Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,239
- 54,642
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #81
Google it lowlife.Uh-huh. Then tell us about these 'military tribunals' that Michael Flynn is supposedly going to run.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Google it lowlife.Uh-huh. Then tell us about these 'military tribunals' that Michael Flynn is supposedly going to run.
I said "help" not "run". Do I sound like a politician? You sound like a troll.The ones that Lastamender said that Michael Flynn could help with in this post:
View attachment 971794
I said "help" not "run". Do I sound like a politician? You sound like a troll.
Google it lowlife.
T%he ones with any luck could happen. That is all you need for an answer. Now go troll someone else.You sound like someone talking about 'military tribunals' in the near future. But being very evasive about them.
What military tribunals are you referring to?
Military tribunals have happened. Google will tell you all about them.Google something that hasn't happened yet?
That's not how google works. You're the one imagining these 'military tribunals'. Tell us about them. Who would be tried at them? For what? Backed with what evidence?
And why the liar Michael Flynn to 'help' with them?
Espionage.Court martialed on what charges, backed with what evidence?
Military tribunals have happened. Google will tell you all about them.
Espionage.
LtCol Vindman claimed he was a whistleblower.So anyone who would ever blow a whistle on the Trump presidency should be removed, huh?
And presumably court martialed? I'm still trying to figure out what these 'military tribunals' are supposed to be about.
No evasion. There is no point in answering you.So more evasion. What about the 'military tribunals' that Michael Flynn could help at do you not want to tell us.
You're clearly not referring to past 'military tribunals', but future ones.
So who is being tried at these 'military tribunals'. For what? Based on what evidence?
Says who?LtCol Vindman claimed he was a whistleblower.
What he did was commit espionage and treason.
The only reason they protected him was because he helped the Deep State spy on Trump
Vindman's own testimony in front of congress.Who, with what evidence?
Remembering of course that you'll need far more than accusations and allegations.
And the evidence?Espionage.
No evasion. There is no point in answering you.
Vindman conspired with Adam Schiff and the Democrats to spy on the President Of The United States.Says who?
No military tribunal has ever found this to be true. He's never been charged with any such crime. Under Trump or anyone else.
So are you expecting military tribunals to occur because YOU say a crime occured?
Who is 'they'? You're using a conspiracy to explain the failure of a conspiracy.
Voter ID would do that with far less bloodshedTribunals will not end the Constitutional Republic, they will uphold it.
Guess we're just going to have to find out. Won't we?Nothing but evasion. As you're still avoiding the question:
What 'military tribunals' are you referring to that Michael Flynn can 'help' with?
Tribunals charging who, with what, backed with what evidence?
They kept Trump's crime quiet. I think I will do the same.Nothing but evasion. As you're still avoiding the question:
What 'military tribunals' are you referring to that Michael Flynn can 'help' with?
Tribunals charging who, with what, backed with what evidence?
Vindman's own testimony in front of congress.
He was sworn to follow the constitution and obey the lawful orders of his Commander in Chief.
Adam Schiff worked with him to spy on the president.
During war they shoot people for that.
General Miley went to the CCP behind Trump's back.
He should be charged with espionage and treason.