rights has waived any rights he might have had under the statute. His identity should immediately be made public, and he should be fired immediately.

Good lord. The whistle blower was detailed, provided named sources and according to both the IG and MacGuire, acted in good faith AND was credible. He is absolutely a whistleblower under the law and frankly it is because of people like you that we need such a law.

The GOP Is Now Saying the Whistleblower Is Totally 'Not a Whistleblower'

He's not a whistleblower,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said Thursday. “I mean, we have to stipulate that a whistleblower has firsthand knowledge and he did not have firsthand knowledge. It was hearsay.”

The message builds on one of the talking points the White House accidentally sent to House Democratic offices on Wednesday: “The real scandal here is that leaks about a second-hand account of the President’s confidential phone call with a foreign leader triggered a media frenzy of false accusations against the President and forced the President to release the transcript.”

In their complaint, the whistleblower, reportedly a CIA agent temporarily detailed to the White House, makes a point to acknowledge that they didn’t witness the events firsthand. Instead, the complaint relays information that was gathered from a handful of officials who did have firsthand knowledge.

The GOP is seizing on that, Democrats say, in an effort to cast doubt on the entire process and put distance between the whistleblower and the president’s alleged misconduct.

It doesn’t change what's in the rough transcript of the call, or the fact that the Intelligence Community Inspector General found credible the whistleblower’s concerns that the president’s team was hiding call transcripts to protect the president. But the messaging campaign could drag out and obfuscate the investigation, morphing what some Democrats see as an open-and-shut case into something longer and muddier.

.....Trump and his allies have also begun to raise questions about whether lawful whistleblower protections should apply to this person, should he or she choose to eventually come forward. Nowhere was that more evident that in a recording of a closed-door meeting in which Trump mused about potentially executing spies.


That certainly sends a chilling message to whistleblowers attempting to expose government misconduct.

I will never understand people that are just simply partisan hacks - and don't care.
The last President did more to destroy the protections provided under the whistleblower act and True Whistleblowers than this President could in a dozen Presidencies.
You have/had no concern for that.
People such as yourself are simply world class hypocrites and should be treated as such.

 

[sparky]

Did i miss the Clinton hit man machine?

~S~

 

[Coyote]

Let's take a few steps backward.

A "whistleblower" law is intended to protect a good-faith complainant from termination or other disciplinary action for submitting a rightful complaint to top management.

A rightful, good-faith complaint must be truthful, factual, and correct.

The "whistleblower" complaint is, by its own terms, based on heresay. It is based on information provided ILLEGALLY to the whistleblower by those who were rightfully witness to the conversation. It must not be based on nefarious inferences about motivations, intentions, fears, or threats.

In this case, the actual principals in the conversation both say that there was no coercion, no threat of withholding of funds (The Ukrainians didn't learn of the possible withholding until a month later), and no quid pro quo.

This whistleblower is not a true whistleblower, and by all rights has waived any rights he might have had under the statute. His identity should immediately be made public, and he should be fired immediately.

Good lord. The whistle blower was detailed, provided named sources and according to both the IG and MacGuire, acted in good faith AND was credible. He is absolutely a whistleblower under the law and frankly it is because of people like you that we need such a law.

The GOP Is Now Saying the Whistleblower Is Totally 'Not a Whistleblower'

He's not a whistleblower,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said Thursday. “I mean, we have to stipulate that a whistleblower has firsthand knowledge and he did not have firsthand knowledge. It was hearsay.”

The message builds on one of the talking points the White House accidentally sent to House Democratic offices on Wednesday: “The real scandal here is that leaks about a second-hand account of the President’s confidential phone call with a foreign leader triggered a media frenzy of false accusations against the President and forced the President to release the transcript.”

In their complaint, the whistleblower, reportedly a CIA agent temporarily detailed to the White House, makes a point to acknowledge that they didn’t witness the events firsthand. Instead, the complaint relays information that was gathered from a handful of officials who did have firsthand knowledge.

