Who will be Hillary's running mate?

0414-clinton-castro-ticket_1.jpg


I'm thinking Julian Castro. The guy is a family man and a brilliant speaker. Let's get him on the ticket and groom him for after Hillary.

or

140423222745-cnn-tonight-intv-warren-hillary-clinton-presidency-00004513-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg


Elizabeth Warren. She would certainly bring in the Bernie Sanders voters.

Anyone else?


Since Karl Marx is dead and Comrade Sanders believes that she is not socialist enough then I believe Elizabeth Warren would have been Karl Marx's choice.
 
0414-clinton-castro-ticket_1.jpg


I'm thinking Julian Castro. The guy is a family man and a brilliant speaker. Let's get him on the ticket and groom him for after Hillary.

or

140423222745-cnn-tonight-intv-warren-hillary-clinton-presidency-00004513-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg


Elizabeth Warren. She would certainly bring in the Bernie Sanders voters.

Anyone else?
I would say Castro....just the last name will get the commie lovers running. If she was smart I would say she should pick Sanders because I think a LARGE chunk of his supporters won't back her.
 
Juanita Broaddrick would love to run.....over hiLIARy.
 
Bottom line may be this: Republicans will NOT see the inside of the oval office for a decade...In the next couple of decades, Texas will turn purple and eventually blue....and without Texas (and Florida), the GOP may never hold the executive branch unless they radically change from backing tea sippers. For this year, however, the senate will turn "blue", but the House will remain in GOP hands.
Actually, it got redder after the 2012 election. 2016 senate looking like 48-47 Rs with 5 tossups and 3 of those favor the Rs. 2018 will be a brutal year for dems as they are defending 23 seats in red states.
Talking about now and the future, podjo, not back when. The Dems could win up to 54 Senate seats and severely injure the House GOP majority if Trump is the candidate. He will hurt down ballot severely.

Nat is absolutely right about the bluing and purpling of America if the GOP does not change its strange.
 
Mexico is really trying to get Castro. They really don't care that Hispanics are not monolithic. Many Hispanics don't like Mexicans. MS-13 started out as El Salvadoran gangs fighting Mexicans in Hispanic neighborhoods.

It would make for a good litmus test. Build the wall v. No border at all. See how that goes.
 
Bottom line may be this: Republicans will NOT see the inside of the oval office for a decade...In the next couple of decades, Texas will turn purple and eventually blue....and without Texas (and Florida), the GOP may never hold the executive branch unless they radically change from backing tea sippers. For this year, however, the senate will turn "blue", but the House will remain in GOP hands.
Actually, it got redder after the 2012 election. 2016 senate looking like 48-47 Rs with 5 tossups and 3 of those favor the Rs. 2018 will be a brutal year for dems as they are defending 23 seats in red states.
Talking about now and the future, podjo, not back when. The Dems could win up to 54 Senate seats and severely injure the House GOP majority if Trump is the candidate. He will hurt down ballot severely.

Nat is absolutely right about the bluing and purpling of America if the GOP does not change its strange.
If Trump is not the candidste, the Democrats win it all in a landslide that has never happened before.
 
Bottom line may be this: Republicans will NOT see the inside of the oval office for a decade...In the next couple of decades, Texas will turn purple and eventually blue....and without Texas (and Florida), the GOP may never hold the executive branch unless they radically change from backing tea sippers. For this year, however, the senate will turn "blue", but the House will remain in GOP hands.
Actually, it got redder after the 2012 election. 2016 senate looking like 48-47 Rs with 5 tossups and 3 of those favor the Rs. 2018 will be a brutal year for dems as they are defending 23 seats in red states.
Talking about now and the future, podjo, not back when. The Dems could win up to 54 Senate seats and severely injure the House GOP majority if Trump is the candidate. He will hurt down ballot severely.

Nat is absolutely right about the bluing and purpling of America if the GOP does not change its strange.
If Trump is not the candidste, the Democrats win it all in a landslide that has never happened before.
You mean if Trump IS the candidate . . . look up the election results of 1936.
 
Bottom line may be this: Republicans will NOT see the inside of the oval office for a decade...In the next couple of decades, Texas will turn purple and eventually blue....and without Texas (and Florida), the GOP may never hold the executive branch unless they radically change from backing tea sippers. For this year, however, the senate will turn "blue", but the House will remain in GOP hands.
Actually, it got redder after the 2012 election. 2016 senate looking like 48-47 Rs with 5 tossups and 3 of those favor the Rs. 2018 will be a brutal year for dems as they are defending 23 seats in red states.
Talking about now and the future, podjo, not back when. The Dems could win up to 54 Senate seats and severely injure the House GOP majority if Trump is the candidate. He will hurt down ballot severely.

Nat is absolutely right about the bluing and purpling of America if the GOP does not change its strange.


I agree. The cons will lose more of their constituency as they become more liberal.
 
Bottom line may be this: Republicans will NOT see the inside of the oval office for a decade...In the next couple of decades, Texas will turn purple and eventually blue....and without Texas (and Florida), the GOP may never hold the executive branch unless they radically change from backing tea sippers. For this year, however, the senate will turn "blue", but the House will remain in GOP hands.
Actually, it got redder after the 2012 election. 2016 senate looking like 48-47 Rs with 5 tossups and 3 of those favor the Rs. 2018 will be a brutal year for dems as they are defending 23 seats in red states.
Talking about now and the future, podjo, not back when. The Dems could win up to 54 Senate seats and severely injure the House GOP majority if Trump is the candidate. He will hurt down ballot severely.

Nat is absolutely right about the bluing and purpling of America if the GOP does not change its strange.


I agree. The cons will lose more of their constituency as they become more liberal.
No, they would lose even more if they moved farther to the right.
 
George Soros spoke to Jammie-Jake in a dream and STILL wouldn't tell the little fella who he (Soros) is going to command The Democrat Party to nominate. Worse, not a single word about who gets to go down in flames as the "running mate".

But George did congratulate the Obamacare poster boy on his outfit.....

Jammie-Jake-copy.jpg
 
Bottom line may be this: Republicans will NOT see the inside of the oval office for a decade...In the next couple of decades, Texas will turn purple and eventually blue....and without Texas (and Florida), the GOP may never hold the executive branch unless they radically change from backing tea sippers. For this year, however, the senate will turn "blue", but the House will remain in GOP hands.
Actually, it got redder after the 2012 election. 2016 senate looking like 48-47 Rs with 5 tossups and 3 of those favor the Rs. 2018 will be a brutal year for dems as they are defending 23 seats in red states.
Talking about now and the future, podjo, not back when. The Dems could win up to 54 Senate seats and severely injure the House GOP majority if Trump is the candidate. He will hurt down ballot severely.

Nat is absolutely right about the bluing and purpling of America if the GOP does not change its strange.


I agree. The cons will lose more of their constituency as they become more liberal.
No, they would lose even more if they moved farther to the right.

Are you seriously claiming the GOP is right-wing?

Are you high?
 
Crooked Hillary will not be the Dem nominee.

Bernie's VP will be Anthony Weiner.

You have the Jew old boring policy wonk, then you have the Jew with the personality...
 
http://theslot.jezebel.com/hillary-clintons-short-list-for-vice-president-will-inc-1772249781

In an interview with the Boston Globe, John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, indicated that her short list for potential running mates will definitely include women. “We’ll start with a broad list and then begin to narrow it. But there is no question that there will be women on that list,” Podesta said.

They will start with a broad list. Then they will make a guy list.
 
It is funny seeing the emotionally crushed state of the far right wingers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top