Why Does the Left Say "Prophet" Mohammed?

[Seawytch]

As I have already pointed out anything that is not far left to you drones is right wing..

So you guys making such claims proves nothing!

You're spinning is starting to make me dizzy.

Says the irony impaired far left drone!

The problem is you drones are so far to the left that you think left of center is far right!

And thus proving you claiming anything about the "right" is meaningless..

You should just say these are not far left sources, as that would be far more accurate and truthful..

Alright folks - Fox and O'Reilly are now leftwing sources.

Who'd've thunk?

See how the far left will spin things to suit their religious narrative!

Just like them claiming things as "right wing", there are many drones on this board that actually believe socialism is "right wing"..

People can believe what ever they like - doesn't make it true, but it's their choice. Like how Fox News is leftwing. That's an interesting, even entertaining belief system you have.

Indeed. Only I would have stated it thusly:

People can believe what ever they like - doesn't make it true, but it's their choice. Like how Fox News is a news outlet.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

Do Jews believe Christ was/is the Messiah?

Ruh roh. If they did they'd be Christians.

Messianic Judaism is a Biblically based movement of people who, as committed Jews, believe in Yeshua (Jesus) as the Jewish Messiah of Israel of whom the Jewish Law and Prophets spoke.

Messianic Jewis Alliance of America

Then which are the real Jews?

 

[Mac1958]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

Who are you referring to?

 

[Mac1958]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

Who are you referring to?

I already noted that.

Obtuse much?
.

 

[g5000]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

This is an incredibly desperate attempt to find a reason to be fauxraged.

There are frequent references to Jesus Christ. Do you know what Christ means?

It means Messiah. So when you say Jesus Christ, you actually are saying Messiah Jesus. So your premise fails.



There aren't a lot of Jesuses or Moseses running around. Also, most of America is Christian. So when you say "Jesus", everyone knows who you are talking about.

But since there are a lot of Americans who know fuck-all about Islam, you have to be more specific when talking about that religion.

Also, there are a lot of Muslims named Mohammed. So you have to distinguish the Prophet from the guy on the corner.

 

[easyt65]

NOT saying 'Prophet' is NOT 'PC' because NOT saying 'Prophet' is offensive to the Jihadi Terrorists who want to kill us. Can't have that now, can we?!

 

[Roudy]

I was having a burger and the lettuce looked just like Mohammad.

 

[g5000]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.

The president says it.

Your Ministry of Propaganda did not show you the full context:

The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt -- it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted, "Muslims, Christians, we are one." The future must not belong to those who bully women -- it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons. (Applause.)

The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s resources -- it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied. (Applause.)

Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims and Shiite pilgrims. It’s time to heed the words of Gandhi: "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit." (Applause.) Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, that’s the vision we will support.

Among Israelis and Palestinians, the future must not belong to those who turn their backs on a prospect of peace. Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the right of Israel to exist. The road is hard, but the destination is clear -- a secure, Jewish state of Israel and an independent, prosperous Palestine. (Applause.) Understanding that such a peace must come through a just agreement between the parties, America will walk alongside all who are prepared to make that journey.

In Syria, the future must not belong to a dictator who massacres his people. If there is a cause that cries out for protest in the world today, peaceful protest, it is a regime that tortures children and shoots rockets at apartment buildings. And we must remain engaged to assure that what began with citizens demanding their rights does not end in a cycle of sectarian violence.

Together, we must stand with those Syrians who believe in a different vision -- a Syria that is united and inclusive, where children don’t need to fear their own government, and all Syrians have a say in how they are governed -- Sunnis and Alawites, Kurds and Christians. That’s what America stands for. That is the outcome that we will work for -- with sanctions and consequences for those who persecute, and assistance and support for those who work for this common good. Because we believe that the Syrians who embrace this vision will have the strength and the legitimacy to lead.

 

[Montrovant]

Alright folks - Fox and O'Reilly are now leftwing sources.

Who'd've thunk?

See how the far left will spin things to suit their religious narrative!

Just like them claiming things as "right wing", there are many drones on this board that actually believe socialism is "right wing"..

What constitutes a right wing media source?

The definition set by the far left is anything that is not far left..

Good job not answering the question.

I posted a factual answer to the question asked by a far left drone..