The GOP is seizing on that, Democrats say, in an effort to cast doubt on the entire process and put distance between the whistleblower and the president’s alleged misconduct.

It doesn’t change what's in the rough transcript of the call, or the fact that the Intelligence Community Inspector General found credible the whistleblower’s concerns that the president’s team was hiding call transcripts to protect the president. But the messaging campaign could drag out and obfuscate the investigation, morphing what some Democrats see as an open-and-shut case into something longer and muddier.

.....Trump and his allies have also begun to raise questions about whether lawful whistleblower protections should apply to this person, should he or she choose to eventually come forward. Nowhere was that more evident that in a recording of a closed-door meeting in which Trump mused about potentially executing spies.


That certainly sends a chilling message to whistleblowers attempting to expose government misconduct.

I will never understand people that are just simply partisan hacks - and don't care.
The last President did more to destroy the protections provided under the whistleblower act and True Whistleblowers than this President could in a dozen Presidencies.
You have/had no concern for that.
People such as yourself are simply world class hypocrites and should be treated as such.

You ought to understand them, given you are one yourself.

People like you are eager to support breaking the law and covering it up it seems, when it's one of your own.

 

[Billiejeens]

Let's take a few steps backward.

A "whistleblower" law is intended to protect a good-faith complainant from termination or other disciplinary action for submitting a rightful complaint to top management.

A rightful, good-faith complaint must be truthful, factual, and correct.

The "whistleblower" complaint is, by its own terms, based on heresay. It is based on information provided ILLEGALLY to the whistleblower by those who were rightfully witness to the conversation. It must not be based on nefarious inferences about motivations, intentions, fears, or threats.

In this case, the actual principals in the conversation both say that there was no coercion, no threat of withholding of funds (The Ukrainians didn't learn of the possible withholding until a month later), and no quid pro quo.

This whistleblower is not a true whistleblower, and by all rights has waived any rights he might have had under the statute. His identity should immediately be made public, and he should be fired immediately.

Good lord. The whistle blower was detailed, provided named sources and according to both the IG and MacGuire, acted in good faith AND was credible. He is absolutely a whistleblower under the law and frankly it is because of people like you that we need such a law.

The GOP Is Now Saying the Whistleblower Is Totally 'Not a Whistleblower'

He's not a whistleblower,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said Thursday. “I mean, we have to stipulate that a whistleblower has firsthand knowledge and he did not have firsthand knowledge. It was hearsay.”

The message builds on one of the talking points the White House accidentally sent to House Democratic offices on Wednesday: “The real scandal here is that leaks about a second-hand account of the President’s confidential phone call with a foreign leader triggered a media frenzy of false accusations against the President and forced the President to release the transcript.”

In their complaint, the whistleblower, reportedly a CIA agent temporarily detailed to the White House, makes a point to acknowledge that they didn’t witness the events firsthand. Instead, the complaint relays information that was gathered from a handful of officials who did have firsthand knowledge.

The GOP is seizing on that, Democrats say, in an effort to cast doubt on the entire process and put distance between the whistleblower and the president’s alleged misconduct.

It doesn’t change what's in the rough transcript of the call, or the fact that the Intelligence Community Inspector General found credible the whistleblower’s concerns that the president’s team was hiding call transcripts to protect the president. But the messaging campaign could drag out and obfuscate the investigation, morphing what some Democrats see as an open-and-shut case into something longer and muddier.

.....Trump and his allies have also begun to raise questions about whether lawful whistleblower protections should apply to this person, should he or she choose to eventually come forward. Nowhere was that more evident that in a recording of a closed-door meeting in which Trump mused about potentially executing spies.


That certainly sends a chilling message to whistleblowers attempting to expose government misconduct.

I will never understand people that are just simply partisan hacks - and don't care.
The last President did more to destroy the protections provided under the whistleblower act and True Whistleblowers than this President could in a dozen Presidencies.
You have/had no concern for that.
People such as yourself are simply world class hypocrites and should be treated as such.

You ought to understand them, given you are one yourself.

