Why Did the Biden’s Create Over 20 Shell Companies?

[Faun]

He was being let off on two misdemeanors and immunity to any other charges, Faun when he committed numerous felonies! That would have literally been the end of the DOJ investigation if not for a brave Federal Judge. That's what happens when you let someone as corrupt as Merrick Garland run the DOJ.

Dumbfuck, there was no immunity to any other charges. That's why Hunter reneged on the deal he got.

 

[Oldestyle]

Dumbfuck, there was no immunity to any other charges. That's why Hunter reneged on the deal he got.

You're the dumbfuck, Faun! The REASON that Hunter's team backed out of the plea deal was because the prosecutors reneged on the immunity to other charges part of the deal! That was the only thing Hunter really wanted...to not have to be worried about being brought up on charges of being an unregistered foreign agent as well as more tax evasion charges and influence peddling charges! They thought they were going to be allowed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges...which carry no jail time...and get immunity from everything else. The judge looked at that and started asking the prosecution questions. As soon as she did the prosecutor tucked tail and ran for the hills! It was so obvious that the plea deal was unprecedented that they didn't have the stones to even attempt to argue for it!

 

[nomadic5]

What I don't u/stand is why this investigation into shell companies and etc is not further along.

They keep telling us they need more info...

I don't get it why it is so hard to figure out that these "companies" were .. shells. I mean, you look at Joe's Diner down the street. If you asked the operator of that joint to see his business license, he would present it to you, and you could look at the diner and see what his business is all about. So why does no one in Congress seem to actually do this kind of practical (or whatever) investigation?

I mean, it just doesn't seem like brain surgery or rocket science to prove WHAT a business does, HOW it does it and etc...

 

[Nostra]

Dumbfuck, there was no immunity to any other charges. That's why Hunter reneged on the deal he got.

The DOJ and Crackhead’s lawyers made that deal and tried to slip it by the judge, Simp.

The Judge called bullshit.

 

[Oldestyle]

The DOJ and Crackhead’s lawyers made that deal and tried to slip it by the judge, Simp.

The Judge called bullshit.

You know that plea deal was outrageous because they won't release it. The Biden DOJ investigating the Biden's borders on farce! Has there EVER been a situation that cried out for a Special Counsel more than this one?

 

[Faun]

You're the dumbfuck, Faun! The REASON that Hunter's team backed out of the plea deal was because the prosecutors reneged on the immunity to other charges part of the deal! That was the only thing Hunter really wanted...to not have to be worried about being brought up on charges of being an unregistered foreign agent as well as more tax evasion charges and influence peddling charges! They thought they were going to be allowed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges...which carry no jail time...and get immunity from everything else. The judge looked at that and started asking the prosecution questions. As soon as she did the prosecutor tucked tail and ran for the hills! It was so obvious that the plea deal was unprecedented that they didn't have the stones to even attempt to argue for it!

Nope, you are the dumbfuck. Prosecutors couldn't have reneged on giving him blanket immunity for all other potential charges because they never gave that to him in the first place.

Here's the plea agreement... that's not in there...

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

But read exhibit A and tell me again how Hunter was never investigated.

 

[Faun]

The DOJ and Crackhead’s lawyers made that deal and tried to slip it by the judge, Simp.

The Judge called bullshit.

And here comes the forum's biggest dumbfuck to eat his own foot again. No, Dumbfuck, there was no deal to give Hunter a pass on all other potential crimes.

And even had there been, the plea agreement was crystal clear that the judge was not bound by the agreement.

 

[Oldestyle]

Nope, you are the dumbfuck. Prosecutors couldn't have reneged on giving him blanket immunity for all other potential charges because they never gave that to him in the first place.

Here's the plea agreement... that's not in there...

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

But read exhibit A and tell me again how Hunter was never investigated.

Did you read that? You have no idea what the prosecutors were prepared to give him because "Attachment A" was filed under seal!

 

[Oldestyle]

And here comes the forum's biggest dumbfuck to eat his own foot again. No, Dumbfuck, there was no deal to give Hunter a pass on all other potential crimes.

And even had there been, the plea agreement was crystal clear that the judge was not bound by the agreement.

