Why even the NAACP requires photo ids to protest Voter Photo IDS !! Come ON!!!

[AmericanFirst]

Daily Caller?

Seriously?

Liberal logic equals stupid, a mirror image of, well look in a mirror.

 

[hazlnut]

A flyer recommends protestors brings an ID and the far-right loses their shit.


You clowns are too much...

 

[AmericanFirst]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...n-protest-against-photo-id-3.html#post8595071

The OP was in too much of a hurry to exhibit his ignorance and stupidity to check to see if another fellow conservative had already exhibited her ignorance and stupidity.

Ignorant and stupid are both the calling card of libtards like obamaturd and his followers.

 

[AmericanFirst]

A flyer recommends protestors brings an ID and the far-right loses their shit.


You clowns are too much...

We haven't lost anything. The left prove over and over again how mentally retarded they are. Move along folks, the circus of libtards is getting boring.

 

[Kondor3]

A flyer recommends protestors brings an ID and the far-right loses their shit.

You clowns are too much...

We haven't lost anything. The left prove over and over again how mentally retarded they are. Move along folks, the circus of libtards is getting boring.

It's not just the far right laughing...

It's anybody with a sense of humor and irony, not married to the Liberal agenda...

Which includes huge numbers of middle-of-the-road types, as well as right-leaning folk...

Not to worry...

It's just the Opposition bitch-slapping Lefties over the irony and having a good time with it...

Prevents the Lefties from getting too big a swelled head at times like this when there's a Leftie in the Oval Office...

No real harm done...

 

[LoneLaugher]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...n-protest-against-photo-id-3.html#post8595071

The OP was in too much of a hurry to exhibit his ignorance and stupidity to check to see if another fellow conservative had already exhibited her ignorance and stupidity.

Ignorant and stupid are both the calling card of libtards like obamaturd and his followers.

Ooh! Great post! Really great!

 

[LoneLaugher]

What's the over/under on how many other idiots start a thread on this over the next two days?

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Why even the NAACP requires photo ids to protest Voter Photo IDS !! Come ON!!!

And the evidence continues to mount that ignorance and stupidity are prerequisites for being conservative.

There is a Constitutional right to vote, where unwarranted photo ID laws are un-Constitutional; but the Constitution doesn’t apply to private organizations that are at liberty to enact whatever rules they wish. Consequently the NAACP is being neither ‘racist’ nor inconsistent.

Just like that other rightwing nitwit Stephanie, you’ve committed a false comparison fallacy, and the premise of your thread fails accordingly

So we can have photo IDs, background checks, waiting periods, on top of added bogged down government regulations to "safe guard" those who only wish the freedom to exercise their desire to follow in pursuit of the second amendment as outlined in the Constitution, while at the same time offer no "safe guards" to ensure the integrity of voters because OF "the Constitution" argument. This is why that very excuse offered by the left wing holds absolutely no validity. The privilege to vote is the only 'holy grail' protected from government regulations and conditions, yet the belief of one to possess a fire arm can be hindered while somehow still be considered Constitutional. This belief that providing a photo ID is an added burden that's unConstitutional in infringing upon a voter's rights, has already been disproved by the United States Supreme Court. Your argument that such voter ID is un-Constitutional is therefor incorrect.

CRAWFORD ET AL. v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD ET AL.

JUSTICE SCALIA, joined by JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO, was of the view that petitioners’ premise that the voter-identification law might have imposed a special burden on some voters is irrelevant. The law should be upheld because its overall burden is minimal and justified. A law respecting the right to vote should be evaluated under the approach in Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U. S. 428, which calls for application of a deferential, “important regulatory interests” standard for nonsevere, nondiscriminatory restrictions, reserving strict scrutiny for laws that severely restrict the right to vote, id., at 433– 434. The different ways in which Indiana’s law affects different voters are no more than different impacts of the single burden that the law uniformly imposes on all voters: To vote in person, everyone must have and present a photo identification that can be obtained for free. This is a generally applicable, nondiscriminatory voting regulation. The law’s universally applicable requirements are eminently reasonable because the burden of acquiring, possessing, and showing a free photo identification is not a significant increase over the usual voting burdens, and the State’s stated interests are sufficient to sustain that minimal burden.

... the inconvenience of going to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, gathering required documents, and posing for a photograph does not qualify as a substantial burden on most voters’ right to vote, or represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting. The severity of the somewhat heavier burden that may be placed on a limited number of persons—e.g., elderly persons born out-of-state, who may have difficulty obtaining a birth certificate—is mitigated by the fact that eligible voters without photo identification may cast provisional ballots that will be counted if they execute the required affidavit at the circuit court clerk’s office. Even assuming that the burden may not be justified as to a few voters, that conclusion is by no means sufficient to establish petitioners’ right to the relief they seek.
Petitioners bear a heavy burden of persuasion in seeking to invalidate SEA 483 in all its applications.

 

[edthecynic]

Here is the text of one of the flyers used by the NAACP, to inform marchers...

...according to the OP.

With special attention to the last bullet point on the flyer.

They RECOMMEND that they bring a ID for when the police harass them and the Right spins it to mean no one will be allowed to protest without an ID, as if there would be someone there to check IDs.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Why even the NAACP requires photo ids to protest Voter Photo IDS !! Come ON!!!

And the evidence continues to mount that ignorance and stupidity are prerequisites for being conservative.

There is a Constitutional right to vote, where unwarranted photo ID laws are un-Constitutional; but the Constitution doesn’t apply to private organizations that are at liberty to enact whatever rules they wish. Consequently the NAACP is being neither ‘racist’ nor inconsistent.

Just like that other rightwing nitwit Stephanie, you’ve committed a false comparison fallacy, and the premise of your thread fails accordingly

There is no Constitutional right to vote. Several amendments make it required that we allow women and 18 year olds vote But nothing in the Constitution specifics other than that about voting. Voting is determined by LAW.

 

[Kondor3]

"...They RECOMMEND that they bring a ID for when the police harass them and the Right spins it to mean no one will be allowed to protest without an ID, as if there would be someone there to check IDs..."

Doesn't matter... it's all good, clean fun.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Here is the text of one of the flyers used by the NAACP, to inform marchers...

...according to the OP.

With special attention to the last bullet point on the flyer.

They RECOMMEND that they bring a ID for when the police harass them and the Right spins it to mean no one will be allowed to protest without an ID, as if there would be someone there to check IDs.

Your stupidy is bookedmarked