Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
Liberals keep making this statement and I get crickets when I point out the issue is not that the embassy was attacked, it was that they asked for help and didn't get it then the White House covered it up.
Your statement there were "52" attacks under W is meaningless because that isn't anyone's issue. The question is, which of those attack(s) are you comparing to what the Obama administration did to Benghazi specifically, and why?
The birthers applaud you.
And if Bush's disaster in Iraq wasn't the biggest scandal since Watergate, and you and your pals on the right will never concede that it was,
then NOTHING, by those standards, has been a scandal in the Obama administration.
Both parties authorized and funded the disaster in Iraq. They are all responsible.
Blaming it all on Bush is nothing but partisan bullshit and lies.
Ok. Let's blame 95% of it on Bush.
And then we'll compare that to 0% blame on Obama for the birther nonsense, the IRS nonsense, and the Benghazi nonsense.
Both parties authorized and funded the disaster in Iraq. They are all responsible.
Blaming it all on Bush is nothing but partisan bullshit and lies.
Ok. Let's blame 95% of it on Bush.
And then we'll compare that to 0% blame on Obama for the birther nonsense, the IRS nonsense, and the Benghazi nonsense.
Let me be more precise. I fault Obama for ever getting us involved in Libya in the first place.
Who cares about how 4 embassy employees in Benghazi who were killed by rebels that the Obama administration armed.
Who cares about the IRS targeting every rightwing talk show host or PAC that donates to conservatives.
Who cares that the DoJ is shaking down banks, insurance companies, and big businesses for cash through lawsuits.
Who cares that guns the Obama Administration gave to drug cartels are still turning up at crime scenes along the border.
Who cares that the Administration refuses to enforce our laws or enforces them selectively.
Who cares that our government has brought down several dictators in the Middle East and allowed Islamic radicals to take over in their place.
Who cares that not only is the Administration allowing Iran, our mortal enemy, to continue building nukes, but they're also scaring everyone else in the region into wanting them for their own defense, seeing as how they can't count on us to protect them anymore.
Obama likes the fact that more are not working than in the last 30 years. For every job created last month 5 people dropped out of the workforce and cannot be counted as part of the ever growing terminally unemployed. Obama sees this as progress, a strong economy, strengthening the Middle-Class. He claims that unemployment is good for the economy. His primary concern isn't that more aren't working but that they aren't all making the same income. He says that his website isn't indicative of the mess his administration has become. The fact that not only can't he be trusted to keep his promises but even when he does do what he says he'll do it always turns into a hassle to everyone involved.
Who cares that with every new rule or regulation the costs of running a business goes up astronomically and the costs to the consumer goes up as well. Who cares that the EPA is intentionally driving the costs of energy through the roof.
Who cares.
The worst thing you could do is hold up traffic in NYC. This is the worst thing you can ever do. This is just the tip of the iceberg folks. More will come out about this, they promise us. This is one seriously huge scandal of all scandals. Somebody cause a traffic jam on the GWB and people died, or at least probably died. This can't happen in America. But when it comes to national security and the stagnant economy. Who cares.
See, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue
I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.
Before [MENTION=42632]Kosh[/MENTION] gets here..."All far left propaganda"
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
Liberals keep making this statement and I get crickets when I point out the issue is not that the embassy was attacked, it was that they asked for help and didn't get it then the White House covered it up.
Your statement there were "52" attacks under W is meaningless because that isn't anyone's issue. The question is, which of those attack(s) are you comparing to what the Obama administration did to Benghazi specifically, and why?
The Republican outrage for the 52 attacks was nowhere to be found.
We have something like 500 threads on Ben-gotcha alone on this message board. If you guys are that interested in us being attacked, there should have been thousands about the Bush attacks.
Regardless, Ben-gotcha will not be a factor in 2016.
See, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue
I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.
Before [MENTION=42632]Kosh[/MENTION] gets here..."All far left propaganda"
The ironic part is that is was posted by a far left Obama drone.
If you far left Obama drones don't want to be called out on it, then I suggest you don't post your far left propaganda. Posting means that you have nothing you want to discuss or debate, you just want to push an agenda.
See, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue
I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.
Before [MENTION=42632]Kosh[/MENTION] gets here..."All far left propaganda"
The ironic part is that is was posted by a far left Obama drone.
If you far left Obama drones don't want to be called out on it, then I suggest you don't post your far left propaganda. Posting means that you have nothing you want to discuss or debate, you just want to push an agenda.
Liberals keep making this statement and I get crickets when I point out the issue is not that the embassy was attacked, it was that they asked for help and didn't get it then the White House covered it up.
Your statement there were "52" attacks under W is meaningless because that isn't anyone's issue. The question is, which of those attack(s) are you comparing to what the Obama administration did to Benghazi specifically, and why?
The Republican outrage for the 52 attacks was nowhere to be found.
We have something like 500 threads on Ben-gotcha alone on this message board. If you guys are that interested in us being attacked, there should have been thousands about the Bush attacks.
Regardless, Ben-gotcha will not be a factor in 2016.
