Nationalism was why Hitler was a bad actor. Nationalism is not a good thing.
Nationalism, nationalism was why Hitler was one of the evilest men in history?
Wow!
![Beam%20me%20up-S.jpg](https://photos.smugmug.com/Frequently/Few-Fries-Short/i-t2Vcm8c/0/91c9279e/S/Beam%20me%20up-S.jpg)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Nationalism was why Hitler was a bad actor. Nationalism is not a good thing.
Not if they claim protection under rule 230, shit for brains.Can someone help out Jones? He doesn’t want to answer the question, yet he fancies himself an expert.
IS TWITTER A PLATFORM OR A PUBLISHER?
It doesn't matter. Either way, it has the right to edit content to protect itself legally or just because they feel like it.
So, freedoms of speech and the press are only for those who are somehow designated in some official way as authorized “journalists”?
You know good and well that is not what is being discussed. Typical far-left liberal if you can't argue the facts, answer a different question.
As you know, this is the issue.
Or....you can just Parler up and flee to your safe space where you won't be exposed to views that trigger you.
Like, say.....election results.
Do you mean like you do on the DailyKOS?
Nationalism, nationalism was why Hitler was one of the evilest men in history?
Wow!
Not if they claim protection under rule 230, shit for brains.
Facebook has an obligation to refrain from censorship if it wants protection from being sued under section 230, you fucking moron.So, freedoms of speech and the press are only for those who are somehow designated in some official way as authorized “journalists”?
Actually, the Founding Slave Rapists thought so, as they designated a difference between "Speech" and "the Press". The Press being subject to libel laws.
Point being, Facebook has no obligation to repeat a slanderous Hunter Biden story...
You know good and well that is not what is being discussed. Typical far-left liberal if you can't argue the facts, answer a different question.
As you know, this is the issue.
Trump has lied 20,000 times since getting into office, including a lot of racist comments. That he's only been censored 194 times is kind of shocking.
In other words, it's doing the work of the police state. No wonder you defend it.Not if they claim protection under rule 230, shit for brains.
You keep telling yourself that...
Fact is, Facebook does a lot of good work censoring out the bad actors, they probably need to do more, like the Kenosha Militia that resulted in those people being killed.
"Only an idiot believes that nationalism means you want to kill everyone who isn't part of your nation.Nationalism, nationalism was why Hitler was one of the evilest men in history?
Wow!
Um, yeah, when you want to kill POLISH Nationals so GERMAN Nationals have more land, um, that's a bad thing.
Sorry to point that out to you.
Of course, in the end, Germany lost a bunch of territory, because the whole world saw his nationalism as a bad thing. And Germany was divided for 45 years.
Trump has lied 20,000 times since getting into office, including a lot of racist comments.
Fact is, Facebook does a lot of good work censoring out the bad actors…
BTW, shit for brains, the Kenosha Militia had nothing to do with what happened in Kenosha.
@JoeB131 is just pissed off because that night, some violent subhuman pieces of @shit—including at least one known childfucker—were put out of our misery. Nothing pisses him off more than putting down such animals to the benefit of actual human beings.
That you think that this censorship is a good thing only goes to show how fucked up and full of @shit your position really is.
Of these really are “bad actors”, as you want us to believe, then your purpose would best be served by letting their message get out into the open, where we can see and judge it for ourselves, and know from that that they are bad actors; just as we can clearly see that you are a bad actor, because we are allowed to read and judge your message of censorship and tyranny for ourselves.
You want us to take it on your word that certain individuals and organizations are “bad actors” without us having the chance to see their message for ourselves. Why is that? Could it be that you know damn well that you are full of @shit, and that if we were allowed to see these messages for ourselves, that your lies would be clearly exposed as such? That is the only rational reason why a piece of @shit such as yourself would be in favor of censorship.
@JoeB131 is just pissed off because that night, some violent subhuman pieces of @shit—including at least one known childfucker—were put out of our misery. Nothing pisses him off more than putting down such animals to the benefit of actual human beings.
Actually, no, Mormon Bob, what bothers me is this guy shot randomly into the crowd and killed two people.
The person you brand as a child-fucker was himself a victim of child sexual abuse. Not to excuse what he did, but he was a victim as much as a criminal. There was no excuse for this punk to go up there, and start shooting people.
He'll spend the rest of his life in jail for this mistake that the gun culture goaded him into.
Actually, there's nothing to stop the bad actors from getting their own websites to preach their messages of hate. Of course, this is the only country where such hate groups aren't outlawed.. In Europe, they throw these people in jail.
You are one of the bad actors, moron. The first amendment is what makes the US superior to all those European authoritarian people's republics. I can't imagine anything worse for this country than some douchebag like you having any degree of control over what other people can say.That you think that this censorship is a good thing only goes to show how fucked up and full of @shit your position really is.
Of these really are “bad actors”, as you want us to believe, then your purpose would best be served by letting their message get out into the open, where we can see and judge it for ourselves, and know from that that they are bad actors; just as we can clearly see that you are a bad actor, because we are allowed to read and judge your message of censorship and tyranny for ourselves.
Actually, there's nothing to stop the bad actors from getting their own websites to preach their messages of hate. Of course, this is the only country where such hate groups aren't outlawed.. In Europe, they throw these people in jail.
You want us to take it on your word that certain individuals and organizations are “bad actors” without us having the chance to see their message for ourselves. Why is that? Could it be that you know damn well that you are full of @shit, and that if we were allowed to see these messages for ourselves, that your lies would be clearly exposed as such? That is the only rational reason why a piece of @shit such as yourself would be in favor of censorship.
Actually, I'm reluctant to give them a voice because they'd probably encourage already mentally unstable people... Frankly, I'm seeing ever higher anger levels on the right, and I don't think you guys are going to get any saner on the outside looking in.
As always, without fail, you can count on @JoeB131 to take the side of subhuman criminal filth—even childfuckers—against that of actual human beings.
Always.
You are one of the bad actors, moron. The first amendment is what makes the US superior to all those European authoritarian people's republics. I can't imagine anything worse for this country than some douchebag like you having any degree of control over what other people can say.