🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Why do liberals support political censorship by Big Tech and the dying media?

Nationalism was why Hitler was a bad actor. Nationalism is not a good thing.

Nationalism, nationalism was why Hitler was one of the evilest men in history?

Wow!

Beam%20me%20up-S.jpg
 
So, freedoms of speech and the press are only for those who are somehow designated in some official way as authorized “journalists”?

Actually, the Founding Slave Rapists thought so, as they designated a difference between "Speech" and "the Press". The Press being subject to libel laws.

Point being, Facebook has no obligation to repeat a slanderous Hunter Biden story...

You know good and well that is not what is being discussed. Typical far-left liberal if you can't argue the facts, answer a different question.

As you know, this is the issue.

Trump has lied 20,000 times since getting into office, including a lot of racist comments. That he's only been censored 194 times is kind of shocking.
 
Or....you can just Parler up and flee to your safe space where you won't be exposed to views that trigger you.

Like, say.....election results.

Do you mean like you do on the DailyKOS?

I can look pretty much anywhere for the election results.

While conservatives are being triggered by Fox News and fleeing to the more comforting OAN and NewMaxTV.

These aren't folks that handle contradiction well. They need everything catered to them or they trigger.
 
Nationalism, nationalism was why Hitler was one of the evilest men in history?

Wow!

Um, yeah, when you want to kill POLISH Nationals so GERMAN Nationals have more land, um, that's a bad thing.

Sorry to point that out to you.

Of course, in the end, Germany lost a bunch of territory, because the whole world saw his nationalism as a bad thing. And Germany was divided for 45 years.
 
So, freedoms of speech and the press are only for those who are somehow designated in some official way as authorized “journalists”?

Actually, the Founding Slave Rapists thought so, as they designated a difference between "Speech" and "the Press". The Press being subject to libel laws.

Point being, Facebook has no obligation to repeat a slanderous Hunter Biden story...

You know good and well that is not what is being discussed. Typical far-left liberal if you can't argue the facts, answer a different question.

As you know, this is the issue.

Trump has lied 20,000 times since getting into office, including a lot of racist comments. That he's only been censored 194 times is kind of shocking.
Facebook has an obligation to refrain from censorship if it wants protection from being sued under section 230, you fucking moron.
 
Not if they claim protection under rule 230, shit for brains.

You keep telling yourself that...

Fact is, Facebook does a lot of good work censoring out the bad actors, they probably need to do more, like the Kenosha Militia that resulted in those people being killed.
In other words, it's doing the work of the police state. No wonder you defend it.

BTW, shit for brains, the Kenosha Militia had nothing to do with what happened in Kenosha.

You are truly a misinformed delusional moron.
 
Nationalism, nationalism was why Hitler was one of the evilest men in history?

Wow!

Um, yeah, when you want to kill POLISH Nationals so GERMAN Nationals have more land, um, that's a bad thing.

Sorry to point that out to you.

Of course, in the end, Germany lost a bunch of territory, because the whole world saw his nationalism as a bad thing. And Germany was divided for 45 years.
"Only an idiot believes that nationalism means you want to kill everyone who isn't part of your nation.

All you did is demonstrate what a fucking idiot you are.
 
Fact is, Facebook does a lot of good work censoring out the bad actors…

That you think that this censorship is a good thing only goes to show how fucked up and full of shit your position really is.

Of these really are “bad actors”, as you want us to believe, then your purpose would best be served by letting their message get out into the open, where we can see and judge it for ourselves, and know from that that they are bad actors; just as we can clearly see that you are a bad actor, because we are allowed to read and judge your message of censorship and tyranny for ourselves.

You want us to take it on your word that certain individuals and organizations are “bad actors” without us having the chance to see their message for ourselves. Why is that? Could it be that you know damn well that you are full of shit, and that if we were allowed to see these messages for ourselves, that your lies would be clearly exposed as such? That is the only rational reason why a piece of shit such as yourself would be in favor of censorship.
 
BTW, shit for brains, the Kenosha Militia had nothing to do with what happened in Kenosha.

JoeB131 is just pissed off because that night, some violent subhuman pieces of shit—including at least one known childfucker—were put out of our misery. Nothing pisses him off more than putting down such animals to the benefit of actual human beings.
 
