Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I believe is that we should significantly raise wages of all workers.
Okay... For the sake of argument, let's take your idea further.... Let's raise the mandatory federal minimum wage to $100 per hour. I think we can all agree that is a significant raise in wages... correct?
So tell me... Why is that a bad idea?GO!
Raising the federal mandatory minimum to $17.00 would be fantastic, especially with the upcoming stock market downturn.
The better would be my $23.50/hr plan.
-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.
-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2016 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.
-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
-Companies with 600 employees or less, employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.
-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2015 price structure.
-Remove the FICA limit.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
-Make inversion illegal.
My plan would reduce small business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 20%-30% drop.
My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.
My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.
My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.
My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.
Ya know. I keep hearing from fake conservatives about how we spend too much on welfare. Welfare would cause taxes to raise. Poor people want to steal more of my money. Blah, blah, blah.
Some interesting statistics:
Finland spends 3.2% of its federal budget on public assistance.
Great Britain spends a little over 4.6%
Israel spends 2.4%
Norway spends a whopping 6.2%.
And the US? 0.7%. That's it.
So, why can't we just increase that to 2%? We can take that 2% away from our bloated military budget. It would still make us the Western nation that spends the least amount of money on their poor, but imagine the massive effect that would have on poverty in this country. And it wouldn't even cost the tax payers one. Red. Cent. more than they are paying, now. Because I'm not suggesting increasing the budget. I'm suggesting giving public assistance a slightly larger piece of the existing budget.
Why is that such an outrageous idea?
Have you ever asked yourself why so much U.S. money is kept offshore?-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
Oh yeah....chronic unemployment sure is "fantastic". That is - if you are a Dumbocrat elite in Washington that wants and needs everyone living on the government plantation.Raising the federal mandatory minimum to $17.00 would be fantastic, especially with the upcoming stock market downturn. The better would be my $23.50/hr plan.
Oh....so eliminate the free market and implement communism. Yeah...because centralized planning has been such a success around the world - Cuba, Cambodia, Ethiopia, U.S.S.R., Vietnam, etc. Idiot.-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
Art. I, Sec 8, Cl. 1= to spend for the common defense and general welfare
In other words - you want to completely collapse the U.S. economy immediately. Then you'll falsely blame it on the capitalism that you outlawed and tried to implement socialism.-Raising the federal mandatory minimum to $17.00 would be fantastic, especially with the upcoming stock market downturn.
-The better would be my $23.50/hr plan.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
Psst.....asshole....you don't have a "plan". You're not a world leader and you're not a candidate for President of the United States. You're an asshole sitting in your parents basement working a minimum wage job (hence your desire for $23 per hour minimum wage) desperately trying to make yourself sound important. Hint: you're not.My plan would....collapse the world economy
My plan would....collapse the world economy
My plan would....collapse the world economy
My plan would....collapse the world economy
My plan would....collapse the world economy
My plan would....collapse the world economy
You really want to "end all welfare"? I've got an exponentially better "plan" than you do for that junior.My plan would end all welfare.
Out of all that, you snap back to hate of illegals? YOUR party invites them in with longtime refusal of a good SS ID card and only gives a shytte during one of THEIR corrupt recessions/depressions, and know they can distract the chumps like you with bs about useless, un-American Berlin walls and unconstitutional harassment laws. Brainwashed functional morons..."PROFITABLE". Also before and AFTER that period. Propagandists don't have facts, dupe. Like all you morons saying we have the highest corporate taxes in the world. LOL. Only on small business...Thanks GOPhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3beU1YLOAhXEcT4KHbclDisQFgg1MAM&url=http://www.americansfortaxfairness.org/tax-fairness-briefing-booklet/fact-sheet-corporate-tax-rates/&usg=AFQjCNFQUNPRYUMm7ONb-tuD3xCJb__yYA&sig2=UzkhaAAC69GcI7wbRs6JpQshifted their main corporations overseas where they pay ZERO US Taxes but collect oodles in sales in the US.
Challenge: Cite three examples of these corporations who pay zero US tax but collect sales in the US?
- Corporate share of federal tax revenue has dropped by two-thirds in 60 years — from 32% in 1952 to 10% in 2013.
- General Electric, Boeing, Verizon and 23 other profitable Fortune 500 firms paid no federal income taxes from 2008 to 2012.
- 288 big and profitable Fortune 500 corporations paid an average effective federal tax rate of just 19.4% from 2008 to 2012.
