JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,543
- 280
frankly I'd rather have a bunch of Marxists running the SPA than a bunch of soulless Republicans who put business and profit above everything else, including human health.We do not need a bunch of Marxists in the EPA to pursue such remedy.You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.
The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer
Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.
- An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
- A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
- A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
- A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.
Two words; Respiratory Disease.
It's a fact the Respiratory Therapy industry can't keep up with the demand for Respiratory Therapist and Respiratory Deaths have been increasing by crazy numbers.
What's more important? Money or human lives.