Oh look more far left propaganda with the Booooooooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhh defense.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
Liberals keep making this statement and I get crickets when I point out the issue is not that the embassy was attacked, it was that they asked for help and didn't get it then the White House covered it up.
Your statement there were "52" attacks under W is meaningless because that isn't anyone's issue. The question is, which of those attack(s) are you comparing to what the Obama administration did to Benghazi specifically, and why?
People were killed...
Before [MENTION=42632]Kosh[/MENTION] gets here..."All far left propaganda"
The ironic part is that is was posted by a far left Obama drone.
If you far left Obama drones don't want to be called out on it, then I suggest you don't post your far left propaganda. Posting means that you have nothing you want to discuss or debate, you just want to push an agenda.
Who cares about how 4 embassy employees in Benghazi who were killed by rebels that the Obama administration armed.
Who cares about the IRS targeting every rightwing talk show host or PAC that donates to conservatives.
Who cares that the DoJ is shaking down banks, insurance companies, and big businesses for cash through lawsuits.
Who cares that guns the Obama Administration gave to drug cartels are still turning up at crime scenes along the border.
Who cares that the Administration refuses to enforce our laws or enforces them selectively.
Who cares that our government has brought down several dictators in the Middle East and allowed Islamic radicals to take over in their place.
Who cares that not only is the Administration allowing Iran, our mortal enemy, to continue building nukes, but they're also scaring everyone else in the region into wanting them for their own defense, seeing as how they can't count on us to protect them anymore.
Obama likes the fact that more are not working than in the last 30 years. For every job created last month 5 people dropped out of the workforce and cannot be counted as part of the ever growing terminally unemployed. Obama sees this as progress, a strong economy, strengthening the Middle-Class. He claims that unemployment is good for the economy. His primary concern isn't that more aren't working but that they aren't all making the same income. He says that his website isn't indicative of the mess his administration has become. The fact that not only can't he be trusted to keep his promises but even when he does do what he says he'll do it always turns into a hassle to everyone involved.
Who cares that with every new rule or regulation the costs of running a business goes up astronomically and the costs to the consumer goes up as well. Who cares that the EPA is intentionally driving the costs of energy through the roof.
Who cares.
The worst thing you could do is hold up traffic in NYC. This is the worst thing you can ever do. This is just the tip of the iceberg folks. More will come out about this, they promise us. This is one seriously huge scandal of all scandals. Somebody cause a traffic jam on the GWB and people died, or at least probably died. This can't happen in America. But when it comes to national security and the stagnant economy. Who cares.
See, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue
I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.
The Republican outrage for the 52 attacks was nowhere to be found.
We have something like 500 threads on Ben-gotcha alone on this message board. If you guys are that interested in us being attacked, there should have been thousands about the Bush attacks.
Regardless, Ben-gotcha will not be a factor in 2016.
Oh look more far left propaganda with the Booooooooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhh defense.
Well, when a new goalie comes in to the soccer match, her stats are most often compared to the goalie she replaced. It's no different with Presidents. Who should we compare Obama's record/the GOP intellectual dishonesty to?
I know rightSee, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue
I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.
Before [MENTION=42632]Kosh[/MENTION] gets here..."All far left propaganda"
That guy is seriously a light weight, deflection bot. Quelle surprise!!! A rw'er too 
The Republican outrage for the 52 attacks was nowhere to be found.
We have something like 500 threads on Ben-gotcha alone on this message board. If you guys are that interested in us being attacked, there should have been thousands about the Bush attacks.
Regardless, Ben-gotcha will not be a factor in 2016.
Oh look more far left propaganda with the Booooooooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhh defense.
Well, when a new goalie comes in to the soccer match, her stats are most often compared to the goalie she replaced. It's no different with Presidents. Who should we compare Obama's record/the GOP intellectual dishonesty to?
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
I know rightSee, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue
I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.
Before [MENTION=42632]Kosh[/MENTION] gets here..."All far left propaganda"
As to the evidence above, yeah, it speaks for itself
1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
Liberals keep making this statement and I get crickets when I point out the issue is not that the embassy was attacked, it was that they asked for help and didn't get it then the White House covered it up.
Your statement there were "52" attacks under W is meaningless because that isn't anyone's issue. The question is, which of those attack(s) are you comparing to what the Obama administration did to Benghazi specifically, and why?
The Republican outrage for the 52 attacks was nowhere to be found.
We have something like 500 threads on Ben-gotcha alone on this message board. If you guys are that interested in us being attacked, there should have been thousands about the Bush attacks.
Regardless, Ben-gotcha will not be a factor in 2016.
The Republican outrage for the 52 attacks was nowhere to be found.
We have something like 500 threads on Ben-gotcha alone on this message board. If you guys are that interested in us being attacked, there should have been thousands about the Bush attacks.
Regardless, Ben-gotcha will not be a factor in 2016.
Oh look more far left propaganda with the Booooooooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhh defense.
Well, when a new goalie comes in to the soccer match, her stats are most often compared to the goalie she replaced. It's no different with Presidents. Who should we compare Obama's record/the GOP intellectual dishonesty to?
