Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What you are is a little man on the Internet, who apparently understands neither Capitalism nor Marxism. We'll leave it at that.I'm not squirming out of anything. I'm telling you that your Sunday School versions of economics systems are not reality. Both Capitalism and Marxism are things you obviously know nothing about, which means you haven't studied them, like most here.
I'm an MBA in Finance and career manager, management consultant, and now a business owner. I worked on Wall Street both for financial services firms and management consulting firms. So your claim I haven't studied them is wrong.
So man up and back up what you're arguing they are. I'm particularly interested in your calling BS to my stating Communism is defined by the Communist Manifesto. Grow a pair, back it up, and stop running, coward.
And a solution to the Free-Rider problem, mandatory participation.That's bullshit. Yes, the idea was founded in the Heritage Foundation, but the idea never had broad support in the GOP.
We know what Republicans broadly support - tort reform and freeing up competition Amongst issuers in the open market.
The idea of any kind of mandate has never been part of the republican platform.
Case in point, no understanding of either.You don't understand Capitalism, but that's to be expected. Very few here do. Even less so Marxism.Government creates the Middle Class. It's not natural to Capitalism.By "you", little housepainter means government, not the people.
That makes him completely wrong, of course.
The economy sucks when the people don't spread the cash around... by buying, selling, and working.
Government has little to do with such activities... except to the degree it can prevent them, by taxation and restriction (the only powers government has).
Looks like little housepainter is continuing his 0-for-everything record of being wrong.
In fact, capitalism created the middle class, by providing the only means by which formerly-poor people could work their way up, AND a concrete incentive to do so.
Capitalism is merely commerce with no interference from government, except the obvious needs of criminal prosecution and contract enforcement. Finally landlords, kneecappers and unrestrained revenooers could no longer take everything that people managed to accumulate, and those people finally started rising into a middle class they could not have aspired to in previous generations.
Little housepainter is, of course, pushing government policies that reverse many generations of that trend, in the name of "spreading the wealth around" or other disguises for govt theft.
Capitalism is simply economic freedom. It's where the players in a market (suppliers & consumers) make their own choices.
Communism refers to interestingly enough ... principles of the communist manifesto ... Which is why Democrats are communists, they adhere not only to the principles, but use the same anti-capitalist, anti-rich rhetoric to justify it.
Your support for his Appeal to Authority is noted. When either of you can make an argument worthy of debate, let me know.What you are is a little man on the Internet, who apparently understands neither Capitalism nor Marxism. We'll leave it at that.I'm an MBA in Finance and career manager, management consultant, and now a business owner. I worked on Wall Street both for financial services firms and management consulting firms. So your claim I haven't studied them is wrong.
So man up and back up what you're arguing they are. I'm particularly interested in your calling BS to my stating Communism is defined by the Communist Manifesto. Grow a pair, back it up, and stop running, coward.
TRANSLATION: I can't refute anything you said, nor impeach your credentials, which are far more solid than mine. So I'll call you a few names, repeat my standard empty denials, and run away, hoping you don't keep pointing out the truth where regular people (my enemies) can hear you, and I'll try to change the subject to other things.
And a solution to the Free-Rider problem, mandatory participation.
The idea of any kind of mandate has never been part of the republican platform.
The gop never had HC in the platform, but gop pols have supported a mandate. That doesn't mean the gop has to be saddled with it forever, but it's disingenuous to simply run from it.
Moreover, there are hard and soft mandates. The dems chose the hard because, I suppose, they're comfortable telling people they must do something or another. There's no reason not to have a soft mandate that simply penalizes a person for waiting to sign up until they actually get sick. They would still have the libertarian option of simply dying without expensive care.
Name a country that does not regulate Capitalism, or any other form of economy? Since there is none, tell us why that is? What's the problem here if Capitalism, or any other system, is so wonderful?Case in point, no understanding of either.Capitalism is simply economic freedom. It's where the players in a market (suppliers & consumers) make their own choices.
Communism refers to interestingly enough ... principles of the communist manifesto ... Which is why Democrats are communists, they adhere not only to the principles, but use the same anti-capitalist, anti-rich rhetoric to justify it.
Caught in the spotlight beam, little housepainter can do nothing but deny, deny, deny, as expected.
Capitalism, being simply the absence of government control and regulation to an otherwise thriving economy, is anathema to the big-government pushers who sent him here. They're not going to like such a blatant failure to persuade people to accept and submit to their agenda. But there's plenty more eager shills where he came from.
