Gen. Michael Flynn as his Vice President. “Trump-Flynn 2024”

[MagicMike]

Trump isn't a convicted felon yet.

The judge has put off sentencing......and Trump cannot appeal until he's sentenced......so technically he's not a felon.

Nope.
He's a felon.

 

[Skylar]

Guess we're just going to have to find out. Won't we?

Shitforbrains.

Y'all are the one with military tribunal and execution fantasies. I'm asking you to provide a window into the wasteland of the MAGA mindset by telling us about your imaginary 'military tribunals', and who you'd inflict them upon.

And you're doing a wonderful job!

 

[BULLDOG]

No evasion. There is no point in answering you.

Coward. Ask Hannity for help on responding.

 

[Skylar]

They kept Trump's crime quiet. I think I will do the same.

Laughing....your predictions and 'evidence' are always so compelling and irrefutable.....until someone actually asks to see them.

And then disappear like a fart in the wind. So much for those 'military tribunals'!

I accept your surrender with all the grace and patience it deserves.

 

[Skylar]

Coward. Ask Hannity for help on responding.

Last is a hopeless regurgetator. You should see him in the Big Lie boards, polishing hapless turd after hapless turd.

This time is no different.

 

[Skylar]

Vindman conspired with Adam Schiff and the Democrats to spy on the President Of The United States.

Again, says who?

No military tribunal has ever found this to be true.

That's treason.

Treason is war against the United States. Its the only crime defined by the constitution. And nothing you've described remotely approaches that.

Which might explain the complete and total failure of your conspiracy with zero of any of the charges you've imagined by levied against anyone involved.

I don't give a God Damn if you like the result.

The result being....no charges, trials, tribunals or executions for anyone involved in your imagined 'treason'.

That's the proper outcome. Why wouldn't I like it? You seem a little upset, though.

Remember, you citing yourself isn't a legal standard. Its just your imagination.

 

[mudwhistle]

Again, says who?

No military tribunal has ever found this to be true.


Treason is war against the United States. Its the only crime defined by the constitution. And nothing you've described remotely approaches that.

Which might explain the complete and total failure of your conspiracy with zero of any of the charges you've imagined by levied against anyone involved.


The result being....no charges, trials, tribunals or executions for anyone involved in your imagined 'treason'.

That's the proper outcome. Why wouldn't I like it? You seem a little upset, though.

Remember, you citing yourself isn't a legal standard. Its just your imagination.

 

[mudwhistle]

Last is a hopeless regurgetator. You should see him in the Big Lie boards, polishing hapless turd after hapless turd.

This time is no different.

 

[Skylar]

View attachment 971928

So.....its you, citing yourself as legal authority, insisting that people should be subject to military tribunals because you says so.

Good luck with that.

 

[mudwhistle]

And what lawful order did he not follow according to the US military?




Says who?




Your desire for the death penalty is well noted.




What state secrets did Miley reveal, and what war did he wage against the United States?

 

[Skylar]

View attachment 971931

I'm guessing they don't ask my questions of you in your echo chamber. Because you don't have any good answers for the obvious questions outside of it.

Nothing you've described about Vindman is treason or anything remotely like it. Treason is the only crime defined by the United States, and its war against the United States.

Do you think the disconnect between your imagination and actual legal outcomes is that you don't know how the law actually works?

 

[mudwhistle]

So.....its you, citing yourself as legal authority, insisting that people should be subject to military tribunals because you says so.

Good luck with that.

espionage​

​

It's no secret: espionage is the act of organized spying, usually with the goal of uncovering sensitive military or political information.


If the government has relocated you to a foreign country, made you change your name, given you a fake mustache to wear, and instructed you to hide in a closet at the presidential palace and report back weekly on what you overhear, then you are engaging in espionage. This noun is similar to snooping, but generally applies to much more serious situations, like when countries or businesses spy on each other to try to obtain top secret information.

All you have to do is read the UCMJ.

10 U.S. Code § 881 - Art. 81. Conspiracy​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next
(a)
Any person subject to this chapter who conspires with any other person to commit an offense under this chapter shall, if one or more of the conspirators does an act to effect the object of the conspiracy, be punished as a court-martial may direct.
(b)
Any person subject to this chapter who conspires with any other person to commit an offense under the law of war, and who knowingly does an overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, shall be punished, if death results to one or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct, and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial or military commission may direct.

​

10 USC 894: Art. 94. Mutiny or seditionText contains those laws in effect on July 3, 2024
From Title 10-ARMED FORCESSubtitle A-General Military LawPART II-PERSONNELCHAPTER 47-UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICESUBCHAPTER X-PUNITIVE ARTICLES
Jump To: Source Credit

§894. Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition​

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who-

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;

(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.


(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68.)

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm guessing they don't ask my questions of you in your echo chamber. Because you don't have any good answers for the obvious questions outside of it.

Nothing you've described about Vindman is treason or anything remotely like it. Treason is the only crime defined by the United States, and its war against the United States.

Do you think the disconnect between your imagination and actual legal outcomes is that you don't know how the law actually works?

I have plenty of answers. You're just to stupid to acknowledge them.

I'm retired military.
I held a TS-SCI security clearance.

I know the laws against espionage and conspiracy to commit an illegal act of sedition.

LtCol Vindman conspired with Adam Schiff to spy on the President of The United States, which BTW carries the Death Penalty.


All the Jan 6th rioters did was destroy property and fight with police. They've been in jail for over 3 years now.

This is much worse offenses than anything they did on Jan 6th.

But apparently some people who are involved in criminal conspiracies with Democrats get a free pass.

 

[Skylar]

espionage​

​

It's no secret: espionage is the act of organized spying, usually with the goal of uncovering sensitive military or political information.


