Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Don't confuse Roman Catholic faith with Islam. Jesus was not a political and military leader. Mohammad was. From its inception government, law, and religion are inseparable and NO Muslim can put the Constitution before their faith. Has nothing in common with JFK and campaign 1960.The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE.That has nothing to do with the idea that a Muslim may be elected president. It is fundamentally counter to US values to disqualify a candidate because of their religion. It is nor more or less disgusting for the right to do it here than it was for the left that did it to Romney because he was a Mormon.http://www.amazon.com/Bernard-Lewis/e/B000AP9JRK
I suggest that liberals and idiots like Joe Scarborough, who criticized Dr. Carson for his comments, read Dr. Bernard Lewis of Princeton. There is no separation of Church and state according to Islam. A republican democracy is impossible in the Muslim world. (please don't throw Turkey at me...a total joke)
Further, to be a Muslim does not mean that you believe that there is no separation of church and state. There is no homogeneous Christian belief on government and no homogeneous belief from Muslims either. Faith, and its precepts, are a VERY personal matter. It is certainly valid to point out the generally held belief from Muslims that Muslim law should be the law of the land if one were to be running and then ask them how they viewed it. It is also reasonable to not elect one because they hold such a view. It is not, however, reasonable to simply assume such and say they are unqualified simply because they are Muslim.
Most of those claiming that a Muslim is unfit for the office are NOT doing so because of what Muslims believe - they are saying so simply because they are Muslims and then trying to justify the bigotry afterword.
Shades of the campaign against John F. Kennedy.
"No Catholic can be President because they would not defy the Pope to enforce the Constitution"
Same religious bigots- different religion.
This has nothing to do with the Constitution...its about tenets of Islam.I love the American right wing.
To defend the constitution and democracy, the deny the rights laid out in the constitution and demand an end to democratic principles.
Te stupidity is flabbergasting.
Can a Jew be President?The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE.That has nothing to do with the idea that a Muslim may be elected president. It is fundamentally counter to US values to disqualify a candidate because of their religion. It is nor more or less disgusting for the right to do it here than it was for the left that did it to Romney because he was a Mormon.http://www.amazon.com/Bernard-Lewis/e/B000AP9JRK
I suggest that liberals and idiots like Joe Scarborough, who criticized Dr. Carson for his comments, read Dr. Bernard Lewis of Princeton. There is no separation of Church and state according to Islam. A republican democracy is impossible in the Muslim world. (please don't throw Turkey at me...a total joke)
Further, to be a Muslim does not mean that you believe that there is no separation of church and state. There is no homogeneous Christian belief on government and no homogeneous belief from Muslims either. Faith, and its precepts, are a VERY personal matter. It is certainly valid to point out the generally held belief from Muslims that Muslim law should be the law of the land if one were to be running and then ask them how they viewed it. It is also reasonable to not elect one because they hold such a view. It is not, however, reasonable to simply assume such and say they are unqualified simply because they are Muslim.
Most of those claiming that a Muslim is unfit for the office are NOT doing so because of what Muslims believe - they are saying so simply because they are Muslims and then trying to justify the bigotry afterword.
Don't confuse Roman Catholic faith with Islam. Jesus was not a political and military leader. Mohammad was. From its inception government, law, and religion are inseparable and NO Muslim can put the Constitution before their faith. Has nothing in common with JFK and campaign 1960.The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE.That has nothing to do with the idea that a Muslim may be elected president. It is fundamentally counter to US values to disqualify a candidate because of their religion. It is nor more or less disgusting for the right to do it here than it was for the left that did it to Romney because he was a Mormon.http://www.amazon.com/Bernard-Lewis/e/B000AP9JRK
I suggest that liberals and idiots like Joe Scarborough, who criticized Dr. Carson for his comments, read Dr. Bernard Lewis of Princeton. There is no separation of Church and state according to Islam. A republican democracy is impossible in the Muslim world. (please don't throw Turkey at me...a total joke)
Further, to be a Muslim does not mean that you believe that there is no separation of church and state. There is no homogeneous Christian belief on government and no homogeneous belief from Muslims either. Faith, and its precepts, are a VERY personal matter. It is certainly valid to point out the generally held belief from Muslims that Muslim law should be the law of the land if one were to be running and then ask them how they viewed it. It is also reasonable to not elect one because they hold such a view. It is not, however, reasonable to simply assume such and say they are unqualified simply because they are Muslim.
