Why do you believe that the rich deserve 90% +

Why do you republicans believe that the rich deserve 90% + the wealth, huge tax breaks for anyone making more then one million per year and everyone else should just go fuck themselves? I am serious, why do you believe these people should be able to mistreat their workers, unregulate industiries to mistreat their workers, child labor and to pollute to their hearts intent. Your party is now literally allowing companies to work their workers to death in high heat, decreasing the age bringing back child labor and fighting like hell not to pay the workers right. You seem to enjoy the fact that the ceo makes 1,000 times more then his workers?

Why do you push a form of religion that forces these same little people to live a certain way when they're not breaking their backs for their betters? You must enjoy torturing the hell out of your follow man....Why do you think going back to the 18th century is even a good idea? It isn't but you seem to be utterly stone aged in your mindset.

Gaslight attempt:

640px-Fail_stamp.jpg

 
I commend Bezos, Gates, et al, for starting small and building something big. No one hates productive people who contribute to society. The problem begins when they acquire the kind of wealth common to small nations and start abusing their power.

But the problem is, the internet allows for the cornering the market if you get in and move quickly into a new area. once these guys got a monopoly, or something very close to it, they started abusing their power, and that's where they violate antitrust laws, and should be held accountable. It's easy for these guys, given the laws, to avoid paying taxes, and on that point, I agree the OP. The OP isn't articulated very well, which could have been written better, and substantiation would be very easy. All of these guys have been subject to congressional scrutiny, etc., etc., etc., regarding these issues.

The fact of the matter is that the upper 50% own 97% of the nation's wealth (proof provided on request, the Fed Reserve wealth distribution tables) and given that fact, they should pay, a progressive tax that rises to 97% of the nation's tax burden. Currently, they pay less than that. The lower 50% own 3% of the nation's wealth but pay more than that percentage in taxes. For poor whom many claim to not pay taxes, not true. For those who cannot hedge, the poor, they pay it in inflation. Inflation is a transfer of wealth from those who cannot hedge (the poor) to those who can hedge (the rich). If you don't grasp this, I will detail it more, but it's a fact. Wealth isn't created out of thin air, though it might seem like it, someone pays the piper somewhere, at some point. The ultimate source of wealth is labor. And the less you work for it, the more others do, for you. If you inherit wealth, that means many others donated their labor for your benefit. That's what it actually means, and if economists started treating money as labor, instead of some bullshit abstraction, we'd come up with better monetary policy.
How is Amazon a monopoly? And how have they abused their power?
 
Dumbest post is the year. Congratulations!
An economic system that creates gross inequality and leads to having a government that is a plutocratic oligarchy serving the interests of the wealthy ruling class at the expense of the public good, shouldn't be allowed. Crony, neo-liberal capitalism should be banned and replaced with a mixed economy where everyone can prosper, not just a few.

Within the next few decades, society is going to be forced by necessity to adopt a more non-profit, democratic, socialistic system of mass production, due to advanced automation and artificial intelligence, until there's no more use for markets or capitalism. The person who told me to "fuck off" and who is laughing at leftists will be the ones "fucking off". The younger generation is socialist and leftist.
 
Last edited:
Go get a job, stop being a leech, making money off of other people's labor. Those who work the productive enterprise should own it collectively and split the profits. The only companies that should exist, while there are markets, are worker-owned cooperatives. Markets will disappear as advanced automation and AI, replace wage-labor. No wage labor or not enough of it = no market or capitalism. Socialism is the natural successor of capitalism, thanks to advanced automation and AI.
what in the holy fuck are you talking about??

youre the one coveting other peoples money not me to stupid cock sucker,,

and of course you cant say what resources are being hoarded,,

but then again you are just another fucking useless idiot,,
 
Go get a job, stop being a leech, making money off of other people's labor. Those who work the productive enterprise should own it collectively and split the profits. The only companies that should exist, while there are markets, are worker-owned cooperatives. Markets will disappear as advanced automation and AI, replace wage-labor. No wage labor or not enough of it = no market or capitalism. Socialism is the natural successor of capitalism, thanks to advanced automation and AI.
and millions dead is the natural successor to socialism,,
 