- Profitable corporations paid U.S. income taxes amounting to just 12.6% of worldwide incomein 2010.
- U.S. corporations dodge $90 billion a year in income taxes by shifting profits to subsidiaries — often no more than post office boxes — in tax havens.
- U.S. corporations officially hold $2.1 trillion in profits offshore — much of it in tax havens — that have not yet been taxed here.
Okay moron... read your challenge CAREFULLY.... I asked you to show 3 corporations who 1) Paid zero US taxes AND 2) Collected sales in the US. You cited a list of propaganda links which show such nuggets as "General Electric, Boeing, Verizon and 23 other profitable Fortune 500 firms paid no federal income taxes from 2008 to 2012" BUT... what the propagandists FAIL to mention is their sales. You see, whenever your expenses are more than your profits, you show a loss and you don't pay taxes on a loss. Now, just so happens, between '08-'12, we went through a major recession and many businesses who didn't completely tank, didn't show a profit.
But propagandists rely on really stupid people who don't comprehend that "revenues collected" is not profits made. And so, you can manipulate statistics to show something seemingly outrageous or unethical. The only person being unethical is you... the propagandist.
The only dupe is the one that supports rewarding criminal activity of illegals. I don't. That makes you the dupe and accessory to a crime.
Any actual argument, Pubtroll? (the only kind)...You really want to "end all welfare"? I've got an exponentially better "plan" than you do for that junior.My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would eliminate welfare since it is 100% unconstitutional at the federal level anyway. Then I would leave businesses the fuck alone because the federal government has no business meddling in the free market. Then I would create a 10% Flat Tax for corporations and a consumption tax for individuals (no income tax at all on the individual since that stupidity allows for criminals such as the mafia, drug cartels, prostitutes, etc. to avoid paying tax - while a consumption tax will ensure that every single person in America - including illegal aliens - pays taxes). The government will have higher revenues than it has ever had while each American will have more money in their pocket than they've ever had.
You're "plan" (LMAO!!!) would create over 78% unemployment on the first day. My plan would lower unemployment to unprecedented levels while ensuring Constitutional government and maximum liberty.
You're "plan" shows you're an immature asshole living in his parents basement making minimum wage.
Out of all that, you snap back to hate of illegals? YOUR party invites them in with longtime refusal of a good SS ID card and only gives a shytte during one of THEIR corrupt recessions/depressions, and know they can distract the chumps like you with bs about useless, un-American Berlin walls and unconstitutional harassment laws. Brainwashed functional morons..."PROFITABLE". Also before and AFTER that period. Propagandists don't have facts, dupe. Like all you morons saying we have the highest corporate taxes in the world. LOL. Only on small business...Thanks GOPhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3beU1YLOAhXEcT4KHbclDisQFgg1MAM&url=http://www.americansfortaxfairness.org/tax-fairness-briefing-booklet/fact-sheet-corporate-tax-rates/&usg=AFQjCNFQUNPRYUMm7ONb-tuD3xCJb__yYA&sig2=UzkhaAAC69GcI7wbRs6JpQChallenge: Cite three examples of these corporations who pay zero US tax but collect sales in the US?
- Corporate share of federal tax revenue has dropped by two-thirds in 60 years — from 32% in 1952 to 10% in 2013.
- General Electric, Boeing, Verizon and 23 other profitable Fortune 500 firms paid no federal income taxes from 2008 to 2012.
- 288 big and profitable Fortune 500 corporations paid an average effective federal tax rate of just 19.4% from 2008 to 2012.
- Profitable corporations paid U.S. income taxes amounting to just 12.6% of worldwide incomein 2010.
- U.S. corporations dodge $90 billion a year in income taxes by shifting profits to subsidiaries — often no more than post office boxes — in tax havens.
- U.S. corporations officially hold $2.1 trillion in profits offshore — much of it in tax havens — that have not yet been taxed here.
Okay moron... read your challenge CAREFULLY.... I asked you to show 3 corporations who 1) Paid zero US taxes AND 2) Collected sales in the US. You cited a list of propaganda links which show such nuggets as "General Electric, Boeing, Verizon and 23 other profitable Fortune 500 firms paid no federal income taxes from 2008 to 2012" BUT... what the propagandists FAIL to mention is their sales. You see, whenever your expenses are more than your profits, you show a loss and you don't pay taxes on a loss. Now, just so happens, between '08-'12, we went through a major recession and many businesses who didn't completely tank, didn't show a profit.