What you are is a little man on the Internet, who apparently understands neither Capitalism nor Marxism. We'll leave it at that.I'm not squirming out of anything. I'm telling you that your Sunday School versions of economics systems are not reality. Both Capitalism and Marxism are things you obviously know nothing about, which means you haven't studied them, like most here.
I'm an MBA in Finance and career manager, management consultant, and now a business owner. I worked on Wall Street both for financial services firms and management consulting firms. So your claim I haven't studied them is wrong.
So man up and back up what you're arguing they are. I'm particularly interested in your calling BS to my stating Communism is defined by the Communist Manifesto. Grow a pair, back it up, and stop running, coward.
Fire away if you can? So far, not so much.What you are is a little man on the Internet, who apparently understands neither Capitalism nor Marxism. We'll leave it at that.I'm an MBA in Finance and career manager, management consultant, and now a business owner. I worked on Wall Street both for financial services firms and management consulting firms. So your claim I haven't studied them is wrong.
So man up and back up what you're arguing they are. I'm particularly interested in your calling BS to my stating Communism is defined by the Communist Manifesto. Grow a pair, back it up, and stop running, coward.
You're a coward who talks big until you run into someone who knows what they are talking about and you realize is going to riddle you with holes, so you pretend you think you're above it while you tuck your tail between your legs and run away. You'll leave it at that.
I'm going to embarrass you, and you know it. Better to save the dignity you can, even if it's only saved in your own mind.
Your support for his Appeal to Authority is noted. When either of you can make an argument worthy of debate, let me know.What you are is a little man on the Internet, who apparently understands neither Capitalism nor Marxism. We'll leave it at that.
TRANSLATION: I can't refute anything you said, nor impeach your credentials, which are far more solid than mine. So I'll call you a few names, repeat my standard empty denials, and run away, hoping you don't keep pointing out the truth where regular people (my enemies) can hear you, and I'll try to change the subject to other things.
Name a country that does not regulate Capitalism, or any other form of economy? Since there is none, tell us why that is? What's the problem here if Capitalism, or any other system, is so wonderful?Case in point, no understanding of either.
Caught in the spotlight beam, little housepainter can do nothing but deny, deny, deny, as expected.
Capitalism, being simply the absence of government control and regulation to an otherwise thriving economy, is anathema to the big-government pushers who sent him here. They're not going to like such a blatant failure to persuade people to accept and submit to their agenda. But there's plenty more eager shills where he came from.
Fire away if you can? So far, not so much.What you are is a little man on the Internet, who apparently understands neither Capitalism nor Marxism. We'll leave it at that.
You're a coward who talks big until you run into someone who knows what they are talking about and you realize is going to riddle you with holes, so you pretend you think you're above it while you tuck your tail between your legs and run away. You'll leave it at that.
I'm going to embarrass you, and you know it. Better to save the dignity you can, even if it's only saved in your own mind.
Big hat no cattle as we say around here.
Go back to the original post, and tell us all about Capitalism and Marxism? You'll be able to find it, if you are honest that is.Fire away if you can? So far, not so much.You're a coward who talks big until you run into someone who knows what they are talking about and you realize is going to riddle you with holes, so you pretend you think you're above it while you tuck your tail between your legs and run away. You'll leave it at that.
I'm going to embarrass you, and you know it. Better to save the dignity you can, even if it's only saved in your own mind.
Big hat no cattle as we say around here.
Fire away at what? I defined them, you said I was wrong, then bolted and now you're hiding.
Why do governments regulate Capitalism? Are they just being mean? If it's as great as you say it is, then why is it always regulated?Name a country that does not regulate Capitalism, or any other form of economy? Since there is none, tell us why that is? What's the problem here if Capitalism, or any other system, is so wonderful?Caught in the spotlight beam, little housepainter can do nothing but deny, deny, deny, as expected.
Capitalism, being simply the absence of government control and regulation to an otherwise thriving economy, is anathema to the big-government pushers who sent him here. They're not going to like such a blatant failure to persuade people to accept and submit to their agenda. But there's plenty more eager shills where he came from.
When governments control capitalism, they are not being capitalist. The fact that no country is truly capitalist has nothing to do with what capitalism is, which is the claim you made and apparently aren't able to back up.
And that weak shot completely leaves how my definition of Communism being defined by the Communist Manifesto is wrong.
1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.
3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.
4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.
5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.
6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)
7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.
Where are the successes?
greedy Pubs and their insurer cronies- and the tidal wave of total bs the dupes believe, of course...
greedy, lying, polluting,brainwashing, screw the workers mega rich Pub
