AmericanFirst
Gold Member
- Dec 17, 2009
- 12,204
- 1,062
- 175
Liberal logic equals stupid, a mirror image of, well look in a mirror.Daily Caller?
Seriously?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liberal logic equals stupid, a mirror image of, well look in a mirror.Daily Caller?
Seriously?
Ignorant and stupid are both the calling card of libtards like obamaturd and his followers.
The OP was in too much of a hurry to exhibit his ignorance and stupidity to check to see if another fellow conservative had already exhibited her ignorance and stupidity.
We haven't lost anything. The left prove over and over again how mentally retarded they are. Move along folks, the circus of libtards is getting boring.A flyer recommends protestors brings an ID and the far-right loses their shit.
You clowns are too much...![]()
It's not just the far right laughing...We haven't lost anything. The left prove over and over again how mentally retarded they are. Move along folks, the circus of libtards is getting boring.A flyer recommends protestors brings an ID and the far-right loses their shit.
You clowns are too much...![]()
Ignorant and stupid are both the calling card of libtards like obamaturd and his followers.
The OP was in too much of a hurry to exhibit his ignorance and stupidity to check to see if another fellow conservative had already exhibited her ignorance and stupidity.
And the evidence continues to mount that ignorance and stupidity are prerequisites for being conservative.Why even the NAACP requires photo ids to protest Voter Photo IDS !! Come ON!!!
There is a Constitutional right to vote, where unwarranted photo ID laws are un-Constitutional; but the Constitution doesnt apply to private organizations that are at liberty to enact whatever rules they wish. Consequently the NAACP is being neither racist nor inconsistent.
Just like that other rightwing nitwit Stephanie, youve committed a false comparison fallacy, and the premise of your thread fails accordingly
CRAWFORD ET AL. v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD ET AL.
JUSTICE SCALIA, joined by JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO, was of the view that petitioners premise that the voter-identification law might have imposed a special burden on some voters is irrelevant. The law should be upheld because its overall burden is minimal and justified. A law respecting the right to vote should be evaluated under the approach in Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U. S. 428, which calls for application of a deferential, important regulatory interests standard for nonsevere, nondiscriminatory restrictions, reserving strict scrutiny for laws that severely restrict the right to vote, id., at 433 434. The different ways in which Indianas law affects different voters are no more than different impacts of the single burden that the law uniformly imposes on all voters: To vote in person, everyone must have and present a photo identification that can be obtained for free. This is a generally applicable, nondiscriminatory voting regulation. The laws universally applicable requirements are eminently reasonable because the burden of acquiring, possessing, and showing a free photo identification is not a significant increase over the usual voting burdens, and the States stated interests are sufficient to sustain that minimal burden.
... the inconvenience of going to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, gathering required documents, and posing for a photograph does not qualify as a substantial burden on most voters right to vote, or represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting. The severity of the somewhat heavier burden that may be placed on a limited number of personse.g., elderly persons born out-of-state, who may have difficulty obtaining a birth certificateis mitigated by the fact that eligible voters without photo identification may cast provisional ballots that will be counted if they execute the required affidavit at the circuit court clerks office. Even assuming that the burden may not be justified as to a few voters, that conclusion is by no means sufficient to establish petitioners right to the relief they seek.
Petitioners bear a heavy burden of persuasion in seeking to invalidate SEA 483 in all its applications.
They RECOMMEND that they bring a ID for when the police harass them and the Right spins it to mean no one will be allowed to protest without an ID, as if there would be someone there to check IDs.Here is the text of one of the flyers used by the NAACP, to inform marchers...
![]()
...according to the OP.
With special attention to the last bullet point on the flyer.
And the evidence continues to mount that ignorance and stupidity are prerequisites for being conservative.Why even the NAACP requires photo ids to protest Voter Photo IDS !! Come ON!!!
There is a Constitutional right to vote, where unwarranted photo ID laws are un-Constitutional; but the Constitution doesnt apply to private organizations that are at liberty to enact whatever rules they wish. Consequently the NAACP is being neither racist nor inconsistent.
Just like that other rightwing nitwit Stephanie, youve committed a false comparison fallacy, and the premise of your thread fails accordingly
Doesn't matter... it's all good, clean fun."...They RECOMMEND that they bring a ID for when the police harass them and the Right spins it to mean no one will be allowed to protest without an ID, as if there would be someone there to check IDs..."
They RECOMMEND that they bring a ID for when the police harass them and the Right spins it to mean no one will be allowed to protest without an ID, as if there would be someone there to check IDs.Here is the text of one of the flyers used by the NAACP, to inform marchers...
![]()
...according to the OP.
With special attention to the last bullet point on the flyer.![]()