Who are you going to believe? Dirty Fuel Profiteers' Toadies or Your Lying Eyes?

The lying criminal that preceded Biden in the White House gave the very wealthy that much in tax breaks. Didn't do a thing for the economy or the average worker. Concerning a wealth tax. If I add an addition on my house, my property taxes go up. Why should that be any different for someone adding immense wealth in their holding? Yes, $10 billion for Elon Musk sounds like a lot, but his holding increased in value by $36 billion in just one day.
Ah lets score your post...lie, lie, lie, some kind of deflection, moocher, and wealth envy.
 
Will leadership emerge in such an undeniable existential crisis?
The State of the Climate report for 2021 highlights a world that is "changing before our eyes."
The 20-year temperature average from 2002 is on course to exceed 1C above pre-industrial levels for the first time.
And global sea levels rose to a new high in 2021, according to the study.
These latest figures for 2021 are being released early by the WMO to coincide with the start of the UN climate conference in Glasgow known as COP26.
Ideologues have their blindfolds to accessorize their tin foil toppers, but those charged with coping with the empirical reality do not have the luxury of self-delusion.

View attachment 558610

View attachment 558611

"The concept of global warming

was created by and for the Chinese

in order to make U.S. manufacturing


non-competitive!"


View attachment 558617

“I hope world leaders will hear them and come to Glasgow


ready to answer them with decisive action.



We need to recognise the scale of the consequences if we fail.

The difference between restricting the growth in temperatures to 1.5C

and allowing them to increase by 4C is potentially absolutely catastrophic

for our children, our grandchildren and succeeding generations.

We cannot discount their welfare.



“Together, we can mark the beginning of the end of climate change —

and end the uncertainty once and for all.”







Climate change is a risk to national security, the Pentagon says



View attachment 558629

"Plan for the future!

Soaring temperatures, droughts, fires, floods, food shortages, etc.

will drive more desperate families to our border,

but once it gets just as crappy here,


there'll be no more reason for all them

rapists 'n drug dealers to come!"






We've all heard this doom and gloom literally for decades now. For example..............

Fuck off, Skinflap with your corny nonsense. You're a tiresome crank and not even good for a laugh.
 
MarathonMike

""Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." Ronald Reagan"

"Now, please look over there at the shiny racist bauble, while I greatly increase the size of government" - Ronald Reagan
 
We've all heard this doom and gloom literally for decades now. For example..............

Fuck off, Skinflap with your corny nonsense. You're a tiresome crank and not even good for a laugh.
So you are another dumb fuck that does not bother to read peer reviewed journals, and what the predictions of real scientist like Dr. James Hansen have been. What they have been is spot on. The graph he made in the 1980's predicted exactly what has happened as far as temperature is concerned. Yes, he did miss a vital point. The results of the increase in temperature have been far more severe, happening sooner than he predicted. The Northwest Passage did not wait to the end of this century to open for the first time, it opened in 2007. And in 2016 it was open enough for a 1000 passenger luxury liner to transit the passage.
 
Yes, no President GOP or DEM has done anything to limit the uncontrolled growth of government.
"Uncontrolled" is your weasel word. Eliminating this weasel word leaves us with government growth. Which is to be expected, in a country that also grows, in both population and GDP. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with that. Reagan was made to see this, despite his delivery of rhetoric to the contrary being fed to him by people much smarter than him.
 
"Uncontrolled" is your weasel word. Eliminating this weasel word leaves us with government growth. Which is to be expected, in a country that also grows, in both population and GDP. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with that. Reagan was made to see this, despite his delivery of rhetoric to the contrary being fed to him by people much smarter than him.
Getting back on topic, do you agree or disagree that there are "Dirty Green Energy Profiteers" pushing the agenda?
 
Getting back on topic, do you agree or disagree that there are "Dirty Green Energy Profiteers" pushing the agenda?
No ,but so what? What agenda does not have profiteers pushing at both sides, in an American society where for profit corporations control the government? This is just a little red herring you want to rant about, because of your political fetishes.