I know it's terrible. The rich do need to pay more of their share so the wealth gets redistributed. More socialism in the USA would be the best thing for America and universal free healthcare. There is that old cliche they will say that if people want to make more money they just need to work harder and move up the food chain. Moving up to better paying jobs is not possible for many workers due to their limitations. A lot of people work two full time jobs and still struggle to make even a livable wage. My wife has worked a full time job at fast food and a 2nd full time job as a housekeeping for years, it still is not enough money to survive she rely's a lot on me and family members for support. Like many Americans moving up the food chain into better paying jobs is not possible for her, she was labelled mentally slow in school by teachers and got all "F"s and "D"'s in high school. There are many Americans who have to work 2-3 jobs just to make enough money to barely survive. They are working their ass off to survive and the rich say they are lazy and need to stop complaining about how little money they make...yeah what a joke.

It's a shame that low-skilled people don't earn very much.
They'd benefit more from a secure border and mass deportations than from a $20 minimum wage or higher taxes on the rich.
 
and millions dead is the natural successor to socialism,,
You say that as if capitalist imperialism doesn't have its own mountain of stinking, rotting corpses under its feet. Capitalist fans like you have no moral high ground upon which to stand and point their crooked feculent finger at communists. Wars are deadly, people die.

The only reason you resort to disingenuous, hypocritical death toll arguments is because you know that if you debate the points that I'm making in my posts, you'll get your ass kicked. All you have left is mud-slinging, playing the victim, trying to demonize communists. That's all you have, nothing intelligent or of substance that you can use to rebut my points, just "you're bad people, bad bad bad...you're mean, bad"..As if capitalist-imperialists are saints with halos glowing over their heads, and clean hands.

Communism is the inevitable, natural successor/inheritor of capitalism, due to advanced automation and artificial intelligence. Smart capitalists know this, hence they beg the government to give their customer base a "free check", a so-called "UBI - UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME", in order to keep capitalism on life-support. That UBI is really a universal income, not a "basic" income. It becomes the only income people have under high-tech capitalism, essentially a monthly government bailout for the wealthy ruling elites.

We, communists, welcome advanced automation and artificial intelligence, nano-technology, robotics and quantum computing, all of which make mass production, easy and communism thrive, making capitalism die. What makes us alive as communists with respect to mass production and economics, makes capitalism die. It kills capitalism. Communism is the future, capitalism is obsolete and hence unnecessary and untenable. It can't survive high-tech mass production, only communism can.
 
It's a shame that low-skilled people don't earn very much.
They'd benefit more from a secure border and mass deportations than from a $20 minimum wage or higher taxes on the rich.
They would indeed benefit from a stricter immigration policy, and also from higher wages and the right to an education and training. It's up to society, to us, to make that happen. We decide what the rules of immigration, and mass production are, along with what constitutes human rights. We decide that. You, me and everybody else.
 
You say that as if capitalist imperialism doesn't have its own mountain of stinking, rotting corpses under its feet. Capitalist fans like you have no moral high ground upon which to stand and point their crooked feculent finger at communists. Wars are deadly, people die.

The only reason you resort to disingenuous, hypocritical death toll arguments is because you know that if you debate the points that I'm making in my posts, you'll get your ass kicked. All you have left is mud-slinging, playing the victim, trying to demonize communists. That's all you have, nothing intelligent or of substance that you can use to rebut my points, just "you're bad people, bad bad bad...you're mean, bad"..As if capitalist-imperialists are saints with halos glowing over their heads, and clean hands.