Again...since you have no idea what was in the "sealed" part of the plea agreement you have no way of knowing what the prosecutor was promising to give Hunter! A logical person can surmise however that it was something substantial and it dealt with excusing Hunter from future prosecutions. One would know that because of Hunter's defense team immediately declared that Hunter wouldn't agree to the plea deal and would be entering a not guilty plea instead as soon as the judge questioned how the plea deal would deal with ongoing investigations!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Did you read that? You have no idea what the prosecutors were prepared to give him because "Attachment A" was filed under seal!

The simp is desperate

 

[Faun]

Did you read that? You have no idea what the prosecutors were prepared to give him because "Attachment A" was filed under seal!

Of course I have an idea. I just love it when dumbfucks double and triple down on their dumbfuckery.

Hunter's own attorneys admitted they thought the plea agreement protected their client more than it actually did.

Attachment A

And by the way, in court it was revealed Hunter is under investigation for other possible crimes. You know, an investigation, like the one you idiotically denied.

The reason those IRS whistleblowers came forward to testify in front of the House Committee is that they know that the Garland DOJ HASN'T investigated the Biden family!

​

 

[Faun]

Again...since you have no idea what was in the "sealed" part of the plea agreement you have no way of knowing what the prosecutor was promising to give Hunter! A logical person can surmise however that it was something substantial and it dealt with excusing Hunter from future prosecutions. One would know that because of Hunter's defense team immediately declared that Hunter wouldn't agree to the plea deal and would be entering a not guilty plea instead as soon as the judge questioned how the plea deal would deal with ongoing investigations!

LOLOL

No, a logical person would read the statement of facts to see what was actually in it.

 

[candycorn]

I’ll let the impeachment trial tell you.

So when do you think Biden will be kicked out of office?

 

[Oldestyle]

LOLOL

No, a logical person would read the statement of facts to see what was actually in it.

"AgreementNottoProsecute 16. The United States agrees not to criminally prosecute Biden, outside of the terms of this Agreement, for any federal crimes encompassed by the attached Statement ofFacts (AttachmentA) and the Statement of Facts attached as Exhibit 1 to the MemorandumofPloaAgreement filed this same day. This Agreement does not provide anyprotectionagainst prosecution for any future conduct by Biden or by any of hisaffiliatedbusinesses."

THAT my friend was what the judge found surprising, Faun! She questioned the prosecutors as to why an agreement to not prosecute Hunter for any federal crimes was warranted when he was still being investigated for crimes! The fact that the Merrick Garland DOJ tried to slide that past the judge by sticking it in the gun part of the charge is disgusting.

 

[Faun]

"AgreementNottoProsecute 16. The United States agrees not to criminally prosecute Biden, outside of the terms of this Agreement, for any federal crimes encompassed by the attached Statement ofFacts (AttachmentA) and the Statement of Facts attached as Exhibit 1 to the MemorandumofPloaAgreement filed this same day. This Agreement does not provide anyprotectionagainst prosecution for any future conduct by Biden or by any of hisaffiliatedbusinesses."

THAT my friend was what the judge found surprising, Faun! She questioned the prosecutors as to why an agreement to not prosecute Hunter for any federal crimes was warranted when he was still being investigated for crimes! The fact that the Merrick Garland DOJ tried to slide that past the judge by sticking it in the gun part of the charge is disgusting.

What part of, "for any federal crimes encompassed by the attached Statement of Facts," don't you understand?

The deal was they would not go after crimes in the statement of facts. You know, the document you earlier argued we don't know what's in it. But Hunter's lawyers thought that would include things even if they were just in the periphery of items mentioned in the statement of facts.

Savvy?

Hunters's lawyers screwed up. Prosecutors did not reneg on the deal. They couldn't have unless they backed out of it as everything was in writing. Hunter reneged.

 

[Oldestyle]

What part of, "for any federal crimes encompassed by the attached Statement of Facts," don't you understand?

The deal was they would not go after crimes in the statement of facts. You know, the document you earlier argued we don't know what's in it. But Hunter's lawyers thought that would include things even if they were just in the periphery of items mentioned in the statement of facts.

Savvy?

Hunters's lawyers screwed up. Prosecutors did not reneg on the deal. They couldn't have unless they backed out of it as everything was in writing. Hunter reneged.

