edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
IOW, the case was thrown out and not brought up again in the proper jurisdiction, which would have been easy to do if they were so sure "shall" meant "shall."Once again, > When DACA was challenged by members of an ICE public sector union in 2012, the Obama DOJ attempted to argue that “shall” in the above section actually meant “may.” Showing a respect for the English language, the judge in that case ruled that “shall” really did mean “shall” and would have struck down DACA but for jurisdictional problems. Were you of the notion that judges always make correct judgements, and never make faulty if not idiotic) ones ?thank you for confirming that the case was thrown out, and never brought back.
BUT THEY DIDN'T, obviously because they were sure they would lose, which is why they brought it up in a court where they they knew they lacked standing in the first place!!!!!