Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do Conservatives hate organized labor? Is it because the Conservatives don't want labor protected? Is it because Conservatives see labor as a commodity? One that should respond to market forces like supply and demand?
Why do conservatives hate civil liberties? Is it because the Conservatives see civil liberties as a hindrance to commerce (I believe commerce is all that really matters to a Conservative)? Is it because Conservatives feel too much freedom is a dangerous thing?
Why do Conservatives hate economically disadvantaged people? They seem to get worked up about unemployment benefits. They seem to have utter contempt for the poor.
Why do Conservatives hate environmentalism? Can it be that Conservatism demands pollution? Again, I believe that as commerce is the single most important thing to Conservatives. Anything that may hinder commerce from doing whatever the hell it wants has to be bad by default.
I know I'm going to take heat for a thread that picks at so many scabs, but these are the issues which seem to divide this country most politically. If some Conservatives want to answer these and other questions honestly, I'd appreciate it.
What a bunch of bogus straw man questions. They don't deserve the dignity of a response - they are just "when did you stop beating your wife" accusations.
I don't think they're strawmen, I mean this one - Why do Conservatives hate organized labor? Is it because the Conservatives don't want labor protected? Is it because Conservatives see labor as a commodity? One that should respond to market forces like supply and demand? - is a good question. However it's a closed question which limits its usefulness, I'll concede that. But conservatives and reactionaries do hate organised labour and they want it dismantled and they want to see workers exposed to the twin laws of supply and demand because they believe that's how things should be.
Why do Conservatives hate organized labor? Is it because the Conservatives don't want labor protected? Is it because Conservatives see labor as a commodity? One that should respond to market forces like supply and demand?
Why do conservatives hate civil liberties? Is it because the Conservatives see civil liberties as a hindrance to commerce (I believe commerce is all that really matters to a Conservative)? Is it because Conservatives feel too much freedom is a dangerous thing?
Why do Conservatives hate economically disadvantaged people? They seem to get worked up about unemployment benefits. They seem to have utter contempt for the poor.
Why do Conservatives hate environmentalism? Can it be that Conservatism demands pollution? Again, I believe that as commerce is the single most important thing to Conservatives. Anything that may hinder commerce from doing whatever the hell it wants has to be bad by default.
I know I'm going to take heat for a thread that picks at so many scabs, but these are the issues which seem to divide this country most politically. If some Conservatives want to answer these and other questions honestly, I'd appreciate it.
What Scabs do you pick? The only ONES are in the minds of YOUR likes, and those of your compadres that SEEK rather actively to pit ONE American against another by dividing them into groups...and compartmentalising them for your further sick twisted 'FUN'.
As to this 'Groupthink' Mentality of YOU and your sick-twisted Statists/Progressive brothers/Sisters?
We Conservatives are onto you...WE aren't buying this PERVERSION what YOU have been selling over the decades. And it appears that the PEOPLE are much like us...in FACT they *ARE* US.
You are welcome to plod on...but no one is stepping on the flaming bag of unadultrated HORSESHIT that you present.
I am stepping AROUND it as to present it to your olefactory delight. it STINKS as does YOUR THREAD HERE.
My advice to you is to wake the Hell up. *YOU* are outnumbered by those that YOU make fun of.
What a bunch of bogus straw man questions. They don't deserve the dignity of a response - they are just "when did you stop beating your wife" accusations.
I don't think they're strawmen, I mean this one - Why do Conservatives hate organized labor? Is it because the Conservatives don't want labor protected? Is it because Conservatives see labor as a commodity? One that should respond to market forces like supply and demand? - is a good question. However it's a closed question which limits its usefulness, I'll concede that. But conservatives and reactionaries do hate organised labour and they want it dismantled and they want to see workers exposed to the twin laws of supply and demand because they believe that's how things should be.
Cons have no right to oppose organized labor. It's a function of capitalism. Workers have the right to organize to prevent being exploited and abused by their bosses. Sure, they usually support Dems due to their reciprocal support of Labor, but they are not government instruments.
I don't think they're strawmen, I mean this one - Why do Conservatives hate organized labor? Is it because the Conservatives don't want labor protected? Is it because Conservatives see labor as a commodity? One that should respond to market forces like supply and demand? - is a good question. However it's a closed question which limits its usefulness, I'll concede that. But conservatives and reactionaries do hate organised labour and they want it dismantled and they want to see workers exposed to the twin laws of supply and demand because they believe that's how things should be.
Cons have no right to oppose organized labor. It's a function of capitalism. Workers have the right to organize to prevent being exploited and abused by their bosses. Sure, they usually support Dems due to their reciprocal support of Labor, but they are not government instruments.
Actually, they do have the right to oppose. It's a function of freedom just as the right to organize is a function of freedom. In fact, it's the SAME function of freedom.
Cons have no right to oppose organized labor. It's a function of capitalism. Workers have the right to organize to prevent being exploited and abused by their bosses. Sure, they usually support Dems due to their reciprocal support of Labor, but they are not government instruments.
Actually, they do have the right to oppose. It's a function of freedom just as the right to organize is a function of freedom. In fact, it's the SAME function of freedom.
You're right, I almost went back and edited that. I should've said no justification. In this country, you have the right to oppose anything you want.
Thanks for that brilliant contribution and insightWhy Conservatives hate...
... really stupid thread titles? I can't imagine why anyone would get tired of THAT.![]()
Why do Conservatives hate organized labor?
Is it because the Conservatives don't want labor protected?
Is it because Conservatives see labor as a commodity?