Oh bullshit! Hunter's lawyers and the DOJ prosecutors colluded to put together a plea deal that would have Hunter plead guilty to two lesser charges that carried no jail time...get diversion for the gun felony...and then have immunity to any crimes he committed up to that point and they tried to hide that immunity in the diversion part of the plea deal and slip it past the judge. She saw what they were doing and called the prosecution on it and they panicked. The judge asked if Hunter was presently being investigated for other crimes and the prosecutor reluctantly answered yes at which point the judge asked incredulously why a plea deal would include immunity for crimes that were currently being investigated and if the prosecutors had ever seen something like that done before. The prosecutor sheepishly admitted that he had not and that was the end of that sweet heart plea deal. As soon as that blanket immunity was taken away, Hunter's lawyers refused the deal and he pled not guilty.

What this debacle shows quite clearly is that the Biden DOJ is completely corrupt and that a Special Counsel should have been named to investigate this two YEARS ago!

 

[Lisa558]

You're the dumbfuck, Faun! The REASON that Hunter's team backed out of the plea deal was because the prosecutors reneged on the immunity to other charges part of the deal! That was the only thing Hunter really wanted...to not have to be worried about being brought up on charges of being an unregistered foreign agent as well as more tax evasion charges and influence peddling charges! They thought they were going to be allowed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges...which carry no jail time...and get immunity from everything else. The judge looked at that and started asking the prosecution questions. As soon as she did the prosecutor tucked tail and ran for the hills! It was so obvious that the plea deal was unprecedented that they didn't have the stones to even attempt to argue for it!

Yup. This the analogy to what the Garland DOJ attempted:

An employee appears to have embezzled $10 million from his company now sitting in 20 suspicious banks accounts, which the company is presently investigating, while also parking too close to a hydrant one day. The deal is: if you plead guilty to the parking infraction, we’ll give you immunity over the embezzlement charges.

 

[Oldestyle]

Yup. This the analogy to what the Garland DOJ attempted:

An employee appears to have embezzled $10 million from his company now sitting in 20 suspicious banks accounts, which the company is presently investigating, while also parking too close to a hydrant one day. The deal is: if you plead guilty to the parking infraction, we’ll give you immunity over the embezzlement charges.

Can you believe the stones on Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and the prosecutors in this case? They knew that eventually what Hunter and Joe have done is going to be exposed and they colluded with the Hunter Biden defense team to give him essentially a "get out of jail free" card...that would let them tell the American people that the case was resolved and it was time to move on! Garland is the sleaziest AG this country has ever had. Thank god he didn't become a Supreme Court Justice!

 

[schmidlap]

What was their purpose?
What service was provided in return for the money?
Me thinks Deep State is tired of Joe.

The Biden family opened more than 20 shell companies to hide payments and launder money, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) said Sunday.
After reviewing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) at the Treasury and subpoenaing banks and individuals, Comer posted on Twitter that the Biden family created more than 20 entities to accept, forward, and collect payment from a wide range of business associates.

"We found all these shell companies that make absolutely no sense," Comer told Fox News. "I don't believe they have paid a penny of revenue, a penny of taxes on most of the millions of dollars they received from our adversaries around the world."

...

"How did they list this on their taxes?" Comer questioned. "Is it a service they provided?"

So, hyper-partisan hype aside, what illegalities, if any, is Comer alleging, and what legal actions is he initiating?

"We believe that there was a return on the investment," Comer said, without citing evidence...​

​

He provided no specific examples of Joe Biden’s policies or decisions the committee believed were influenced by his family’s business practices.​

​

... Oversight Committee members repeatedly suggested that the existence of numerous Biden family-linked accounts and limited liability companies signaled wrongdoing.​

​

The memo, however, did not provide evidence that Hunter Biden or other Biden family members violated the law...​

​

Experts have told PolitiFact that it’s not uncommon for Chinese businesses with links to the Chinese government, for example, to court prominent Americans or their family members. ​

"This has been a pattern for a long time," Comer said. "Republicans and Democrats have both complained about presidents’ families receiving money."​

​

PolitiFact - House Republicans’ findings about the Biden family’s foreign business practices, explained​

 

[Oldestyle]

Can you picture the HOWLS of indignation from the Main Stream Media if Donald Trump had ever pulled a stunt like this to cover up a crime committed by a member of his family? The White House press room would been a full on riot every day! Can you imagine a Trump Press Secretary telling that press corps that it was "private matter" and they wouldn't be addressing it? OMG...they'd have things thrown at them!