Why is advocating for Men's Rights considered unacceptable in Modern Western World?

I support the lesser of two evils, Canada Karen. At least Iā€™m not so pathetic that I spend my days whining about Canadaā€™s fucked up government.

No, you support the fascist, authoritarian, anti-democratic, racist and misogynistic Republican Party of Donald J Trump. Do you support the election of a criminal common with an avowed purpose of destroying the American constitution.

Thatā€™s not the lesser of two evils, thatā€™s the epitome of everything your founders feared would happen to the republic.
 
It is generally acknowledged in not only our own country, but throughout the Western World that, even in our own century, men enjoy a status, both contemporary and historical, above that of women.

While men do suffer from occasional injustices is true, but no one can argue that women continue to contend with more

It would be a magnanimous offer on thr part of men to acknowledge that and not make too big a fuss about those slights which we, as men, OCCASIONALLY endure.

And who does most of the work? Built nations? Fought wars? Designed things that evolved our species like engines, electricity, modern medicine? Aerospace? Air travel? The internet?

Even the queen of England with all her power and glory may have said to make some things happen, but that's all she did was say go do something and it was the men that made it all happen.

Even today women still want more for not having to do more. Usa women's soccer team constantly complains they don't make as much as men. But womens soccer doesn't make as much money as men but they still want to be paid like men for doing less. They also ignore that if the women's team loses and the men's team wins the women's team gets a cut of the men's team winnings. Even if they lose, they still take the men's money.

I know you've watched a lot of Fraiser and trying to wow us with your witty and savvy dialogue and your self assured insight into the topic at hand but it's all for naught. You're not interested in some self insisting idea about men and women without looking at the reality of things.
 
No, you support the fascist, authoritarian, anti-democratic, racist and misogynistic Republican Party of Donald J Trump. Do you support the election of a criminal common with an avowed purpose of destroying the American constitution.

Thatā€™s not the lesser of two evils, thatā€™s the epitome of everything your founders feared would happen to the republic.
Telling me ā€œwhat I supportā€ is a tacit admission that you really donā€™t know shit and can only argue with your own straw men, dunt.
 
And who does most of the work? Built nations? Fought wars? Designed things that evolved our species like engines, electricity, modern medicine? Aerospace? Air travel? The internet?

Even the queen of England with all her power and glory may have said to make some things happen, but that's all she did was say go do something and it was the men that made it all happen.

Even today women still want more for not having to do more. Usa women's soccer team constantly complains they don't make as much as men. But womens soccer doesn't make as much money as men but they still want to be paid like men for doing less. They also ignore that if the women's team loses and the men's team wins the women's team gets a cut of the men's team winnings. Even if they lose, they still take the men's money.

I know you've watched a lot of Fraiser and trying to wow us with your witty and savvy dialogue and your self assured insight into the topic at hand but it's all for naught. You're not interested in some self insisting idea about men and women without looking at the reality of things.

And who does most of the work? Define work. Given that it was only in the past century that women were even admitted to most universities or institutions of higher learning, how exactly were women to learn the science, technology, mathematics, and skills.

Those women like Madame Curie, and Joan of Arc, Queen Elizabeth I, and others, who persevered and obtained an education, distinguished themselves in ways that are still logged into this date.

As well, you seem to think that cooking cleaning, bearing children, and raising a family before the advent of modern appliances, or electricity, was a walk in the park. Weaving, spinning, making clothing, and keeping a kitchen garden and preserving food for winter are a lot of work. Mass manufacturing wasnā€™t available to ease their work. Laundry was done by hand. As was weaving, spinning and sewing.

Nobody accomplishes anything when their basic needs for food, shelter and clothing arenā€™t being met.

You also say ā€œfought warsā€ like it was a good thing. Started wars is what they did. Imagine where the human race would be, if not for all of the time, money and effort and brain power wasted, blowing shit up in other countries.

Imagine if the USA had spent all of the money wasted on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, on upgrading your infrastructure, education and healthcare at home.
 
Telling me ā€œwhat I supportā€ is a tacit admission that you really donā€™t know shit and can only argue with your own straw men, dunt.

If youā€™re voting Republican, thatā€™s what youā€™re supporting. Whether you personally believe in that shit is irrelevant, youā€™re still supporting it.
 
What rights are denied to white men?
Their kids are normally taken from them in a divorce, even if they are excellent fathers.
They can have their lives and careers destroyed by a rape accusation, even if it's eventually proven false.
They can be physically assaulted by a woman with few or no consequences for her. In fact, they get mocked if they admit she assaulted them, much less press charges.
They are more likely to commit suicide than women are.
They work harder, more dangerous jobs than women do, yet get complaints because they make more money doing it than women, who work less dangerous jobs. How many women do you see welding steel on a high-rise office building?
They are sent to die on the battlefield far more often than women are. Where are the women demanding they be sent to the front lines?
They are more often homeless than women are.
If they have sex with a woman and she gets pregnant, she gains control over their reproductive freedom, as she can either deny them fatherhood or force it on them against their will.