People like you are eager to support breaking the law and covering it up it seems, when it's one of your own.

Nope

 

[mudwhistle]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

He has nothing to fear.
If he had evidence on Hillary he would have reasons to fear for his life.
They can off the fucker while in federal custody.

 

[WEATHER53]

Nothing for him to fear, he has revealed NO facts on the Clintons

 

[mudwhistle]

Let's take a few steps backward.

A "whistleblower" law is intended to protect a good-faith complainant from termination or other disciplinary action for submitting a rightful complaint to top management.

A rightful, good-faith complaint must be truthful, factual, and correct.

The "whistleblower" complaint is, by its own terms, based on heresay. It is based on information provided ILLEGALLY to the whistleblower by those who were rightfully witness to the conversation. It must not be based on nefarious inferences about motivations, intentions, fears, or threats.

In this case, the actual principals in the conversation both say that there was no coercion, no threat of withholding of funds (The Ukrainians didn't learn of the possible withholding until a month later), and no quid pro quo.

This whistleblower is not a true whistleblower, and by all rights has waived any rights he might have had under the statute. His identity should immediately be made public, and he should be fired immediately.

Good lord. The whistle blower was detailed, provided named sources and according to both the IG and MacGuire, acted in good faith AND was credible. He is absolutely a whistleblower under the law and frankly it is because of people like you that we need such a law.

The GOP Is Now Saying the Whistleblower Is Totally 'Not a Whistleblower'

He's not a whistleblower,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said Thursday. “I mean, we have to stipulate that a whistleblower has firsthand knowledge and he did not have firsthand knowledge. It was hearsay.”

The message builds on one of the talking points the White House accidentally sent to House Democratic offices on Wednesday: “The real scandal here is that leaks about a second-hand account of the President’s confidential phone call with a foreign leader triggered a media frenzy of false accusations against the President and forced the President to release the transcript.”

In their complaint, the whistleblower, reportedly a CIA agent temporarily detailed to the White House, makes a point to acknowledge that they didn’t witness the events firsthand. Instead, the complaint relays information that was gathered from a handful of officials who did have firsthand knowledge.

The GOP is seizing on that, Democrats say, in an effort to cast doubt on the entire process and put distance between the whistleblower and the president’s alleged misconduct.

It doesn’t change what's in the rough transcript of the call, or the fact that the Intelligence Community Inspector General found credible the whistleblower’s concerns that the president’s team was hiding call transcripts to protect the president. But the messaging campaign could drag out and obfuscate the investigation, morphing what some Democrats see as an open-and-shut case into something longer and muddier.

.....Trump and his allies have also begun to raise questions about whether lawful whistleblower protections should apply to this person, should he or she choose to eventually come forward. Nowhere was that more evident that in a recording of a closed-door meeting in which Trump mused about potentially executing spies.


That certainly sends a chilling message to whistleblowers attempting to expose government misconduct.

I will never understand people that are just simply partisan hacks - and don't care.
The last President did more to destroy the protections provided under the whistleblower act and True Whistleblowers than this President could in a dozen Presidencies.
You have/had no concern for that.
People such as yourself are simply world class hypocrites and should be treated as such.

You ought to understand them, given you are one yourself.

People like you are eager to support breaking the law and covering it up it seems, when it's one of your own.

That's purely your extremely biased opinion.
But ironically it is very God Damned true with you, lady.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

Trump s threatening him and trying to intimidate him and the house witnesses.

Trump is breaking the law on whistleblowers

And breaking the law on witness intimidation.

He needs to muzzled.

Rumors are it's a tranny looking he/she...aka demoquck RINO.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

How long until the Clinton-Hussein cabal offs this “whistleblower” plant, then blame it on President Trump?

whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection, because he or she fears for their safety.

Nancy Pelosi on impeachment inquiry: "We could not ignore what the president did." - 60 minutes interview - CBS News

Yep. The Clinton's are who he fears. You dont mess up a Clinton scheme!

 

[sparky]

partisan pukes....

~S~