Most of those claiming that a Muslim is unfit for the office are NOT doing so because of what Muslims believe - they are saying so simply because they are Muslims and then trying to justify the bigotry afterword.
Shades of the campaign against John F. Kennedy.
"No Catholic can be President because they would not defy the Pope to enforce the Constitution"
Same religious bigots- different religion.
This has nothing to do with the Constitution...its about tenets of Islam.I love the American right wing.
To defend the constitution and democracy, the deny the rights laid out in the constitution and demand an end to democratic principles.
Te stupidity is flabbergasting.
I am Catholic dummy.Don't confuse Roman Catholic faith with Islam. Jesus was not a political and military leader. Mohammad was. From its inception government, law, and religion are inseparable and NO Muslim can put the Constitution before their faith. Has nothing in common with JFK and campaign 1960.The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN ULThat has nothing to do with the idea that a Muslim may be elected president. It is fundamentally counter to US values to disqualify a candidate because of their religion. It is nor more or less disgusting for the right to do it here than it was for the left that did it to Romney because he was a Mormon.http://www.amazon.com/Bernard-Lewis/e/B000AP9JRK
I suggest that liberals and idiots like Joe Scarborough, who criticized Dr. Carson for his comments, read Dr. Bernard Lewis of Princeton. There is no separation of Church and state according to Islam. A republican democracy is impossible in the Muslim world. (please don't throw Turkey at me...a total joke)
Further, to be a Muslim does not mean that you believe that there is no separation of church and state. There is no homogeneous Christian belief on government and no homogeneous belief from Muslims either. Faith, and its precepts, are a VERY personal matter. It is certainly valid to point out the generally held belief from Muslims that Muslim law should be the law of the land if one were to be running and then ask them how they viewed it. It is also reasonable to not elect one because they hold such a view. It is not, however, reasonable to simply assume such and say they are unqualified simply because they are Muslim.
Most of those claiming that a Muslim is unfit for the office are NOT doing so because of what Muslims believe - they are saying so simply because they are Muslims and then trying to justify the bigotry afterword.
Shades of the campaign against John F. Kennedy.
"No Catholic can be President because they would not defy the Pope to enforce the Constitution"
Same religious bigots- different religion.
Nothing in common other than you sound just like the anti-Catholic bigots of the day.
Making the same kind of arguments.
Just the usual anti-religious bigotry that happens throughout our history- against Jews, Catholics, Mormons, Muslims- different decade- different bigotry.
This has nothing to do with the Constitution...its about tenets of Islam.I love the American right wing.
To defend the constitution and democracy, the deny the rights laid out in the constitution and demand an end to democratic principles.
Te stupidity is flabbergasting.
Constitution: Article VI: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby”
Shariah: “The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah.” (a1.1, Umdat al-salik or The Reliance of the Traveller, commonly accepted work of Shariah jurisprudence); “There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.” (Seyed Qutb); “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” (Seyed Abul A’ala Maududi)
I am Catholic dummy.Don't confuse Roman Catholic faith with Islam. Jesus was not a political and military leader. Mohammad was. From its inception government, law, and religion are inseparable and NO Muslim can put the Constitution before their faith. Has nothing in common with JFK and campaign 1960.The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN ULThat has nothing to do with the idea that a Muslim may be elected president. It is fundamentally counter to US values to disqualify a candidate because of their religion. It is nor more or less disgusting for the right to do it here than it was for the left that did it to Romney because he was a Mormon.
Further, to be a Muslim does not mean that you believe that there is no separation of church and state. There is no homogeneous Christian belief on government and no homogeneous belief from Muslims either. Faith, and its precepts, are a VERY personal matter. It is certainly valid to point out the generally held belief from Muslims that Muslim law should be the law of the land if one were to be running and then ask them how they viewed it. It is also reasonable to not elect one because they hold such a view. It is not, however, reasonable to simply assume such and say they are unqualified simply because they are Muslim.
Most of those claiming that a Muslim is unfit for the office are NOT doing so because of what Muslims believe - they are saying so simply because they are Muslims and then trying to justify the bigotry afterword.
Shades of the campaign against John F. Kennedy.
