Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?

[Pop23]

I work hard to keep family out of it. I'd appreciate the same in return. I'm not bringing up my wife, you are

Okay- I will do so- sorry.

You just consider both parties to the marriage to be government sponsored prostitutes?

We are good.

And I never said anyone was a prostitute. You did. How do prostitutes hire each other? I don't even get how you think that makes sense

According to you marriage is all about the government paying married couples for sex- prostitutes get paid for sex- the government is paying both of them for sex, hence both are prostitutes.

Or maybe porn actors.

I mean logically following your odd point of view that marriage is all about the government paying couples to have sex.

Isn't that the entire reason this is before the courts? Financial benefit?

Was this heterosexuals that brought the case? No?
!

No.

No.

Opinions noted

 

[RKMBrown]

Okay- I will do so- sorry.

You just consider both parties to the marriage to be government sponsored prostitutes?

We are good.

And I never said anyone was a prostitute. You did. How do prostitutes hire each other? I don't even get how you think that makes sense

According to you marriage is all about the government paying married couples for sex- prostitutes get paid for sex- the government is paying both of them for sex, hence both are prostitutes.

Or maybe porn actors.

I mean logically following your odd point of view that marriage is all about the government paying couples to have sex.

Isn't that the entire reason this is before the courts? Financial benefit?

Was this heterosexuals that brought the case? No?

You seem confused.

As Kaz has rightly stated, he is responsible for more children being born than all same sex coupling in the history of the world.

That's actually kinda awesome when you think of it!

That's actually very awesome when you think of it!!

No, asshole, marriage is not about financial benefit. Well, maybe it was for you and your wife, but you don't speak for anyone else.

I'm sorry dude, mine is mine, I never went to court claiming I was somehow damaged.

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

 

[Pop23]

We are good.

And I never said anyone was a prostitute. You did. How do prostitutes hire each other? I don't even get how you think that makes sense

According to you marriage is all about the government paying married couples for sex- prostitutes get paid for sex- the government is paying both of them for sex, hence both are prostitutes.

Or maybe porn actors.

I mean logically following your odd point of view that marriage is all about the government paying couples to have sex.

Isn't that the entire reason this is before the courts? Financial benefit?

Was this heterosexuals that brought the case? No?

You seem confused.

As Kaz has rightly stated, he is responsible for more children being born than all same sex coupling in the history of the world.

That's actually kinda awesome when you think of it!

That's actually very awesome when you think of it!!

No, asshole, marriage is not about financial benefit. Well, maybe it was for you and your wife, but you don't speak for anyone else.

I'm sorry dude, mine is mine, I never went to court claiming I was somehow damaged.

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

 

[RKMBrown]

According to you marriage is all about the government paying married couples for sex- prostitutes get paid for sex- the government is paying both of them for sex, hence both are prostitutes.

Or maybe porn actors.

I mean logically following your odd point of view that marriage is all about the government paying couples to have sex.

Isn't that the entire reason this is before the courts? Financial benefit?

Was this heterosexuals that brought the case? No?

You seem confused.

As Kaz has rightly stated, he is responsible for more children being born than all same sex coupling in the history of the world.

That's actually kinda awesome when you think of it!

That's actually very awesome when you think of it!!

No, asshole, marriage is not about financial benefit. Well, maybe it was for you and your wife, but you don't speak for anyone else.

I'm sorry dude, mine is mine, I never went to court claiming I was somehow damaged.

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

 

[Pop23]

Isn't that the entire reason this is before the courts? Financial benefit?

Was this heterosexuals that brought the case? No?

You seem confused.

As Kaz has rightly stated, he is responsible for more children being born than all same sex coupling in the history of the world.

That's actually kinda awesome when you think of it!

That's actually very awesome when you think of it!!

No, asshole, marriage is not about financial benefit. Well, maybe it was for you and your wife, but you don't speak for anyone else.

I'm sorry dude, mine is mine, I never went to court claiming I was somehow damaged.

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

 

[Pop23]

No, asshole, marriage is not about financial benefit. Well, maybe it was for you and your wife, but you don't speak for anyone else.

I'm sorry dude, mine is mine, I never went to court claiming I was somehow damaged.

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

 

[RKMBrown]

I'm sorry dude, mine is mine, I never went to court claiming I was somehow damaged.

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

Are you trying to jack me off?

