🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Who Owns Your Children?

1. This is the most disgusting post you have ever offered....if you thought it funny to conflate the United States to the Nazis.....it isn't.


2. 'Wounded Knee' is not what the America haters taught you it was.

Pop culture unfailingly paints the army as brutal killers, as in the famous South Dakota Wounded Knee ‘massacre,’ December 29, 1890. Robert Marshall Utley (born in 1929) is an author and historian who has written sixteen books on the history of the American West, including The Last Days of the Sioux Nation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1963) in which he concludes that “the Indians fired at least 50 shots before the troops returned fire.”


You've become a disgusting little twerp.
You're a real pice aren't you. According to commanding Gen. Nelson A. Miles
who was actually there "half the Indian men were killed or wounded before they had a chance to get off any shots." and "While the Indian warriors and soldiers were shooting at close range, other soldiers used the Hotchkiss guns against the tipi camp full of women and children."


I've provided three or four sources that correct your misinterpretation.

Read them...and take notes.
So you have 4 sources that contradict mine but I can show 400 that support mine. Mine also came from actual eyewitnessess and people who were around at the time. Even your sources contradict each other. One says the first shot was by an Indian and another source says 50 shots were fired before the calvary opened up. Neither of us were there so who fired first is left up to the actual eyewitnesses but there is no debate that the calvary killed unarmed women and children. I don't know about you but that unsettles me.


You'd have a leg to stand on if the 400 sources you claim weren't all Liberals, academics, how share the hate-America doctrine.
 
. I don't know about you but that unsettles me.

dear, everything about the way indians were treated is unsettling, but the 19th Century world was a very different place.
I can bring up scores on non native related attocities the US was involved in. Believe me you don't want to go there. It's best that you move on and keep your head in denial. And don't call me dear.
 
1. This is the most disgusting post you have ever offered....if you thought it funny to conflate the United States to the Nazis.....it isn't.


2. 'Wounded Knee' is not what the America haters taught you it was.

Pop culture unfailingly paints the army as brutal killers, as in the famous South Dakota Wounded Knee ‘massacre,’ December 29, 1890. Robert Marshall Utley (born in 1929) is an author and historian who has written sixteen books on the history of the American West, including The Last Days of the Sioux Nation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1963) in which he concludes that “the Indians fired at least 50 shots before the troops returned fire.”


You've become a disgusting little twerp.
You're a real pice aren't you. According to commanding Gen. Nelson A. Miles
who was actually there "half the Indian men were killed or wounded before they had a chance to get off any shots." and "While the Indian warriors and soldiers were shooting at close range, other soldiers used the Hotchkiss guns against the tipi camp full of women and children."


I've provided three or four sources that correct your misinterpretation.

Read them...and take notes.
So you have 4 sources that contradict mine but I can show 400 that support mine. Mine also came from actual eyewitnessess and people who were around at the time. Even your sources contradict each other. One says the first shot was by an Indian and another source says 50 shots were fired before the calvary opened up. Neither of us were there so who fired first is left up to the actual eyewitnesses but there is no debate that the calvary killed unarmed women and children. I don't know about you but that unsettles me.


You'd have a leg to stand on if the 400 sources you claim weren't all Liberals, academics, how share the hate-America doctrine.
People only hate america because of such attrocities.
 
What's curious is that these "disgusted" America-hating libs are free to leave at any time but don't.

perhaps they cant find a major country that had fewer atrocities? Hitler Stalin and Mao's 200 million dead atrocities don't matter to them since they were conducted in the name of liberalism!!
 
1. This is the most disgusting post you have ever offered....if you thought it funny to conflate the United States to the Nazis.....it isn't.


2. 'Wounded Knee' is not what the America haters taught you it was.

Pop culture unfailingly paints the army as brutal killers, as in the famous South Dakota Wounded Knee ‘massacre,’ December 29, 1890. Robert Marshall Utley (born in 1929) is an author and historian who has written sixteen books on the history of the American West, including The Last Days of the Sioux Nation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1963) in which he concludes that “the Indians fired at least 50 shots before the troops returned fire.”


You've become a disgusting little twerp.
You're a real pice aren't you. According to commanding Gen. Nelson A. Miles
who was actually there "half the Indian men were killed or wounded before they had a chance to get off any shots." and "While the Indian warriors and soldiers were shooting at close range, other soldiers used the Hotchkiss guns against the tipi camp full of women and children."


I've provided three or four sources that correct your misinterpretation.

Read them...and take notes.
So you have 4 sources that contradict mine but I can show 400 that support mine. Mine also came from actual eyewitnessess and people who were around at the time. Even your sources contradict each other. One says the first shot was by an Indian and another source says 50 shots were fired before the calvary opened up. Neither of us were there so who fired first is left up to the actual eyewitnesses but there is no debate that the calvary killed unarmed women and children. I don't know about you but that unsettles me.

You're letting her 'win' the argument by letting her fallaciously frame the argument. It is irrelevant who fired first. It was an intentional massacre of innocents;

if that occurred as a retaliation for shots fired by an Indian, it is no less an atrocity.
 
If the far left has their way your children will be owned by the government through a cradle to grave systems designed to dictate their entire lives to them..
 
b. ... Bender wants to subordinate American identity to a cosmopolitan, “transnational” sensibility. ...Whereas the old U.S. history forged a shared national identity by emphasizing America’s distinctiveness, Bender hopes to encourage cosmopolitanism by “internationalizing” the American story.... Bender laments that history as taught in our schools has bred an “acceptance of the nation as the dominant form of human solidarity.”"

By telling us that an Italian discovered America. A lie and there was no Italy in 1492...
Don't be hatin' on Columbus! He got the Spanish to fund three failed trips to a place he never made it to. Two of them after he lied about the first place he went. He made Zig Ziglar look like an amateur. He invented the 'but wait there's more' angle 400 years before Ron Popeil was itching his daddy's pant.That man was a fucking genus.
 

Forum List

Back
Top