One that should respond to market forces like supply and demand?
Why do conservatives hate civil liberties?
Is it because the Conservatives see civil liberties as a hindrance to commerce (I believe commerce is all that really matters to a Conservative)?
Is it because Conservatives feel too much freedom is a dangerous thing?
Why do Conservatives hate economically disadvantaged people?
They seem to get worked up about unemployment benefits. They seem to have utter contempt for the poor.
Why do Conservatives hate environmentalism?
Can it be that Conservatism demands pollution?
Again, I believe that as commerce is the single most important thing to Conservatives. Anything that may hinder commerce from doing whatever the hell it wants has to be bad by default.
Why do Conservatives hate organized labor?
Because they make it more difficult for business to do business and by in large isn't neccessary.
☭proletarian☭;2062737 said:Why do Conservatives hate organized labor?
Because they make it more difficult for business to do business and by in large isn't neccessary.
No? Do you realize how things were before the unions existed?
☭proletarian☭;2062737 said:Because they make it more difficult for business to do business and by in large isn't neccessary.
No? Do you realize how things were before the unions existed?
Before my time. But I know how it is now with businesses that don't have them. For people with valuable skill sets, unions are a non issue.
☭proletarian☭;2062737 said:Why do Conservatives hate organized labor?
Because they make it more difficult for business to do business and by in large isn't neccessary.
No? Do you realize how things were before the unions existed?
☭proletarian☭;2062737 said:Because they make it more difficult for business to do business and by in large isn't neccessary.
No? Do you realize how things were before the unions existed?
Do you realize how things were before the internal combustion engine? But despite all the good that has been accomplished, should we not require a reasonable standard of safety in their use? And take the unsafe apparatus off the road or out of the system?
Do you realize how things were before electricity was harnessed? But shall we do away with the U.L. certification or not warn people in the proper and safe use of electrical apparatus? Shall we leave unsafe wiring in place or demand that it be replaced or fixed?
Do you realize how things were before the American Revolution? But do you now think that everything every politician has done and all government policy and intiatives are wonderful or even honest and ethical? Because so much good has been done do we then just ignore the bad, the corrupt, the damaging, the dishonest, the unethical?
Do you honestly think that because unions have done some good in the past and/or the present that all unions now have the health and welfare of business in mind and/or they are noble institutions? That they operate honestly and ethically? That there is no downside? That there should be no interest in the harm that they do or can do?
☭proletarian☭;2062737 said:No? Do you realize how things were before the unions existed?
Do you realize how things were before the internal combustion engine? But despite all the good that has been accomplished, should we not require a reasonable standard of safety in their use? And take the unsafe apparatus off the road or out of the system?
Do you realize how things were before electricity was harnessed? But shall we do away with the U.L. certification or not warn people in the proper and safe use of electrical apparatus? Shall we leave unsafe wiring in place or demand that it be replaced or fixed?
Do you realize how things were before the American Revolution? But do you now think that everything every politician has done and all government policy and intiatives are wonderful or even honest and ethical? Because so much good has been done do we then just ignore the bad, the corrupt, the damaging, the dishonest, the unethical?
Do you honestly think that because unions have done some good in the past and/or the present that all unions now have the health and welfare of business in mind and/or they are noble institutions? That they operate honestly and ethically? That there is no downside? That there should be no interest in the harm that they do or can do?
Do I think unions are perfect? Of course not. But it's not their job to fight for the health and welfare of the business - it's their job to fight for the health and welfare of the workers. Businesses can fight for their own welfare.
Union involvement in politics is a counter-balance to business involvement in politics. If money = speech for corporations (like the SOTUS just ruled), why shouldn't it be the same for unions?
Do you realize how things were before the internal combustion engine? But despite all the good that has been accomplished, should we not require a reasonable standard of safety in their use? And take the unsafe apparatus off the road or out of the system?
Do you realize how things were before electricity was harnessed? But shall we do away with the U.L. certification or not warn people in the proper and safe use of electrical apparatus? Shall we leave unsafe wiring in place or demand that it be replaced or fixed?
Do you realize how things were before the American Revolution? But do you now think that everything every politician has done and all government policy and intiatives are wonderful or even honest and ethical? Because so much good has been done do we then just ignore the bad, the corrupt, the damaging, the dishonest, the unethical?
Do you honestly think that because unions have done some good in the past and/or the present that all unions now have the health and welfare of business in mind and/or they are noble institutions? That they operate honestly and ethically? That there is no downside? That there should be no interest in the harm that they do or can do?
Do I think unions are perfect? Of course not. But it's not their job to fight for the health and welfare of the business - it's their job to fight for the health and welfare of the workers. Businesses can fight for their own welfare.
Union involvement in politics is a counter-balance to business involvement in politics. If money = speech for corporations (like the SOTUS just ruled), why shouldn't it be the same for unions?
The right to free speech requires no contribution from anybody else. It only requires their noninterference. I have no problem with unions lobbying for legislation that they want to see happen. I have a huge problem with unions getting deals or contracts or anything else from the government that nonunion people are not allowed to get.
The union corruption of which I speak requires HUGE contributions from others; and, when unions are afforded special privileges, dispensations, and payola from the public treasury, that requires what I believe to be an unconstitutional contribution from me.
When the government gives unions a free pass on the ramifications of a massive universal healthcare bill, that can affect the taxes that I pay and/or the cost of healthcare products that I will be required to purchase. And that, I believe, also requires an unconstitutional contribution from me and you and everybody else, and is just plain wrong.