 

[Pop23]

Why would you have to go to court throw out an unconstitutional marriage ban against you and your family? I thought you said you were hetero and not trying to marry your brother.

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

Are you trying to jack me off?

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

 

[RKMBrown]

Read dude read.

I know you're challenged, maybe get some glasses or get someone to read it aloud to you.

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

Are you trying to jack me off?

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

 

[Pop23]

I already read, and already have glasses thx for the suggestion. What does my reading have to do with your inability to answer even basic questions?

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

Are you trying to jack me off?

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

 

[RKMBrown]

What question? Ohhhhh, the stoopid one?

No, I'll let you just sink further in your delusions.

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

Are you trying to jack me off?

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

Dude get your tongue off my dick and answer the question.

 

[Pop23]

But here's a clue. The ones all pissed off about not be included in marriage are the ones that willingly opted out.

I did not opt out.

Are you trying to jack me off?

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

Dude get your tongue off my dick and answer the question.

Your homosexual fantasies are both amusing and creepy

 

[Pop23]

Are you trying to jack me off?

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

Dude get your tongue off my dick and answer the question.

Your homosexual fantasies are both amusing and creepy

And if the question is what I think it is, the answer is, yes, yours is likely way smaller than average.

 

[RKMBrown]

Why? Cruising USMB? I'm not interested.

Is there nothing you can handle yourself?

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

Dude get your tongue off my dick and answer the question.

Your homosexual fantasies are both amusing and creepy

And if the question is what I think it is, the answer is, yes, yours is likely way smaller than average.

How many have you licked?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I wonder if the fuckwit who started this thread realizes that the definition of 'mating', the term he uses in the thread title, i.e., 'gay mating' means:

1. mating - the act of pairing a male and female for reproductive purposes

lol, of course he doesn't. That is one of a zillion characteristics he exhibits that earn him the title of 'fuckwit'.

 

[Pop23]

Then get your hand off my dick and answer the questions.

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

Dude get your tongue off my dick and answer the question.

Your homosexual fantasies are both amusing and creepy

And if the question is what I think it is, the answer is, yes, yours is likely way smaller than average.

How many have you licked?

^^^^ creepy troll alert ^^^^

 

[RKMBrown]

Wishful thinking? But like I said, I ain't interested big fella

Dude get your tongue off my dick and answer the question.

Your homosexual fantasies are both amusing and creepy

And if the question is what I think it is, the answer is, yes, yours is likely way smaller than average.

How many have you licked?

^^^^ creepy troll alert ^^^^

Irony alert^^^

 

[GreenBean]

You have shown no hint of 'scientific objectivity' in any of your anti-gay rants.

You have no idea what you are talking about, but of course that is self evident to anyone who has ever conversed with you on this forum or elsewhere. You are a simpleton of the worst kind , an idiot who is too simple minded to realize that he is an idiot.

Here's a wager for you faggot - show me a factual post - any post I ever made on this forum pertaining to homosexuality that is not in some way based on scientifically proven or plausible theories and I will disappear - never to post here again - - you can't do it - there are none dumbass.

 

[GreenBean]

your desire to promote discrimination against them.

I guess that's why I do not oppose Gay Marriage -

 

[GreenBean]

Of course there are far more opposite couples than same sex couples, the numbers would have to be much larger since the disparity is 96% to 4%.

Statistics are normally done by percentage in any case, so if you have a point, do so in a relevent basis.

You're right...there is no point to this ridiculous discussion. There are far, far (by the hundreds of thousands) more "subsidized" straight married couples not having kids than there are gay "subsidized" married couples.

Looks like you're catching on to how silly anti gay bigots arguments are...and how easily they fail.

Actually what you are proving is that you are a gay Nazi

FemiNazi - the 60s feminists and their current avatars are excretions of lesbianism.

LOL.....its like you live to parrot Rush Limbaugh.

Good to know you hate all women as much as you hate homosexuals.

Attacking the source is two things. First, it's a logical fallacy. Second, it says you have nothing

I've read this thread from post one - he hasn't come out with anything of substance yet- I doubt he's capable of it ----in fact the only poster I see here from the queer camp that has any shred of intelligence is seawytch - but she's shivering in her skivvies from some of the previous thumpings she's been subjected to.

Hey Queers - Is this he best you can do ??!! Half wits and simpletons .... lol