Who Is Bruce Springsteen and why am I mentioning him here?

?Yeah and the probably all get high on the same kind of dope
Great, then again, they all probably wish they could get the "good stuff" that Trump uses. After all, his rants about crowds is certainly drug driven. I mean, what person dreaming about being president again would talk about crowds when his supporters need economic help to pay their bills?
 
Great, then again, they all probably wish they could get the "good stuff" that Trump uses. After all, his rants about crowds is certainly drug driven. I mean, what person dreaming about being president again would talk about crowds when his supporters need economic help to pay their bills?
Why do Americans need help paying their bills under Harris, Simp?

:oops8:
 
All of these people are superficial and full of vanity. They are hollowed out.
Seriously, Trump has Orange makeup, wears lifts in his shoes,... He is very superficial...

The ones named above are highly talented and respected through out the world...

Trump is considered a clown...
 
Data also proves we cannot build one that works, on the 2,000 mile land and river border.

Look at Trump's swipe at it. Maybe he could have done better, if not for Stevie grifting the donors.
You are a blatant liar, completely ignorant, or both. I vote the latter.


EFFECTIVE – DISRUPTING CRIMINALS AND SMUGGLERS​

The results speak for themselves: illegal drug, border crossings, and human smuggling activities have decreased in areas where barriers are deployed. For example:

San Diego Sector:

  • In one short 12 mile section in the San Diego Sector, the wall reduced CBP manpower requirements by 150 agents every 24 hours. That is approximately a $28 million return on investment per year in salaries and benefits. These agents were redeployed to fill resource gaps in other areas of the border -- further improving our security.
  • CBP’s San Diego Field Office continues to be a significant source of narcotics seizures. From FY 19 to FY 20, seizures of fentanyl, marijuana, and methamphetamine all increased, with meth seizures jumping at alarming rates in the past several years – demonstrating that the border wall is forcing drug smugglers to where we are best prepared to catch them – our ports of entry.
Yuma Sector:

  • Illegal entries in areas with new border wall system plummeted over 87% in FY 20 compared to FY 19.
  • In FY 19, CBP deployed a temporary barrier, which it has replaced with a permanent system, at the Sanchez Canal, which resulted in illegal entries decreasing in this area by more than 1,000 per month.
  • In FY 19, in areas of older existing border fencing or barriers, Yuma Sector apprehended 12 large groups (over a 100 persons) compared to zero large groups in FY 20 with new border wall system.
    • Family Unit entries have decreased over 95%
      • FY 19: 51,961 vs. FY 20: 2,940
RGV Sector:

  • In a section of RGV (Zone 1) apprehensions have decreased since the construction of the border wall system. This is a location that has never had any border infrastructure.
    • CBP has seen 79% decrease in apprehensions in this area (Zone 1) since the completion of border wall system.
    • CBP has seen a 26% decrease in narcotics seizures since the completion of border wall system in this area.
  • In another section of RGV, prior to construction of the border wall system it was common to see illegal aliens running across a heavily traveled road, putting themselves and members of the community at risk.
    • Smugglers are now forced to take their groups further west into areas that are less dense with brush and easier for CBP surveillance cameras to detect illicit activity.
El Paso Sector:

  • El Paso Sector has experienced a significant reduction in drug and smuggling activities in areas where the new border wall system was built.
    • Most notably, in Zones 14 and 15 of the Santa Teresa (STN) AOR where apprehensions have decreased by 60% and 81% respectively when comparing the last half of fiscal year FY 20 to the first half of FY 20.
  • El Paso Station has experienced similar results from the new border wall in Zones 20 – 23, with a reduction in apprehensions of 70% during the same timeframe.
 
You are a blatant liar, completely ignorant, or both. I vote the latter.


EFFECTIVE – DISRUPTING CRIMINALS AND SMUGGLERS​

The results speak for themselves: illegal drug, border crossings, and human smuggling activities have decreased in areas where barriers are deployed. For example:

San Diego Sector:

  • In one short 12 mile section in the San Diego Sector, the wall reduced CBP manpower requirements by 150 agents every 24 hours. That is approximately a $28 million return on investment per year in salaries and benefits. These agents were redeployed to fill resource gaps in other areas of the border -- further improving our security.
  • CBP’s San Diego Field Office continues to be a significant source of narcotics seizures. From FY 19 to FY 20, seizures of fentanyl, marijuana, and methamphetamine all increased, with meth seizures jumping at alarming rates in the past several years – demonstrating that the border wall is forcing drug smugglers to where we are best prepared to catch them – our ports of entry.
Yuma Sector:

  • Illegal entries in areas with new border wall system plummeted over 87% in FY 20 compared to FY 19.
  • In FY 19, CBP deployed a temporary barrier, which it has replaced with a permanent system, at the Sanchez Canal, which resulted in illegal entries decreasing in this area by more than 1,000 per month.
  • In FY 19, in areas of older existing border fencing or barriers, Yuma Sector apprehended 12 large groups (over a 100 persons) compared to zero large groups in FY 20 with new border wall system.
    • Family Unit entries have decreased over 95%
      • FY 19: 51,961 vs. FY 20: 2,940
RGV Sector:

  • In a section of RGV (Zone 1) apprehensions have decreased since the construction of the border wall system. This is a location that has never had any border infrastructure.
    • CBP has seen 79% decrease in apprehensions in this area (Zone 1) since the completion of border wall system.
    • CBP has seen a 26% decrease in narcotics seizures since the completion of border wall system in this area.
  • In another section of RGV, prior to construction of the border wall system it was common to see illegal aliens running across a heavily traveled road, putting themselves and members of the community at risk.
    • Smugglers are now forced to take their groups further west into areas that are less dense with brush and easier for CBP surveillance cameras to detect illicit activity.
El Paso Sector:

  • El Paso Sector has experienced a significant reduction in drug and smuggling activities in areas where the new border wall system was built.
    • Most notably, in Zones 14 and 15 of the Santa Teresa (STN) AOR where apprehensions have decreased by 60% and 81% respectively when comparing the last half of fiscal year FY 20 to the first half of FY 20.
  • El Paso Station has experienced similar results from the new border wall in Zones 20 – 23, with a reduction in apprehensions of 70% during the same timeframe.
Nobody disputes the hotspots. Or walls working there.



I am talking about the huge fantasy wall you are imagining.
 
Nobody disputes the hotspots. Or walls working there.



I am talking about the huge fantasy wall you are imagining.
So when you are once again proven to be an uninformed idiot, instead of addressing the facts all you can do is claim to know what I am "imagining"

What a clown. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
What really makes it for Bruce is that he is so down to earth... He genuinely a really nice guy. When he goes to Ireland he treats it like a busman holiday and enjoys himself and is so generous with his time.


There is tons of stories about him in Ireland just being his humble self.

As I said, a great ambassador for US....

Let's ask his fans if they like paying 5000 dollars a ticket?

Bruce Springsteen fans feel betrayed by high ticket prices | Los ...

 
It is not about what they provide. It is about the fact that some 20 celebrities back the Democrats and zero celebrities back the Republicans. Celebrities are used to sell products successfully all the time (just turn on your TV).

So my question to you is "why are there NO celebrities doing that for the Republicans and "so many" doing so for the Republicans"?

I mean, these are all Americans, no? Known Americans that have a big voice . Why no voices (except that of lowly minions) are talking in favor of the right?




:rolleyes:

1724893700307.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top