"No Catholic can be President because they would not defy the Pope to enforce the Constitution"
Same religious bigots- different religion.
Nothing in common other than you sound just like the anti-Catholic bigots of the day.
Making the same kind of arguments.
Just the usual anti-religious bigotry that happens throughout our history- against Jews, Catholics, Mormons, Muslims- different decade- different bigotry.
It's about the tenets of Islam you idiot and how THEY preclude a Muslim from upholding the Constitution.This has nothing to do with the Constitution...its about tenets of Islam.I love the American right wing.
To defend the constitution and democracy, the deny the rights laid out in the constitution and demand an end to democratic principles.
Te stupidity is flabbergasting.
The constitution guarantees freedom of religion, something you seek to deny.
You are a traitor to America.
Constitution: Article VI: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby”
Shariah: “The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah.” (a1.1, Umdat al-salik or The Reliance of the Traveller, commonly accepted work of Shariah jurisprudence); “There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.” (Seyed Qutb); “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” (Seyed Abul A’ala Maududi)
I am Catholic dummy.Don't confuse Roman Catholic faith with Islam. Jesus was not a political and military leader. Mohammad was. From its inception government, law, and religion are inseparable and NO Muslim can put the Constitution before their faith. Has nothing in common with JFK and campaign 1960.The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN UL
Shades of the campaign against John F. Kennedy.
"No Catholic can be President because they would not defy the Pope to enforce the Constitution"
Same religious bigots- different religion.
Nothing in common other than you sound just like the anti-Catholic bigots of the day.
Making the same kind of arguments.
Just the usual anti-religious bigotry that happens throughout our history- against Jews, Catholics, Mormons, Muslims- different decade- different bigotry.
Is that pile of crap supposed to mean something to anyone but you?[/QUOTE
This Book is not to be doubted.... As for the unbelievers, it is the same whether or not you forewarn them; they will not have faith. God has set a seal upon their hearts and ears; their sight is dimmed and grievous punishment awaits them.
Quran 2:1/2:6-2:10;
This Book is not to be doubted.... As for the unbelievers, it is the same whether or not you forewarn them; they will not have faith. God has set a seal upon their hearts and ears; their sight is dimmed and grievous punishment awaits them.
Quran 2:1/2:6-2:10;
Only if YOU are defining their faith.The reason a Muslim could NOT be a POTUS is because they would have to defy Islam to enforce Constitution. No Muslim can do that and be true to the tenets of their faith. SO THEY WONT RUN UNLESS THEY HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE.That has nothing to do with the idea that a Muslim may be elected president. It is fundamentally counter to US values to disqualify a candidate because of their religion. It is nor more or less disgusting for the right to do it here than it was for the left that did it to Romney because he was a Mormon.http://www.amazon.com/Bernard-Lewis/e/B000AP9JRK
I suggest that liberals and idiots like Joe Scarborough, who criticized Dr. Carson for his comments, read Dr. Bernard Lewis of Princeton. There is no separation of Church and state according to Islam. A republican democracy is impossible in the Muslim world. (please don't throw Turkey at me...a total joke)
Further, to be a Muslim does not mean that you believe that there is no separation of church and state. There is no homogeneous Christian belief on government and no homogeneous belief from Muslims either. Faith, and its precepts, are a VERY personal matter. It is certainly valid to point out the generally held belief from Muslims that Muslim law should be the law of the land if one were to be running and then ask them how they viewed it. It is also reasonable to not elect one because they hold such a view. It is not, however, reasonable to simply assume such and say they are unqualified simply because they are Muslim.
Most of those claiming that a Muslim is unfit for the office are NOT doing so because of what Muslims believe - they are saying so simply because they are Muslims and then trying to justify the bigotry afterword.
"Believers, if you yield to the infidels they will drag you back to unbelief and you will return headlong to perdition. . . .We will put terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. . . . The Fire shall be their home" (3:149-51).
Cannot put Constitution before Islam.
Islam , Christians , Jewish, it's all pretty much the same Old Testament
You are rapidly gaining a reputation as the most ignorant 'tard here. Keep going. Remind us how Christians have Old Testament beliefs.
You wouldnt know the Old Testament from an Old Testacle.
It's about the tenets of Islam you idiot and how THEY preclude a Muslim from upholding the Constitution.
