Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why did the Supreme Court take the very unusual action of initiating a draft vote on such a divisive issue before a major election? The law has been on the books for decades, there was no urgency. I suspect Chief Justice Roberts pushed the issue forward. He was the one who jammed Obamacare down our throats. Remember?
It had to be rendered before the term ended in SeptWhy did the Supreme Court take the very unusual action of initiating a draft vote on such a divisive issue before a major election? The law has been on the books for decades, there was no urgency. I suspect Chief Justice Roberts pushed the issue forward. He was the one who jammed Obamacare down our throats. Remember?
You are a failure of policy andof a man. I don't wish you were abortedBecause they're right wing religious zealots.
They can't help themselves.
And as always happens, they bite off more than they can chew, and America gets tired of their shit.
This current crop of misfits on the court represent 30% of the country at most, and it's probably less than that.
It will last about as long as Reagans drug war. How did that work out again?
Why did the Supreme Court take the very unusual action of initiating a draft vote on such a divisive issue before a major election? The law has been on the books for decades, there was no urgency. I suspect Chief Justice Roberts pushed the issue forward. He was the one who jammed Obamacare down our throats. Remember?
Thanks. This has been bugging me, it just doesn't add up.Really good point and thought there. It doesnt make much sense unless someone was looking to sabotage the Republicans upcoming election
Drafts are drafts and are changed and finally decided. It had to come out by the end of the termThat’s a very good question.
Hey Sister. 9 is enough as they all free on the courtLooks like adding more justices will be the only option. What exists is a political nightmare and it shows badly.
Thank you for injecting a note of reasonIt had to be rendered before the term ended in Sept
They have 20 case a yr I believe
This is a great outcome. I love that leaker. He should be executed for treason. But I love him or her so
I'm not following why it had to be rendered this year.It had to be rendered before the term ended in Sept
They have 20 case a yr I believe
This is a great outcome. I love that leaker. He should be executed for treason. But I love him or her so
Looks like adding more justices will be the only option. What exists is a political nightmare and it shows badly.
Why did the Supreme Court take the very unusual action of initiating a draft vote on such a divisive issue before a major election? The law has been on the books for decades, there was no urgency. I suspect Chief Justice Roberts pushed the issue forward. He was the one who jammed Obamacare down our throats. Remember?
Neither of you are making any sense! Try again! What the hell are you talking about?Really good point and thought there. It doesnt make much sense unless someone was looking to sabotage the Republicans upcoming election
What doesn't add up? The SCOTUS heard arguments, rendered a decision, and Alito wrote the draft of the ruling. There is nothing unusual at all!Thanks. This has been bugging me, it just doesn't add up.
That's because you do not understand that the court hears arguments of cases and renders a decision before adjourning for the summer. You have to also remember, Breyer is gone after this term and Jackson starts afresh in October. He heard the case, and she did not!I'm not following why it had to be rendered this year.
Neither of you are making any sense! Try again! What the hell are you talking about?
Sloopy has a Mangina. Hah ha ha! He backs up to any guy and he's not confused.Hey Sister. 9 is enough as they all free on the court
Can't get your way you little pink dressed Pippi Longstocking
You are such a GD disgrace even to the gender confused, Sister