Communism is the inevitable, natural successor/inheritor of capitalism, due to advanced automation and artificial intelligence. Smart capitalists know this, hence they beg the government to give their customer base a "free check", a so-called "UBI - UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME", in order to keep capitalism on life-support. That UBI is really a universal income, not a "basic" income. It becomes the only income people have under high-tech capitalism, essentially a monthly government bailout for the wealthy ruling elites.

We, communists, welcome advanced automation and artificial intelligence, nano-technology, robotics and quantum computing, all of which make mass production, easy and communism thrive, making capitalism die. What makes us alive as communists with respect to mass production and economics, makes capitalism die. It kills capitalism. Communism is the future, capitalism is obsolete and hence unnecessary and untenable. It can't survive high-tech mass production, only communism can.
oh for fucks sake would you just go away with your death cult talking points,,

answer me this,,

how many people are you willing to kill to get your way??
 
They would indeed benefit from a stricter immigration policy, and also from higher wages and the right to an education and training. It's up to society, to us, to make that happen. We decide what the rules of immigration, and mass production are, along with what constitutes human rights. We decide that. You, me and everybody else.
we already have a right to education,, its called a library and actually going out and doing the work,,
 
oh for fucks sake would you just go away with your death cult talking points,,

answer me this,,

how many people are you willing to kill to get your way??
I don't do interviews with disingenuous, bad actors. How many would you kill to maintain the status quo and obsolete system of capitalism?
 
we already have a right to education,, its called a library and actually going out and doing the work,,
An education from pre-kinder to university - graduate school. That includes vocational - job training.
Job Corps is a good government-funded program, but it needs to be improved by getting rid of the private contractors.

 
This is stupid. You've addressed nothing. And the reality of business is those guys didn't earn anything alone. As for your third line, nobody pushes that.
Spoken like a Liberally educated gubmint teat-sucker. Nobody or no entity helped me and I know lots of people who advanced from lower income parents to upper income wealth. As usual you don't know what you are talking about.
 
I don't do interviews with disingenuous, bad actors. How many would you kill to maintain the status quo and obsolete system of capitalism?
any and everyone that comes to stop me will die a horrible death,,

and the staus quo isnt capitalism,, its cronyism which is just how all socialist systems work,,

if youre connected you get a free ride,, the rest are left to pick through the garbage
 
An education from pre-kinder to university - graduate school. That includes vocational - job training.
Job Corps is a good government-funded program, but it needs to be improved by getting rid of the private contractors.

government doesnt fund anything,, they steal from hard working people and give it to losers like you that dont want to work for anything,,
 
They would indeed benefit from a stricter immigration policy, and also from higher wages and the right to an education and training. It's up to society, to us, to make that happen.
Agreed. The question is, "Is it up to government?"
 
Wait a minute, democrats are in charge. Only a small minded ignorant person would reduce the complicated world of finance and taxes to "go fuck yourself" but that's typical of the TDS left these days.
 
Why do you republicans believe that the rich deserve 90% + the wealth, huge tax breaks for anyone making more then one million per year and everyone else should just go fuck themselves? I am serious, why do you believe these people should be able to mistreat their workers, unregulate industiries to mistreat their workers, child labor and to pollute to their hearts intent. Your party is now literally allowing companies to work their workers to death in high heat, decreasing the age bringing back child labor and fighting like hell not to pay the workers right. You seem to enjoy the fact that the ceo makes 1,000 times more then his workers?

Why do you push a form of religion that forces these same little people to live a certain way when they're not breaking their backs for their betters? You must enjoy torturing the hell out of your follow man....Why do you think going back to the 18th century is even a good idea? It isn't but you seem to be utterly stone aged in your mindset.
I think you may have set the USMB record for the most false premises in a single post.
 
I believe our tax system is grossly unfair to people whose income is earned through the old-fashioned way: they worked for it.

How do you figure?

You want an inheritance to be considered income?

So, can you now understand that a person earning his money through labor is discriminated against by our tax code in comparison to money coming from wealth? It's little wonder with our congress long known for being the best that money can buy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top