Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't seem to care who has them.
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
No one needs a 30 round magazine.
I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.
Except that the Second Amendment does not contain the word Musket numbskull. Who are you decide how individuals may, or may not exercise their Constitutional Rights? If you claim to support the Constitution the way it was intended, then what part of the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed do you find so difficult to grasp?
Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.
Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
I do! You selling one?
I need one for my M-1.
30 rounds, 30-06 please and thank you!
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
please define "assault weapon".....
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
And again, define an "Assault Weapon"
I'm bored with you again.
You don't seem to care who has them.
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
You don't seem to care who has them.
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop?
You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
You don't seem to care who has them.
I support laws restricting felons from having weapons, and if you can prove in a court a person is mentally deficicent, they can and have been restricted as well.
I have no issue with quick background checks as well.
What I have an issue with is this percieved notion that if we ban a given type of weapon we will prevent criminals or people who just one day snap from causing harm to others.
And who the fuck are you to judge what I care about?
You asked me to find a Repub who want mentally unstable people owning or having access to guns.
Try and keep up.
You don't seem to care who has them.
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
And again, define an "Assault Weapon"
I'm bored with you again.
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
talking out your butt is far less dangerous than usurping Freedoms based solely upon emotions without regard for rational thought. You numbskull gun grabbers need tragedies like Columbine, and Sandy Hook to steal away people's Rights when they are compromised by their feelings... Which I find truly despicable.
You don't seem to care who has them.
I find the police to be about the most violent and dangerous group of thugs around. I want the average citizen to be at LEAST as well armed as the police.
You promote and support a police state, as is the way of the left, so naturally you desire to disarm the populace.
Which murderer who shot up schools, theaters, military bases, etc. was a cop? You are obviously talking out your ample butt again. I'm just trying to tell you assault weapons need to be banned. Enough of your silliness already.
The sadly ironic part of this whole debate is that most "gun crime" involves handguns. "Assault weapons" are used in so few violent crimes that, even if Congress could wave a magic wand and make them all disappear, the reduction of violent crime would be minimal at best.
Gun grabbers have it so ass-backwards that they aren't even banning the right guns.
Why does anybody need a 30-round magazine?
Better question, why doesn't everyone have a 30-round magazine and properly trained to use it? Take the fight to terrorists both foreign and domestic.
Cause Deer have 50 round magazines?
Someone threatens to take your toys away and you become unhinged. Just more proof why the average citizen doesn't need and shouldn't have a gun.
The average citizen is stupid. Are you equally prepared to say that they shouldn't have the right to speak freely? To vote? The average citizen is innocent. Shall we do away with their right to privacy a la the 4th amendment?
How many kids were killed using free speech? Thanks for missing the point.
You guys need to think your witty responses through before typing them out.