@JoeB131 is just pissed off because that night, some violent subhuman pieces of @shit—including at least one known childfucker—were put out of our misery. Nothing pisses him off more than putting down such animals to the benefit of actual human beings.

Actually, no, Mormon Bob, what bothers me is this guy shot randomly into the crowd and killed two people.

The person you brand as a child-fucker was himself a victim of child sexual abuse. Not to excuse what he did, but he was a victim as much as a criminal. There was no excuse for this punk to go up there, and start shooting people.

He'll spend the rest of his life in jail for this mistake that the gun culture goaded him into.
 
That you think that this censorship is a good thing only goes to show how fucked up and full of @shit your position really is.

Of these really are “bad actors”, as you want us to believe, then your purpose would best be served by letting their message get out into the open, where we can see and judge it for ourselves, and know from that that they are bad actors; just as we can clearly see that you are a bad actor, because we are allowed to read and judge your message of censorship and tyranny for ourselves.

Actually, there's nothing to stop the bad actors from getting their own websites to preach their messages of hate. Of course, this is the only country where such hate groups aren't outlawed.. In Europe, they throw these people in jail.

You want us to take it on your word that certain individuals and organizations are “bad actors” without us having the chance to see their message for ourselves. Why is that? Could it be that you know damn well that you are full of @shit, and that if we were allowed to see these messages for ourselves, that your lies would be clearly exposed as such? That is the only rational reason why a piece of @shit such as yourself would be in favor of censorship.

Actually, I'm reluctant to give them a voice because they'd probably encourage already mentally unstable people... Frankly, I'm seeing ever higher anger levels on the right, and I don't think you guys are going to get any saner on the outside looking in.
 
@JoeB131 is just pissed off because that night, some violent subhuman pieces of @shit—including at least one known childfucker—were put out of our misery. Nothing pisses him off more than putting down such animals to the benefit of actual human beings.

Actually, no, Mormon Bob, what bothers me is this guy shot randomly into the crowd and killed two people.

Wrong, moron, he didn't shoot randomly. He shot at some thugs are were assaulting him, and possibly trying to kill him. Arguing with a douchebag like you because you refuse to be honest.

The person you brand as a child-fucker was himself a victim of child sexual abuse. Not to excuse what he did, but he was a victim as much as a criminal. There was no excuse for this punk to go up there, and start shooting people.

He'll spend the rest of his life in jail for this mistake that the gun culture goaded him into.

That doesn't give him an excuse for criminal assault. Kyle never had any intention of shooting anyone.
 
Actually, there's nothing to stop the bad actors from getting their own websites to preach their messages of hate. Of course, this is the only country where such hate groups aren't outlawed.. In Europe, they throw these people in jail.

There are some very good reasons why this country fought two wars to establish our right not to be like the degenerate shitholes of Europe.

That is one of them.
 
That you think that this censorship is a good thing only goes to show how fucked up and full of @shit your position really is.

Of these really are “bad actors”, as you want us to believe, then your purpose would best be served by letting their message get out into the open, where we can see and judge it for ourselves, and know from that that they are bad actors; just as we can clearly see that you are a bad actor, because we are allowed to read and judge your message of censorship and tyranny for ourselves.

Actually, there's nothing to stop the bad actors from getting their own websites to preach their messages of hate. Of course, this is the only country where such hate groups aren't outlawed.. In Europe, they throw these people in jail.

You want us to take it on your word that certain individuals and organizations are “bad actors” without us having the chance to see their message for ourselves. Why is that? Could it be that you know damn well that you are full of @shit, and that if we were allowed to see these messages for ourselves, that your lies would be clearly exposed as such? That is the only rational reason why a piece of @shit such as yourself would be in favor of censorship.

Actually, I'm reluctant to give them a voice because they'd probably encourage already mentally unstable people... Frankly, I'm seeing ever higher anger levels on the right, and I don't think you guys are going to get any saner on the outside looking in.
You are one of the bad actors, moron. The first amendment is what makes the US superior to all those European authoritarian people's republics. I can't imagine anything worse for this country than some douchebag like you having any degree of control over what other people can say.
 
You are one of the bad actors, moron. The first amendment is what makes the US superior to all those European authoritarian people's republics. I can't imagine anything worse for this country than some douchebag like you having any degree of control over what other people can say.

I'm not the one inciting violence, guy.

That would be your side.
 

Forum List

Back
Top