If the government has relocated you to a foreign country, made you change your name, given you a fake mustache to wear, and instructed you to hide in a closet at the presidential palace and report back weekly on what you overhear, then you are engaging in espionage. This noun is similar to snooping, but generally applies to much more serious situations, like when countries or businesses spy on each other to try to obtain top secret information.

All you have to do is read the UCMJ.

10 U.S. Code § 881 - Art. 81. Conspiracy​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next
(a)
Any person subject to this chapter who conspires with any other person to commit an offense under this chapter shall, if one or more of the conspirators does an act to effect the object of the conspiracy, be punished as a court-martial may direct.
(b)
Any person subject to this chapter who conspires with any other person to commit an offense under the law of war, and who knowingly does an overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, shall be punished, if death results to one or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct, and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial or military commission may direct.

​

10 USC 894: Art. 94. Mutiny or seditionText contains those laws in effect on July 3, 2024
From Title 10-ARMED FORCESSubtitle A-General Military LawPART II-PERSONNELCHAPTER 47-UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICESUBCHAPTER X-PUNITIVE ARTICLES
Jump To: Source Credit

§894. Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition​

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who-

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;

(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.


(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68.)

And where is the treason you were claiming? And what lawful order did Vindman not follow?

 

[Skylar]

I know the laws against espionage and conspiracy to commit an illegal act of sedition.

LtCol Vindman conspired with Adam Schiff to spy on the President of The United States, which BTW carries the Death Penalty.

You're citing yourself as a legal expert on espionage and conspiracy to commit an illegal act of sedition?

You'll need to prove your credentials. You simply you're an expert is laughably insufficient.

Especially after you already accused Vindman of TREASON and are now backpedalling badly, omitting any mention of it in your latest round of accusations.

Kind of major change to your allegations, is it not? You've rather elegantly disproven your own expertise by making an legal accusations you can't possibly back up. And then frantically trying to abandon it.

 

[Skylar]

LtCol Vindman conspired with Adam Schiff to spy on the President of The United States, which BTW carries the Death Penalty.

And do you think Trump should have Vindman and Schiff arrested, tried and executed if re-elected?

We both know the answer. I just want you to demonstrate your insanity for the thread.

 

[Burgermeister]

Day one - Fire Wray, appoint Flynn as Director of the FBI. Let him prosecute Wray for treason.

 

[Skylar]

Day one - Fire Wray, appoint Flynn as Director of the FBI. Let him prosecute Wray for treason.

Treason again, huh? Y'all keep using it as a catch all. Its very specific crime, the only one defined by the constitution: war against the United States.

Why would Wray be charged with waging war against the US?

 

[Burgermeister]

Treason again, huh? Y'all keep using it as a catch all. Its very specific crime, the only one defined by the constitution: war against the United States.

Why would Wray be charged with waging war against the US?

Conspired to take down a sitting President with the false Steele dossier. Include Hillary.

WASHINGTON – Years before it paid the rumor peddler at the center of the debunked anti-Trump dossier, the FBI considered him a counterintelligence threat. Payments from the FBI to Igor Danchenko, the dossier’s primary sub-source, continued from March 2017 to October 2020 despite his problematic history and ongoing congressional investigations into the FBI’s years-long Russia probe codenamed Crossfire Hurricane.

Since 2016, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and others have raised a number of concerns about Crossfire Hurricane given its reliance on unverified – and now debunked – allegations from dubious sources who were paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign and Democratic National Committee. That information was central to securing a federal warrant to eavesdrop on a member of the Trump presidential campaign in 2016 and 2017. At the time the FBI was paying Danchenko, it was aware of his history, including his interactions with Russian intelligence services and his offer to procure and sell U.S. government secrets.

“This extraordinary fact pattern requires additional information from the Justice Department and FBI relating to why Danchenko was placed on the payroll and paid by the taxpayer to assist in the federal government’s flawed investigation into President Trump,” Grassley and Johnson wrote to Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Debunked Anti-Trump Dossier Sub-Source Who Sought to Traffic Classified Information Remained on FBI Payroll until late 2020 | U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa

WASHINGTON – Years before it paid the rumor peddler at the center of the debunked anti-Trump...

www.grassley.senate.gov

 

[Skylar]

Conspired to take down a sitting President with the false Steele dossier. Include Hillary.

WASHINGTON – Years before it paid the rumor peddler at the center of the debunked anti-Trump dossier, the FBI considered him a counterintelligence threat. Payments from the FBI to Igor Danchenko, the dossier’s primary sub-source, continued from March 2017 to October 2020 despite his problematic history and ongoing congressional investigations into the FBI’s years-long Russia probe codenamed Crossfire Hurricane.

Since 2016, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and others have raised a number of concerns about Crossfire Hurricane given its reliance on unverified – and now debunked – allegations from dubious sources who were paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign and Democratic National Committee. That information was central to securing a federal warrant to eavesdrop on a member of the Trump presidential campaign in 2016 and 2017. At the time the FBI was paying Danchenko, it was aware of his history, including his interactions with Russian intelligence services and his offer to procure and sell U.S. government secrets.

“This extraordinary fact pattern requires additional information from the Justice Department and FBI relating to why Danchenko was placed on the payroll and paid by the taxpayer to assist in the federal government’s flawed investigation into President Trump,” Grassley and Johnson wrote to Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Debunked Anti-Trump Dossier Sub-Source Who Sought to Traffic Classified Information Remained on FBI Payroll until late 2020 | U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa

WASHINGTON – Years before it paid the rumor peddler at the center of the debunked anti-Trump...

www.grassley.senate.gov

So the FBI making payments to a source is 'war against the United States'?

They don't ask many questions of your legal theories in the echo chamber, do they?