And especially ironic is that you basically laid the groundwork for4 labeling you as a shill for Big Oil and writing off you and any idea you support, without giving any further thought. How far can intelligent discussion get, if we operate on such a base, idiotic level?
 
Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann........
Eminently qualified, indeed. The professor of meteorology and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at Penn State University noted, “The impacts of climate change are no longer merely theoretical. We are watching them play out in real time in the form of unprecedented weather disasters.”

It's hard to believe that any rational, objective folks are still in denial, even as the empirical data accrues, the evidence becomes increasingly obvious, and the expert consensus becomes even stronger, but the refusal to accept the reality is emotionally based, not a matter of intellectual capacity for the diehards.

The correspondence with the wacky notion that a "Landslide!" was mysteriously stolen by a vast conspiracy of unknown dastards in a presidential election with predictable results is, quite likely, an accompanying symptom of the same abandonment of reason, a weird worship of one dude with no scientific credentials whatever who tells them climate change is a Chinese hoax, and they actually swallow it.

Most Americans say climate change is a crisis
but

Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 5.09.16 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 5.10.49 PM.png
the
 
Last edited:
Eminently qualified, indeed. The professor of meteorology and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at Penn State University noted, “The impacts of climate change are no longer merely theoretical. We are watching them play out in real time in the form of unprecedented weather disasters.”

It's hard to believe that any rational, objective folks are still in denial, even as the empirical data accrues, the evidence becomes increasingly obvious, and the expert consensus becomes even stronger, but the refusal to accept the reality is emotionally based, not a matter of intellectual capacity for the diehards.

The correspondence with the wacky notion that a "Landslide!" was mysteriously stolen by a vast conspiracy of unknown dastards in a presidential election with predictable results is, quite likely, an accompanying symptom of the same abandonment of reason, a weird worship of one dude with no scientific credentials whatever who tells them climate change is a Chinese hoax, and they actually swallow it.

the

He's awesome!!!

Why did he win the Nobel Prize?
 
He's awesome!!!

Why did he win the Nobel Prize?
He didn't, no more than the Cry Baby Loser won a "Landslide!" in 2020.

No single climatologist establishes the virtual certitude of anthropogenic climate change. Rather it is the overwhelming expert consensus predicated upon the vast amount of accrued empirical data.
 
He didn't, no more than the Cry Baby Loser won a "Landslide!" in 2020.

No single climatologist establishes the virtual certitude of anthropogenic climate change. Rather it is the overwhelming expert consensus predicated upon the vast amount of accrued empirical data.

He didn't,

He didn't win the Nobel Prize?

Why did he lie and claim he did?

Is it because he's a liar?
 
No ,but so what? What agenda does not have profiteers pushing at both sides, in an American society where for profit corporations control the government? This is just a little red herring you want to rant about, because of your political fetishes.
Excellent I am glad you agree that the pushers of the Green agenda are just as dirty and profit hungry as the fossil fuel profiteers. The Left tries to wrap themselves in goodness and nobility when they push their Green nonsense I'm glad you see them for what they are.
 
So you are another dumb fuck that does not bother to read peer reviewed journals, and what the predictions of real scientist like Dr. James Hansen have been. What they have been is spot on. The graph he made in the 1980's predicted exactly what has happened as far as temperature is concerned. Yes, he did miss a vital point. The results of the increase in temperature have been far more severe, happening sooner than he predicted. The Northwest Passage did not wait to the end of this century to open for the first time, it opened in 2007. And in 2016 it was open enough for a 1000 passenger luxury liner to transit the passage.
Speaking of widening your horizons you might familiarize yourself with Dr. Bjorn Lomborg and his views on climate change. Try it, dumb fuck.

At least I'm not stupid enough to swallow the swill put out by the global warming extremists (such as the example I provided which you absolutely ignored, like a head buried in the sand coward)
 

Forum List

Back
Top