Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

Why does it need to pay for itself?

What if it half pays for itself?

If they cut taxes $1 billion and revenue only declines $500 million, that's a win.
It adds to the debt and most of the tax cut goes to the wealthy...and then you fuckers whine about the debt

The claim that tax cuts "increase revenue" is bullshit. They ADD TO THE DEBT.

Glad to see that you're catching on though
 
It adds to the debt and most of the tax cut goes to the wealthy...and then you fuckers whine about the debt

The claim that tax cuts "increase revenue" is bullshit. They ADD TO THE DEBT.

Glad to see that you're catching on though

It adds to the debt

If my $1 billion tax cut reduced revenue by $500 million, let's cut spending by $600 million.

Look, I just reduced taxes by $1 billion and the debt by $100 million.

The claim that tax cuts "increase revenue" is bullshit.

Tax cuts don't increase economic growth?
 
It adds to the debt

If my $1 billion tax cut reduced revenue by $500 million, let's cut spending by $600 million.

Look, I just reduced taxes by $1 billion and the debt by $100 million.

The claim that tax cuts "increase revenue" is bullshit.

Tax cuts don't increase economic growth?
Todd, please...

Name the POTUS for whom you voted who reduced spending commensurate with the revenue loss from their tax cut..
 
It adds to the debt and most of the tax cut goes to the wealthy...and then you fuckers whine about the debt

The claim that tax cuts "increase revenue" is bullshit. They ADD TO THE DEBT.

Glad to see that you're catching on though
The numbers prove you wrong.
 

Forum List

Back
Top