You may deny that those are rights but bring them up in virtually any public sphere today and watch the reactions. There are a lot of ways men, even white men, are disadvantaged.
 
If youā€™re voting Republican, thatā€™s what youā€™re supporting. Whether you personally believe in that shit is irrelevant, youā€™re still supporting it.
The only shit thatā€™s irrelevant here is the opinions of a foreign dunt with a substandard IQ, Canada Karen.
 
Last edited:
And who does most of the work? Define work. Given that it was only in the past century that women were even admitted to most universities or institutions of higher learning, how exactly were women to learn the science, technology, mathematics, and skills.
When we see women in equal numbers to men welding steel in high-rise buildings, carrying cement and laying bricks, spreading hot tar on roads in August, maintaining major cities' sewer systems by climbing down into the tunnels, we'll agree that they're sharing the burden of work equally.
Those women like Madame Curie, and Joan of Arc, Queen Elizabeth I, and others, who persevered and obtained an education, distinguished themselves in ways that are still logged into this date.
No one is saying women are incapable of great exploits. You do know, though, that the big push to get women into the work force was to expand the tax base, right? And we're still waiting for woman to beat down the doors to all those high paying construction jobs.
As well, you seem to think that cooking cleaning, bearing children, and raising a family before the advent of modern appliances, or electricity, was a walk in the park. Weaving, spinning, making clothing, and keeping a kitchen garden and preserving food for winter are a lot of work. Mass manufacturing wasnā€™t available to ease their work. Laundry was done by hand. As was weaving, spinning and sewing.
There is a reason why it was considered "women's work" to do those things, and that is because you normally would not die while doing them. Trying to kill a Saber-tooth with a stick or a rock so it would not eat your children or livestock, OTOH, was likely to end your life prematurely. In modern life, however, what does the average homemaker have to do?

Wash dishes? Load the dishwasher and press a button.
Wash clothes? Load the washer and press a button. After a while, put them in the dryer and press another button.
Sweep? Pull out the vacuum cleaner and be done in a half hour.
Dust? Get out the duster and wipe stuff off.
Take care of the kids? Stash them in the car and take them places where somebody else will watch them for an hour or two and wear them out.
Make clothes? Don't make me laugh. Go online and order some.

I've done those things and they are easy to do. They're not even mentally difficult.
Nobody accomplishes anything when their basic needs for food, shelter and clothing arenā€™t being met.

You also say ā€œfought warsā€ like it was a good thing. Started wars is what they did. Imagine where the human race would be, if not for all of the time, money and effort and brain power wasted, blowing shit up in other countries.

Imagine if the USA had spent all of the money wasted on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, on upgrading your infrastructure, education and healthcare at home.
Pretending that there wouldn't have been any wars if the women were in charge is laughable. A tribe will defend itself, whether it's led by a woman or a man. And yes, when women die on the battlefield in the same numbers as men, we'll accept that they're going for real equality. Until then, and until we see them in dangerous and physically demanding careers in the same numbers as men are, they're not really going for equality, they just want to cherry pick the areas they want to be in by force.
 
If youā€™re voting Republican, thatā€™s what youā€™re supporting. Whether you personally believe in that shit is irrelevant, youā€™re still supporting it.
And you think the Communist DemocRAT party is clean and pure? They are the ones who support all sorts of sexual deviancy including but not limited to child molesters.
 
If youā€™re voting Republican, thatā€™s what youā€™re supporting. Whether you personally believe in that shit is irrelevant, youā€™re still supporting it.
Actually, we checked, and if you vote Republican, the country you save just might be your own.
 
Child custody cases. It's not as bad as it once was, but it's still pretty bad. A father starts out with 2 strikes against him the first time he steps into the courtroom.

Not when drugs or any kind of child abuse is involved. In most cases, the children are better off with the mother but I do otherwise agree with you.
 
Child custody cases. It's not as bad as it once was, but it's still pretty bad. A father starts out with 2 strikes against him the first time he steps into the courtroom.
Reproductive freedom. A woman's is absolute. She can neither be forced to become a mother or be denied motherhood through any legal choice of the father. A man, OTOH, can legally be forced into financial servitude for 18 years or denied fatherhood on the desire of the woman.
 
And you think the Communist DemocRAT party is clean and pure? They are the ones who support all sorts of sexual deviancy including but not limited to child molesters.

You post is a lie from start to finish. Calling the party ā€œDemocRATsā€ shows you to be a brainwashed partisan shill.

The Democrats are not communists or anything that even resembles communism.

Nor do they support sexual ā€œdeviancyā€. Homosexuality is not ā€œdeviancyā€. It is normal sexual behaviour for a small subset of the all human populations since the dawn of time.
 
