Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

[The5thHorseman]

No, not unless it's supported by the data. It's supported by what Dims do and say.

So post the data, Bri...

 

[Orangecat]

Nah I’m all for cutting wasteful spending.

I’m for cutting all spending.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The facts show revenue increased, unless you twist the facts.

You mean, like, look at the actual numbers.

Just admit that you were grifted....again.

 

[The5thHorseman]

That's exactly what leftist vermin do.

Sure...hence FOX

 

[Billy000]

Supposing that's true (it isn't), why is it that you can't ever find sources that don't suck democrat dick?

Actually all the sources I read criticize both republicans and democrats. In fact, that’s what most respectable news sources do. Even the especially liberal sources like The Daily Beast or Axios criticize democrats regularly. Why you all choose to ignore this fact speaks to your childishness I guess.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No...because that gives you 32 years, 3 from each, 16 years per.

Now stop stalling and admit that you don't even know where to find the numbers.

You should go back to 1977.

 

[Nostra]

What happens to revenues directly following the two most recent Supply Side tax cuts?

Went up, Simp.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

In FY 2000, receipts were 2.03 trillion....in FY 2003, they were 1.78...

It would take until some time in FY 2005 to catch up.

Meanwhile spending grew 20%

In FY 2000, receipts were 2.03 trillion.

The Internet bubble couldn't go on forever.

 

[The5thHorseman]

You should go back to 1977.

You should understand the data before you run your hole.

It wouldn't do you any good if I did.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Had the second not occurred during the record setting Obama boom,

Yeah, the weakest recovery in US history was awesome!!!

 

[The5thHorseman]

Went up, Simp.

Post the numbers for FY 2000 and FY 2003.

Just the numbers.

 

[bripat9643]

Do you want to go over the facts on spending....again, bri?

Are you ineducable?

When did you ever post any facts?

 

[Oddball]

Actually all the sources I read criticize both republicans and democrats. In fact, that’s what most respectable news sources do. Even the especially liberal sources like The Daily Beast or Axios criticize democrats regularly. Why you all choose to ignore this fact speaks to your childishness I guess.

CNBC was a marginally reputable source 20 years ago....They're total partisan shit now.

 

[Oddball]

When did you ever post any facts?

Never.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Yeah, the weakest recovery in US history was awesome!!!

You're full of slogans.

We haven't provided less fiscal support in any recovery in the post WW2 period.

And yet Obama II generated the third highest number of new jobs of any presidential term not served by Elvis.

 

[The5thHorseman]

When did you ever post any facts?

Brimoron,

You complained about it earlier.

You really are an idiot.

 

[Oddball]

In FY 2000, receipts were 2.03 trillion.

The Internet bubble couldn't go on forever.

Also, there's always going to be a short-term drop in revenues, while the newly unleashed resources circulate in the productive sector....The hack sock puppet knows this, and is not even able to effectively bullshit anyone.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Also, there's always going to be a short-term drop in revenues, while the newly unleashed resources circulate in the productive sector....The hack sock puppet knows this, and is not even able to effectively bullshit anyone.

There's a bunch of complete bullshit.

How long did it take Scrub to surpass FY 2000?

Just the number.

 

[Oddball]

You're full of slogans.

We haven't provided less fiscal support in any recovery in the post WW2 period.

If you don't count the $4 trillion in printed up "value" pumped into Wall Street.

 

[Oddball]

There's a bunch of complete bullshit.

How long did it take Scrub to surpass FY 2000?

Just the number.

"Scrub" didn't do jack shit....The producers who were looted a little bit less did that.