Whistleblower’s Lawyers Release Statement Threatening Journalists If They Publish His Name

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I just posted the evidence,

Oops no, sorry, you did not.

Yes, I did. Here it is again:

False. No rule change. Not pertinent. Sorry, trumpkin.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

By the way, to save you fools from any more embarrassment:

The IC IG publicly said the whistleblower had first hand information.

Oh well, back the the wingnut bubble search for the next bunk talking point to embarrass yourselves with...

 

[bripat9643]

I just posted the evidence,

Oops no, sorry, you did not.

Yes, I did. Here it is again:

False. No rule change. Not pertinent. Sorry, trumpkin.

Sure there was. They didn't change the law, but they sure as hell changed the rule.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I just posted the evidence,

Oops no, sorry, you did not.

Yes, I did. Here it is again:

False. No rule change. Not pertinent. Sorry, trumpkin.

Sure there was. They didn't change the law, but they sure as hell changed the rule.

False. You are really falling on your face.

 

[bripat9643]

I just posted the evidence,

Oops no, sorry, you did not.

Yes, I did. Here it is again:

False. No rule change. Not pertinent. Sorry, trumpkin.

Sure there was. They didn't change the law, but they sure as hell changed the rule.

False. You are really falling on your face.

What's "false," the sample of the document I posted?

Face it: you're wrong, and you know it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What's "false,"

For the eleventieth time:

No rule change. Nothing pertinent.

Got it?

 

[Coyote]

I just posted the evidence,

Oops no, sorry, you did not.

Yes, I did. Here it is again:

Legal Experts Debunk Whistleblower Conspiracy Theory Trump Has Embraced

The entirety of the claim, which has now picked up steam amongst many on the political right, stems from a misreading of language that appeared in the May 2018 whistleblower submission form which was then removed from the August 2019 version of the form, and specifically pertains to the IC Inspector General’s post-investigation decision regarding the complaint, not the initial submission...

 

[Coyote]

By the way, to save you fools from any more embarrassment:

The IC IG publicly said the whistleblower had first hand information.

Oh well, back the the wingnut bubble search for the next bunk talking point to embarrass yourselves with...

That seems to have sailed over their heads....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That seems to have sailed over their heads....

Because the right wing media ignored it. They probably didn't even know it.

 

[bripat9643]

What's "false,"

For the eleventieth time:

No rule change. Nothing pertinent.

Got it?

The rule was changed, shit for brains.

 

[bripat9643]

I just posted the evidence,

Oops no, sorry, you did not.

Yes, I did. Here it is again:

Legal Experts Debunk Whistleblower Conspiracy Theory Trump Has Embraced

The entirety of the claim, which has now picked up steam amongst many on the political right, stems from a misreading of language that appeared in the May 2018 whistleblower submission form which was then removed from the August 2019 version of the form, and specifically pertains to the IC Inspector General’s post-investigation decision regarding the complaint, not the initial submission...

Wrong. The form was changed. I posted the irrefutable evidence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What's "false,"

For the eleventieth time:

No rule change. Nothing pertinent.

Got it?

The rule was changed, shit for brains.

No rule was changed. You are regurgitating a debunked talking point.

Did you read this in Giuliani's signed affidavits that he waved around on television?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wrong. The form was changed.

But not the rules.

Hey everyone, look how quickly bripat changes lanes!

This bait-and-switch brought to you by every rightwing AM radio host.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Wait, what happened to freedom of the press? If they have the name, they should release the name. Inquiring minds want to know. And I don't care about his family and friends. I do think he should be required to testify as a significant witness for this whole impeachment circus.

You mean like how National Enquirer should have published the interview with the Playboy model who had sex with married Donald Trump- but buried it at Trump's request?

You mean that free press?

Do you know what "free" means?

.

It doesn't mean you're free to break the law.

It's very illegal for anyone to disclose the name of a whistleblower. Which is why no reputable news outlet will do such a thing. Nor would a reputable news outlet disclose the name of someone without proof.

There's no proof that this is the right person. He's getting death threats and may not even be involved.

Do you really believe that a totally innocent person should endure that?

Do you know what innocent until proven guilty means?

How is it illegal to release the name of a whistleblower? Quote the law.

It is illegal to target them for reprisals.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How is it illegal to release the name of a whistleblower? Quote the law.

How is it illegal to release the name of a whistleblower?

It's not illegal for the pres to do it. But it is illegal for whatever government employee secretly passes that name to them. Only the IG is allowed to release that info, and only under extenuating circumstances.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So how many death threats do you imagine this guy has gotten? I know practically all of them are just you keyboard commandos talking tough but there are some of you who would murder this guy with a smile.

Well, let's see now - he engaged in espionage against the President of the United States for the express purpose of overthrowing the United States Government.

I'd say the 'death threat' he faces is following Tim McVeigh to the traitors reward - deservedly so.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

he engaged in espionage against the President of the United States for the express purpose of overthrowing the United States Government.

*cuckoo*

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Best way to try and protect a traitorous, bullshit spy is to give him the magical cover of “whistleblower” Realty, just another safe space.

The best way to discredit a whistleblower is to claim HE is the traiter instead of the person he is reporting on, isn’t?

What's a "traiter"?

Is that a potato that betrays its country?

 

[Uncensored2008]

he engaged in espionage against the President of the United States for the express purpose of overthrowing the United States Government.

*cuckoo*

Facts are "cuckoo?"

You Communists are bizarre.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

he engaged in espionage against the President of the United States for the express purpose of overthrowing the United States Government.

*cuckoo*

Facts are "cuckoo?"

You Communists are bizarre.

Okay, nutball.