Who Generally Votes In Mid-Terms?,Very Angry&Anti-Establishment Americans.

[TheSeventhTiger]

Just like in 2010, and just like in 2006. Those who are happy with how things are going for themselves will probably just sit it out. And those who are furious, pissed off at their President, those are the ones who will stampede to their precincts ASAP!

And Nancy Pelosi doesn't see any of this coming?

 

[Nyvin]

You make an assumption they'll be pissed of at the President. There's this certain government body that has done literally nothing this entire session...happens to be the body that has the most Tea Party members in it. Kinda had a big role in the shutdown.

People might be quite pissed at that certain government body.

 

[g5000]

Angry passionate people vote in primaries out of proportion to moderates, which is why a candidate moves toward the extremes during primary season and makes all kinds of extreme promises. If he doesn't, the maniacs draft one of their own to run against him.

This is what we saw in 2010. Coupled with the usual low voter turnout in mid-terms, maniacs get more pull than they represent in the populace as a whole.

This is why it is absolutely imperative to the Right that ObamaCare fail. That it be stopped in its tracks. And this is why its death keeps being erroneously celebrated even as it lumbers on. They know if ObamaCare gains momentum, they are doooooooooomed.

The Right is taking one gigantic gamble on ObamaCare. If it starts to succeed, it will be devastating to the GOP. Thus all the over-the-top foaming at the mouth noise about ObamaCare. Over-exaggerations and wishful thinking.


Don't count on it happening.

 

[Darkwind]

You make an assumption they'll be pissed of at the President. There's this certain government body that has done literally nothing this entire session...happens to be the body that has the most Tea Party members in it. Kinda had a big role in the shutdown.

People might be quite pissed at that certain government body.

Incorrect. The body you are referring to is the one that has hundreds of bills languishing in the leaders desk. That would be the Chamber that has the most socialists.


Given that the UCA, aka Obamacare, is literally throwing people into the cold without protection, I think that barring a major news story, 2014 will not be a good time for Democrats.

 

[The T]

You make an assumption they'll be pissed of at the President. There's this certain government body that has done literally nothing this entire session...happens to be the body that has the most Tea Party members in it. Kinda had a big role in the shutdown.

People might be quite pissed at that certain government body.

It's called the SENATE. And as to the TEA Party? Guess whom you're speaking of? The very people that are pissed...

 

[ScienceRocks]

I am pissed as infrastructure, science, tech and education is being cut because of your filthy sequester.

We will come out and vote against the shitty tea party.
Hispanics will come out pissed off and vote against you for not passing the amnesty.

fact.

 

[Xarm]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

Away from that tangent, it saddens me that those who are content wont vote, when passions rise we make rash decisions, that how the tea party got in, and that's how we are going to make things even worse.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We in the GOP have to remember that we are voting for Congress, which America absolutely hates (in great part because of TPM), not Obama.

 

[g5000]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

Bailing out Wall Street was very socialist.

As is ObamaCare.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I am pissed as infrastructure, science, tech and education is being cut because of your filthy sequester.

We will come out and vote against the shitty tea party.
Hispanics will come out pissed off and vote against you for not passing the amnesty.

fact.

Hispanics don't give a rat's ass about amnesty. Polling has repeatedly showed it's not a priority for them and your assumption that they do is one more reflection of your racist attitude towards non whites.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

I suggest you read up on how Capitalism works, dipshit, because there is no government coercion involved.

 

[Xarm]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

Bailing out Wall Street was very socialist.

As is ObamaCare.

A socialist way of doing things would be nationalizing the banks! not bailing them out. The affordable care act is not socialist because it is not a single-payer system.

 

[ScienceRocks]

So what caused Hispanics to go from 44% under Bush to 29% under Romney?

If it didn't matter why did such happen???? Racist against non-whites? I want to grant 20 million Hispanics citizen ship

 

[The T]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

I suggest you read up on how Capitalism works, dipshit, because there is no government coercion involved.

Perhaps he missed what Chavez did, and his replacement continues to do In Venezuela. It's the same road. By any stretch? It's tyranny.

 

[Xarm]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

I suggest you read up on how Capitalism works, dipshit, because there is no government coercion involved.

No government coercion? you mean anarchy? I recommend you use basic debate skills before typing anything...ever again.

 

[The T]

So what caused Hispanics to go from 44% under Bush to 29% under Romney?

If it didn't matter why did such happen???? Racist against non-whites? I want to grant 20 million Hispanics citizen ship

For what purpose? And WHY pay attention to ethnicity and NOT the individual? I suppose Dr. King's message was totally a waste on you, wasn't it?

 

[Darkwind]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

Bailing out Wall Street was very socialist.

As is ObamaCare.

A socialist way of doing things would be nationalizing the banks! not bailing them out. The affordable care act is not socialist because it is not a single-payer system.

Two things. Well, there are more, but lets not overload your ability to process a concept.

1. When you privatize profits that are then used to create law which benefits you (banks), while publicizing risk (the taxpayer paying for all losses) it is very much socialistic in nature.

2. Do not confuse a failure to achieve total socialism as a definition that they are not socialist.

 

[The T]

I am blown away by the consistent use of the word "socialism" in this forum. Obama has done nothing that is remotely socialist in his entire presidency he has consistently been reactionary, bailed out banks, forcing people to buy healthcare(which I may add is increasingly capitalist I.e. forcing people into the market).

I suggest you read up on how Capitalism works, dipshit, because there is no government coercion involved.

No government coercion? you mean anarchy? I recommend you use basic debate skills before typing anything...ever again.

How did anarchy enter into this unless you mean Obama and the Statists have introduced it into the fray by their strangling policies regarding the free market and capitalism, and killing it?

For surely if they keep it up? That's exactly what they'll have. ANARCHY...

 

[Xarm]

Bailing out Wall Street was very socialist.

As is ObamaCare.

A socialist way of doing things would be nationalizing the banks! not bailing them out. The affordable care act is not socialist because it is not a single-payer system.

Two things. Well, there are more, but lets not overload your ability to process a concept.

1. When you privatize profits that are then used to create law which benefits you (banks), while publicizing risk (the taxpayer paying for all losses) it is very much socialistic in nature.

2. Do not confuse a failure to achieve total socialism as a definition that they are not socialist.

You missed the point completely...but if you are done going on a tangent.
Let me more clearly display Obamas neo-liberal actions
Obamacare does not solve the healthcare problem but entangles it behind an insane amount of red tape that only benefits healthcare providers. It forces poor people to buy healthcare with no incentive to change how healthcare providers provide that healthcare.

The difference between nationalizing banks and bailing them out? simple. When you bail them out you are saving the company, that is government intervention to save private companies, that is far-right capitalism. Nationalizing the banks would put them under government control which is socialist in nature.

 

[Xarm]

I suggest you read up on how Capitalism works, dipshit, because there is no government coercion involved.

No government coercion? you mean anarchy? I recommend you use basic debate skills before typing anything...ever again.

How did anarchy enter into this unless you mean Obama and the Statists have introduced it into the fray by their strangling policies regarding the free market and capitalism, and killing it?

For surely if they keep it up? That's exactly what they'll have. ANARCHY...

The free market is flawed because of human nature, very little in this world should be privatized because it is EVERYBODY'S earth not just yours. The free market breeds class warfare, which breeds worker slavery in which man is alienated from himself.