Why the CIA Does NOT Know Who Hacked the DNC

In all likelihood if this was done by a foreign state, they used an onion routing server farm that stripped all the OCI header and footer information as it bounced around the intranet the onion routers used, and thus there was nothing left to identify the bits that made up the package.

Some reading if you are truly interested.

OSI model - Wikipedia

Darknet - Wikipedia

Onion routing - Wikipedia

Lol. Yes. How dare it be pointed out that he orange sociopath is a Russian plant.

It's not like his appointments show that at all. Lol
 
Lol. Yes. How dare it be pointed out that he orange sociopath is a Russian plant.

It's not like his appointments show that at all. Lol

upload_2016-12-13_17-6-3.png
 
The office overseeing all 17 agencies of the US intelligence community apparently doubts the CIA’s assessment that Russia intervened to help Donald Trump win the presidential election, as Reuters reports anonymous officials saying the allegation won’t be endorsed.

Three unnamed officials from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) told Reuters on Monday that their agency does not dispute the CIA’s findings, yet it would not accept them either.

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," one of the officials told the news agency. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.”

Top US spy agency abstains on CIA assessment of Russian hack of 2016 election
Yeah they can't prove if the hacks were intended to hurt Hillary after her election, or hurt Hillary by costing her the election.

Therefore, according to Trump, the Russians were not involved in any hacking :rolleyes:

Ya forgot to subtract the 5 million non-citizen and other fraudulent votes for HRC, asswipe.
Judicial Review Was Obiter Dictum. Therefore, It Was Non-Binding

Don't forget the millions of anchor babies who voted for Hillarrhea. They all should be disenfranchised. We, the people, must take the Constitution back from SCROTUS. Granting a legal right obtained through illegal means is a contradiction and should call into question all the decisions of the unpatriotic blackrobed robbers who forced it upon us.
 
In all likelihood if this was done by a foreign state, they used an onion routing server farm that stripped all the OCI header and footer information as it bounced around the intranet the onion routers used, and thus there was nothing left to identify the bits that made up the package.

Some reading if you are truly interested.

OSI model - Wikipedia

Darknet - Wikipedia

Onion routing - Wikipedia
What precisely did they hack?????

Nobody has even bothered mentioning anything other than emails. We already know that had nothing to do with Russia. Hillary’s media just refuses to admit the truth. It has nothing to do with election day vote totals. They lump emails in with some imaginary fantasy about Russian hackers changing vote counts. After the recount blew up in their faces they're trying to delegitimize Trump's presidency with false innuendo.

It's telling that one of the loudest voices Whinging About The Hacked Election is John Podesta. The revelations from his sordid email record were some of the worst this election cycle. He's using this as a BIG SQUIRREL in order to distract attention from his lack of email security contributing so greatly to the Fall of The House of Clinton.

Keeping the stupid people stupid.

What they still haven't grasped is that it only works with their core true believers. Everybody else has figured it out. I think they thought there were more of them.
 
In all likelihood if this was done by a foreign state, they used an onion routing server farm that stripped all the OCI header and footer information as it bounced around the intranet the onion routers used, and thus there was nothing left to identify the bits that made up the package.

Some reading if you are truly interested.

OSI model - Wikipedia

Darknet - Wikipedia

Onion routing - Wikipedia
What precisely did they hack?????

Nobody has even bothered mentioning anything other than emails. We already know that had nothing to do with Russia. Hillary’s media just refuses to admit the truth. It has nothing to do with election day vote totals. They lump emails in with some imaginary fantasy about Russian hackers changing vote counts. After the recount blew up in their faces they're trying to delegitimize Trump's presidency with false innuendo.

It's telling that one of the loudest voices Whinging About The Hacked Election is John Podesta. The revelations from his sordid email record were some of the worst this election cycle. He's using this as a BIG SQUIRREL in order to distract attention from his lack of email security contributing so greatly to the Fall of The House of Clinton.
Yep......Poor Johnny Podesta.
 
The Clinton campaign started this Russian swaying our election BS way back when Trump first said if elected he would talk to Putin and work with Russia to take out Isis. Back then the Clinton people picked up on that statement and put Putin and Russia on the hacker list working with wiki links just in case the election were close enough to use the hacking to swing it in Hillary's favor.

Little did they know Trump would win so big that their sinister plan could not work. Even a recount is a waste of time and they know it but are trying it anyway.


It's all about undermining the Trump win and his presidency.
It won't work, the people are too smart for that. In response I would have Sessions drawing up plans for an investigation into the Clinton Foundation. But I would keep it quiet until Obama is away from his pardon pen. We all know the Hildabeast and Obama are behind this whole thing. Let her have it Trump!
 
The office overseeing all 17 agencies of the US intelligence community apparently doubts the CIA’s assessment that Russia intervened to help Donald Trump win the presidential election, as Reuters reports anonymous officials saying the allegation won’t be endorsed.

Three unnamed officials from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) told Reuters on Monday that their agency does not dispute the CIA’s findings, yet it would not accept them either.

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," one of the officials told the news agency. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.”

Top US spy agency abstains on CIA assessment of Russian hack of 2016 election
Yeah they can't prove if the hacks were intended to hurt Hillary after her election, or hurt Hillary by costing her the election.

Therefore, according to Trump, the Russians were not involved in any hacking :rolleyes:

Ya forgot to subtract the 5 million non-citizen and other fraudulent votes for HRC, asswipe.
What? :cuckoo:

Yes sport don't pretend that HRC wasn't involved in election fraud right up to her demented crazy looking eyeballs.
 
The office overseeing all 17 agencies of the US intelligence community apparently doubts the CIA’s assessment that Russia intervened to help Donald Trump win the presidential election, as Reuters reports anonymous officials saying the allegation won’t be endorsed.

Three unnamed officials from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) told Reuters on Monday that their agency does not dispute the CIA’s findings, yet it would not accept them either.

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," one of the officials told the news agency. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.”

Top US spy agency abstains on CIA assessment of Russian hack of 2016 election
Yeah they can't prove if the hacks were intended to hurt Hillary after her election, or hurt Hillary by costing her the election.

Therefore, according to Trump, the Russians were not involved in any hacking :rolleyes:

Ya forgot to subtract the 5 million non-citizen and other fraudulent votes for HRC, asswipe.
What? :cuckoo:

Yes sport don't pretend that HRC wasn't involved in election fraud right up to her demented crazy looking eyeballs.

Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
 

Forum List

Back
Top