Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, duh...Oh, so now you're going back to the past. The tax cut line in your post was for 2017. Guess that means you admit you lost that argument, which you did. So, I understand why you moved the goal posts.
I asked for a very good reason; to show for all to see that you really haven't the first idea of what you're blabbering about.So you asked for no good reason whatsoever since you didn’t know either? I mean talk about stupid and pointless lol
"record setting Obama boom".....ROFLMFAO!Well, duh...
We've had two Supply Side Tax cuts since 2000....in the each instance, revenue declined.
Had the second not occurred during the record setting Obama boom, the revenue loss would have been more pronounced.
To which tax cuts were you referring?
Sockpuppets.
I asked a legit question, which he failed to answer.Non-argument. You lose.
Sure I do. You, on the other hand, believe they are good for the voters.They do..
You don't understand them.
Lol I’m making shit up huh? “It was all in the papers”. What the fuck does that even mean? I mean my god you said the same thing for two of your points.If that were true, why didn’t they make the cut permanent to begin with?
They couldn't without Dem votes. It was in all the papers.
They also wouldn’t do it for the sole fact that it was part of BBB.
Biden tried to make the middle class tax cuts permanent in BBB?
You’re completely making shit up. Again.
Uh yes it was part of the bush tax cut that was always temporary.
Temporary because the Dems all voted against it. It was in all the papers.
He then made it permanent for those making less than 400,000.
Obama's vote totals, in the House, to make the Bush cuts permanent.
View attachment 749810
In the Senate, it was 89 yes, 8 no.
www.cnbc.com
www.washingtonexaminer.com
No, not unless it's supported by the data. It's supported by what Dims do and say.Unless it is supported by the data, you’re being grifted.
Bri,
Is it?
Accurate information and CNBC aren't even in the same galaxy, dullard.Lol I’m making shit up huh? “It was all in the papers”. What the fuck does that even mean? I mean my god you said the same thing for two of your points.
Um yes that was the goal of BBB.
Build Back Better would cut taxes for nearly all households next year, new report finds
Almost all households would get a tax cut in 2022 under the Build Back Better framework. Then things get complicated.
What’s funny about your random Googling is that you can’t even find accurate information for shit.
Oh Todd you tried your best but you just couldn’t deliver. You did give the accurate senate vote count but we both know why you left out the party breakdown: the majority of democrats passed it!
I’m glad I could educate you on the matter though!
How about we all get the same deal they get?The amazons, the googles, the microsofts, the fords, and the super rich all cheat like hell. It is time to force them to pay their goddamn taxes....
The middle class needs the break!
You say that about any source that doesn’t suck republican dick.Accurate information and CNBC aren't even in the same galaxy, dullard.
Nah I’m all for cutting wasteful spending.Why don't democrats seem to understand the consequences of overspending?
No you aren't. Other than the military, you can't name a single budget item that needs to be cut.Nah I’m all for cutting wasteful spending.
Supposing that's true (it isn't), why is it that you can't ever find sources that don't suck democrat dick?You say that about any source that doesn’t suck republican dick.
How many times must I humiliate you in one day, sport?"record setting Obama boom".....ROFLMFAO!
The next time would be your very first, Horseshit.How many times must I humiliate you in one day, sport?
Do you want to go over the facts on spending....again, bri?Obviously you don't because turds like you are always proposing more spending and more taxes.
The facts show revenue increased, unless you twist the facts.Well, duh...
We've had two Supply Side Tax cuts since 2000....in the each instance, revenue declined.
Had the second not occurred during the record setting Obama boom, the revenue loss would have been more pronounced.
To which tax cuts were you referring?
Sockpuppets.