Oh, am I a far left drone now? Is anyone NOT a far left drone?

And I wasn't asking what the definition of right wing media is to the far left. Hooray for deflection!

 

[NYcarbineer]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

Who are you referring to?

I already noted that.

Obtuse much?
.

Who on this board insists that you say Prophet Mohammed?

 

[Mac1958]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

Who are you referring to?

I already noted that.

Obtuse much?
.

Who on this board insists that you say Prophet Mohammed?

That's not what I said.

Nowhere will you see me saying that you Regressive Lefties "insist" anyone says anything.

And, here it comes again, DING!

As the USMB King of the Straw Man argument, you know that you are allowed one (1) straw man argument per thread.

You may attempt to communicate with me on another thread, at which I time I will determine whether I will respond.

Too funny.
.

 

[NYcarbineer]

See how the far left will spin things to suit their religious narrative!

Just like them claiming things as "right wing", there are many drones on this board that actually believe socialism is "right wing"..

What constitutes a right wing media source?

The definition set by the far left is anything that is not far left..

Good job not answering the question.

I posted a factual answer to the question asked by a far left drone..

Oh, am I a far left drone now? Is anyone NOT a far left drone?

And I wasn't asking what the definition of right wing media is to the far left. Hooray for deflection!

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

Who are you referring to?

I already noted that.

Obtuse much?
.

Who on this board insists that you say Prophet Mohammed?

That's not what I said.

Nowhere will you see me saying that you Regressive Lefties "insist" anyone says anything.

And, here it comes again, DING!

As the USMB King of the Straw Man argument, you know that you are allowed one (1) straw man argument per thread.

You may attempt to communicate with me on another thread, at which I time I will determine whether I will respond.

Too funny.
.

So now you deny saying this:

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect...

when it's in your quote above?

Which liberals on this board have EVER said 'the Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect?

 

[Seawytch]

What constitutes a right wing media source?

The definition set by the far left is anything that is not far left..

Good job not answering the question.

I posted a factual answer to the question asked by a far left drone..

Oh, am I a far left drone now? Is anyone NOT a far left drone?

And I wasn't asking what the definition of right wing media is to the far left. Hooray for deflection!

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect, but "jeebus" (please note both incorrect spelling and lack of capitalization) is perfectly cool and a fun jab at those damn christers.
.

Who are you referring to?

I already noted that.

Obtuse much?
.

Who on this board insists that you say Prophet Mohammed?

That's not what I said.

Nowhere will you see me saying that you Regressive Lefties "insist" anyone says anything.

And, here it comes again, DING!

As the USMB King of the Straw Man argument, you know that you are allowed one (1) straw man argument per thread.

You may attempt to communicate with me on another thread, at which I time I will determine whether I will respond.

Too funny.
.

So now you deny saying this:

The Regressive Left is a little inconsistent on this.

"The Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect...

when it's in your quote above?

Which liberals on this board have EVER said 'the Prophet Mohammed" should be used in respect?

Fuck on this board...how about anyone anywhere?

 

[Ravi]

To differentiate between Mo and Mohammed Ali.

 

[protectionist]

Rightwing News referring to the Prophet Mohammed. The drones are infesting your grey matter.

You mean Mo the Pedophile ? Oh yeah. That murderer, wife-beater, thief, slave-owner, rapist, animal killer. That guy. Yeah him.

 

[g5000]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

If you are nothing but a regurgitating parrot for your favorite Ministry of Propaganda, the least you could do is admit it:
Why Do the Media Refer to ‘the Prophet Mohammed’?, by Ian Tuttle, National Review

You should change your avatar from a penguin to this:

 

[Rustic]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

The left always appeases cult leaders...

 

[protectionist]

You say this as an insult, while simultaneously not realizing that the "fear" you are talking about is a GOOD thing, a NORMAL thing, an INTELLIGENT thing, and a NECESSARY thing. And there never has been a greater need for it in America, than right now >> (think NUCLEAR)

 

[NYcarbineer]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

If you are nothing but a regurgitating parrot for your favorite Ministry of Propaganda, the least you could do is admit it:
Why Do the Media Refer to ‘the Prophet Mohammed’?, by Ian Tuttle, National Review

You should change your avatar from a penguin to this:

That article is a perfect example of Islamophobia and how it's promoted by the haters of Islam.