Reproductive freedom. A woman's is absolute. She can neither be forced to become a mother or be denied motherhood through any legal choice of the father. A man, OTOH, can legally be forced into financial servitude for 18 years or denied fatherhood on the desire of the woman.

No, he can keep it in his pants. Or he can use a condom. He has lots of options that donā€™t involve taking those risks.
 
Men's rights? Democrats voted to let young women be battered and beaten in sports by men in dresses. Young girls are forced to share locker rooms with confused boys. Before we think about men's or women's rights we have to acknowledge that there is a difference between men and women.

There are fewer than 100 trans athletes, male and female, in the NCAA. Women are not being beaten by trans athletes at all nor are they in locker rooms. These are lies the Republicans tell you.
 
And who does most of the work? Define work. Given that it was only in the past century that women were even admitted to most universities or institutions of higher learning, how exactly were women to learn the science, technology, mathematics, and skills.

Those women like Madame Curie, and Joan of Arc, Queen Elizabeth I, and others, who persevered and obtained an education, distinguished themselves in ways that are still logged into this date.

As well, you seem to think that cooking cleaning, bearing children, and raising a family before the advent of modern appliances, or electricity, was a walk in the park. Weaving, spinning, making clothing, and keeping a kitchen garden and preserving food for winter are a lot of work. Mass manufacturing wasnā€™t available to ease their work. Laundry was done by hand. As was weaving, spinning and sewing.

Nobody accomplishes anything when their basic needs for food, shelter and clothing arenā€™t being met.

You also say ā€œfought warsā€ like it was a good thing. Started wars is what they did. Imagine where the human race would be, if not for all of the time, money and effort and brain power wasted, blowing shit up in other countries.

Imagine if the USA had spent all of the money wasted on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, on upgrading your infrastructure, education and healthcare at home.
The era of convenience was a long time a coming. Let's face it. Life is 80 years or so. And most ladies in marriages did not have it bad at the peak of our civilization around 1970. Now, there were divorces or deaths of spouses or women that never would marry for any reason. Homemakers had important jobs. And they did that work and controlled the neighborhoods and streets also. Today we have specialists who get paid for all of that while mom is working somewhere. Then mom comes home to work some more. And many are not as good as what was done in the past. In that era, they smoked, drank lots of coffee, read many newspapers and sensationalist magazines, watched endless TV soaps and talk shows while doing the housework needed. At night they even may have ordered fast food after dinner. What happened with feminism has cause our nation to do a slow stall. Growth has slowed down, inflation picked up, wages are more stagnant. This is truth.
 
There are fewer than 100 trans athletes, male and female, in the NCAA. Women are not being beaten by trans athletes at all nor are they in locker rooms. These are lies the Republicans tell you.
I have seen a couple of MMA fights where a dude beat the unholy shit out of a woman. Doesn't happen? Yeah, its happening. The 100 figure you pulled out of your ass is ridiculous as well.
 
Woman doesnā€™t become a ā€œmotherā€ until the child is born. The misogynistic practice of slut, shaming women, who become pregnant, and threatening to prosecute them for terminating their pregnancies, is both against biblical teachings and common sense.

Already Republicans are seeking to criminalize women leaving their state to go to a jurisdiction, where abortion is legal and obtain a legal abortion there. Wash, rinse and repeat for gender, affirming care.

This notion of assigning a clump of cells, more rights than the woman, carrying it, is insanity on the hoof.

And the idea that the woman escapes responsibility, simply by dropping the child off at the police station, completely ignores the risk to her life and carrying the baby to term and giving birth to it in the first place. By this time sheā€™s lost income from being unable to work, sheā€™s had to buy a whole new wardrobe, because none of her clothes fit her, and sheā€™s having medical checkups monthly, as well as the cost of co-pays for confinement and delivery.


Men in these threads consistently talk about getting pregnant and having a baby is if itā€™s ā€œno big dealā€. It is physically the most difficult thing Iā€™ve ever done. Your body and your health are never the same after having children.

For American women, maternal mortality and childbirth numbers are right off the charts. The states with the most restrictive abortion law already had the high rates of maternal death in pregnancy and childbirth but theyā€™ve increased by 69% in these states which have the now have the most mrestrictive abortion bans.
figures the whore of babylon wouldnt know when a women becomes a mother,,,

if you want the child youre a mother at conception but if you want to kill it its a clump of cells,,

funny how you baby killers are always trying to tell the world what science says when it fits your narrative,,

which name do you like better,, the whore of babylon or 5 dollar foot long??

saying a worn out 5 dollar canadian street whore just takes to long to type,, and you arent worth the time,,
 
Reproductive freedom. A woman's is absolute. She can neither be forced to become a mother or be denied motherhood through any legal choice of the father. A man, OTOH, can legally be forced into financial servitude for 18 years or denied fatherhood on the desire of the woman.
Can't go along with you there. A woman has a right to decide what she does with her own body.
 

Forum List

Back
Top