Why do school board hearings cut parents from reading sexually explicit excerpts because of children?

[whitehall]

The ultimate in hypocrisy. They can teach this filth to kids but when you complain about it they say it's too obscene to be heard in public.

 

[Concerned American]

The ultimate in hypocrisy. They can teach this filth to kids but when you complain about it they say it's too obscene to be heard in public.

Thank you. Libtards can't figure out that the OP is about hypocrisy and not censorship.

 

[LeftofLeft]

In that case, the difference between a G rating and PG13 must make your head explode.

No, the ratings are pretty consistent and you continue to fail to defend or even explain the hypocrisy of the board.

 

[LeftofLeft]

At this point, I would just ask the Boards to not be offended when people are reading excerpts from books they approved. No one has yet to defend this.

 

[Blaster]

At this point, I would just ask the Boards to not be offended when people are reading excerpts from books they approved. No one has yet to defend this.

Alaska board members brawl over silencing dad exposing book on kinks and sexting: 'I'm going to interrupt you'

A school board in Anchorage, Alaska, voted to cut off a dad's public comment as he spoke out against a sexually explicit book in the district.

www.foxnews.com

 

[easyt65]

Can anyone explain this logic? Parents concerned about sexually explicit content available in school libraries for children to read take their case to school board meetings, read the excerpts to demonstrate how explicit this is for children, then the board cuts them off because children are present either in-person or virtually? Yet the boards stand firm on leaving the book in place.

'If something is too obscene to be spoken about in front of adults, then it’s too obscene to be given to children.'

Such a simple statement, one liberals / Democrats prove they are incapable of grasping, proves just how INSANE Democrats have become.

Again, it is not how FAR TO THE LEFT they have gone but rather how INSANE they have gone.

 

[Blaster]

'If something is too obscene to be spoken about in front of adults, then it’s too obscene to be given to children.'

Such a simple statement, one liberals / Democrats prove they are incapable of grasping, proves just how INSANE Democrats have become.

Again, it is not how FAR TO THE LEFT they have gone but rather how INSANE they have gone.

Teaching porn to young children is sick.

 

[easyt65]

Teaching porn to young children is sick.

...which leads us to the obvious: Those targeting children and doing so are not 'Progressive' - they are SICK.

 

[LeftofLeft]

'If something is too obscene to be spoken about in front of adults, then it’s too obscene to be given to children.'

Such a simple statement, one liberals / Democrats prove they are incapable of grasping, proves just how INSANE Democrats have become.

Again, it is not how FAR TO THE LEFT they have gone but rather how INSANE they have gone.

The Left doesn’t want it read out loud not because they will be offended but because they don’t want to be exposed for their agenda of grooming children sexually.

 

[Blaster]

The Left doesn’t want it read out loud not because they will be offended but because they don’t want to be exposed for their agenda of grooming children sexually.

They would rather work in secret.

 

[Frankenstein]

I believe it's very simple, they were presented with the problem, and did not want to upset the lets have sexually explicit books in our schools crowd, and allowed it hoping no one would notice. When someone noticed, they are ashamed and do not want the evidence read.