But propagandists rely on really stupid people who don't comprehend that "revenues collected" is not profits made. And so, you can manipulate statistics to show something seemingly outrageous or unethical. The only person being unethical is you... the propagandist.
The only dupe is the one that supports rewarding criminal activity of illegals. I don't. That makes you the dupe and accessory to a crime.
Yeah...the one that just obliterated your dumb-ass to the point that you can't even attempt to dispute it, much less actually dispute it!Any actual argument, Pubtroll? (the only kind)...You really want to "end all welfare"? I've got an exponentially better "plan" than you do for that junior.My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would eliminate welfare since it is 100% unconstitutional at the federal level anyway. Then I would leave businesses the fuck alone because the federal government has no business meddling in the free market. Then I would create a 10% Flat Tax for corporations and a consumption tax for individuals (no income tax at all on the individual since that stupidity allows for criminals such as the mafia, drug cartels, prostitutes, etc. to avoid paying tax - while a consumption tax will ensure that every single person in America - including illegal aliens - pays taxes). The government will have higher revenues than it has ever had while each American will have more money in their pocket than they've ever had.
You're "plan" (LMAO!!!) would create over 78% unemployment on the first day. My plan would lower unemployment to unprecedented levels while ensuring Constitutional government and maximum liberty.
You're "plan" shows you're an immature asshole living in his parents basement making minimum wage.
Ya know. I keep hearing from fake conservatives about how we spend too much on welfare. Welfare would cause taxes to raise. Poor people want to steal more of my money. Blah, blah, blah.
Some interesting statistics:
Finland spends 3.2% of its federal budget on public assistance.
Great Britain spends a little over 4.6%
Israel spends 2.4%
Norway spends a whopping 6.2%.
And the US? 0.7%. That's it.
So, why can't we just increase that to 2%? We can take that 2% away from our bloated military budget. It would still make us the Western nation that spends the least amount of money on their poor, but imagine the massive effect that would have on poverty in this country. And it wouldn't even cost the tax payers one. Red. Cent. more than they are paying, now. Because I'm not suggesting increasing the budget. I'm suggesting giving public assistance a slightly larger piece of the existing budget.
Why is that such an outrageous idea?
We already have a flat tax- everyone pays 20-30% in ALL taxes and fees, and it kills the nonrich. A flat tax always will. dupe.Yeah...the one that just obliterated your dumb-ass to the point that you can't even attempt to dispute it, much less actually dispute it!Any actual argument, Pubtroll? (the only kind)...You really want to "end all welfare"? I've got an exponentially better "plan" than you do for that junior.My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would eliminate welfare since it is 100% unconstitutional at the federal level anyway. Then I would leave businesses the fuck alone because the federal government has no business meddling in the free market. Then I would create a 10% Flat Tax for corporations and a consumption tax for individuals (no income tax at all on the individual since that stupidity allows for criminals such as the mafia, drug cartels, prostitutes, etc. to avoid paying tax - while a consumption tax will ensure that every single person in America - including illegal aliens - pays taxes). The government will have higher revenues than it has ever had while each American will have more money in their pocket than they've ever had.
You're "plan" (LMAO!!!) would create over 78% unemployment on the first day. My plan would lower unemployment to unprecedented levels while ensuring Constitutional government and maximum liberty.
You're "plan" shows you're an immature asshole living in his parents basement making minimum wage.
Art. I, Sec 8, Cl. 1= to spend for the common defense and general welfareYa know. I keep hearing from fake conservatives about how we spend too much on welfare. Welfare would cause taxes to raise. Poor people want to steal more of my money. Blah, blah, blah.
Some interesting statistics:
Finland spends 3.2% of its federal budget on public assistance.
Great Britain spends a little over 4.6%
Israel spends 2.4%
Norway spends a whopping 6.2%.
And the US? 0.7%. That's it.
So, why can't we just increase that to 2%? We can take that 2% away from our bloated military budget. It would still make us the Western nation that spends the least amount of money on their poor, but imagine the massive effect that would have on poverty in this country. And it wouldn't even cost the tax payers one. Red. Cent. more than they are paying, now. Because I'm not suggesting increasing the budget. I'm suggesting giving public assistance a slightly larger piece of the existing budget.
Why is that such an outrageous idea?
You want an answer? I'll give you an answer - though you'll never understand or accept it.....
The US Constitution make NO PROVISIONS for the expenditure of Federal funds on ANY form of welfare. Not for social or personal welfare.
Therefore the 0.7% the United States spends on these things is 0.7% too much.
