Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Attacking him with ad hom is not refutation of his statements.
LOL
Yo stupid, the refutation is independent of the ad hom. Refute, THEN call the fucking moron a fucking moron....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Attacking him with ad hom is not refutation of his statements.
LOL
There's the nub of it. You think there is an eminant threat inherent against the USA comming from Islam.
Whereas normal people think there is a threat from the Radical Islamics to pull off another 9-11 but since they don't have the capacity to stop the unknown they are not going to let fear rule their lives.
There's the nub of it. You think there is an eminant threat inherent against the USA comming from Islam.
It would be pretty vacuous to be ignorant of the threat posed by Islam.
Whereas normal people think there is a threat from the Radical Islamics to pull off another 9-11 but since they don't have the capacity to stop the unknown they are not going to let fear rule their lives.
Yeah, that explains taking shoes off at airports...
Be serious.
9/11 type attacks are the minority - though the Madrid train bombings demonstrate that they aren't a one time event, either. You talk about fear, the capitulation by Spain after a major terror attack shows real fear. More than fear, cowardice.
Outside of 9/11 size attacks though, we have FT. Hood. The Manhattan Car bomber, Shoe Bomber, Underwear Bomber, ad nasium.
Yes, most of these have been thwarted - which is the point. Most of these have been stopped not by idiot TSA agents jacking off to nude scans, but by the diligence of average people aware that there IS a real threat and that it can't be ignored.
What you claim as "normal people" are fools, the morons who hang out at Huffingglue Post and KOS. Thank GOD that real people DON'T ignore the threat from Islam and HAVE been observant enough to thwart the Underwear, Shoe and car bomber. Thank God they DO question the Muslim groups in Detroit and elsewhere who have plotted dozens and dozens of terror attacks - stopped because people DO understand the threat that Islam poses.
Bodecea and her lover(if she actually has one) would be beheaded if they lived in a Muslim country.. It's A HUGE no-no to be a lesbian in that culture... yet she supports it. LOL I told you she's stoopid.
[
But the odd thing is, I am gay and I most certainly do not think or talk about gay sex as much as YOU do.
While it is true that radical muslims are a definite threat to America's safety, we must not overlook the reason why they hate us so. They are enraged at the fact we Americans are the financiers and main support of the horrors and atrocities the state of Israel has inflicted on them since Palestine was stolen through terrorism, warfare and political chicanery in 1948.
Thank you for providing an example of the trivialization of the threat of Islam (Lasher).
Bodecea and her lover(if she actually has one) would be beheaded if they lived in a Muslim country.. It's A HUGE no-no to be a lesbian in that culture... yet she supports it. LOL I told you she's stoopid.
That IS a bit of a conundrum for her....
[
But the odd thing is, I am gay and I most certainly do not think or talk about gay sex as much as YOU do.
So then, your thesis that talking about gay sex makes one gay is demonstrably false.
You're not real good at this, you know?
I have to say...I've argued over many years with many people and have finally come to the conclusion that while there is a form for debate, if someone isn't willing or able to follow the form, we set an example.
So anymore, though I will kibbitz over certain things...I don't like to find content within a thread and won't look that up, for example...if I contest someone's argument I contest it on something more than the fact that they didn't provide a link.
If I have to, I'll find the information myself and link it, just so I can debunk it or show it up as garbage.
Way to chime in and try to defend the indefensible. LOL However, you do have a nack for that don't you?
There IS a form for debate and on this board it is that if you make the claim the burden is on you to provide the substance to support the claim.
Failure to do so is seen on this board as providing one's own unsubstantiate opinon which has no validity.
So are you claiming that you don't demand that others provide links to support their claims?? Really??
Defend the INDEFENSIBLE?
Shut up, you pompous twit. You are the very last person on this board who should be lecturing about proper debate form.
Attacking him with ad hom is not refutation of his statements.
LOL
Yo stupid, the refutation is independent of the ad hom. Refute, THEN call the fucking moron a fucking moron....
Attacking him with ad hom is not refutation of his statements.
Yo stupid, the refutation is independent of the ad hom. Refute, THEN call the fucking moron a fucking moron....
More ad hom, I see.
Thank you for providing an example of the trivialization of the threat of Islam (Lasher).
While it is true that radical muslims are a definite threat to America's safety, we must not overlook the reason why they hate us so.