WHY wasn't Obama Impeached for Refusing to Provide Ukraine Military Aid ?!?!?!?!?!?

[Contumacious]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

 

[G.T.]

Dude, putting allllll the laws and alllll the truths and falsehoods aside...


SURELY...


SURELY you can understand the difference between the two cases.

wtfff

 

[Crepitus]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

Do you really need this explained to you?

Ok, just once, for the hard of thinking:

President Obama was making a policy decision based on his interpretation of the situation. Nowi didn't agree with his policy decision, and neither did many folks in congress, but it was a policy decision. It's entirely legal and Constitutional to have policy disagreements.

dOnald tRump did not withhold the aid for policy reasons. He was trying to extort favors from the Ukrainian government. Nothing to do with policy. It is entirely illegal and unconstitutional to use the power of the office for personal gain.

Got it now?

 

[rightwinger]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

The reason he wasn’t impeached was because he did not demand a personal favor in return for military aid

 

[Stratford57]

And why Obama was not impeached for providing military aid to criminal Ukrainian officials who used it to kill civilians in my home country of Ukraine? Because that's who official Kiev was shelling in Donbass. There should be an International Military Tribunal judging Obama's and Soros' crimes in Ukraine.

 

[Contumacious]

Dude, putting allllll the laws and alllll the truths and falsehoods aside...


SURELY...


SURELY you can understand the difference between the two cases.

wtfff

Treaty With Ukraine On Mutual Legal Assistance In Criminal Matters


Shirley, I can't understand the difference.

,

 

[Contumacious]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

Do you really need this explained to you?

Ok, just once, for the hard of thinking:

President Obama was making a policy decision based on his interpretation of the situation. Nowi didn't agree with his policy decision, and neither did many folks in congress, but it was a policy decision. It's entirely legal and Constitutional to have policy disagreements.

dOnald tRump did not withhold the aid for policy reasons. He was trying to extort favors from the Ukrainian government. Nothing to do with policy. It is entirely illegal and unconstitutional to use the power of the office for personal gain.

Got it now?

So you do admit that Foreign Aid is subject to Presidential Discretion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.

 

[konradv]

Dude, putting allllll the laws and alllll the truths and falsehoods aside...SURELY...SURELY you can understand the difference between the two cases. wtfff

Unfortunately Trumpkins can only see what they want to see. Looking what's behind the "facts" being put out by administration flacks is beyond their aptitude.

 

[bendog]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

No matter how many question and exclamation marks you use, no one seriously beleives you are confused as to the differences.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

Simple, simple shit...He’s BLACK.

 

[Contumacious]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

The reason he wasn’t impeached was because he did not demand a personal favor in return for military aid

The Whistleblower Act did not, and could not, deprive the Prez of his 6th and 14th Amendments right to confront his accuser

.

 

[Contumacious]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

No matter how many question and exclamation marks you use, no one seriously beleives you are confused as to the differences.

Treaty With Ukraine On Mutual Legal Assistance In Criminal Matters


Shirley, I can't understand the difference.


Don't blame me if English Comprehension is not your forte.


.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

that question is simple as pie to answer.

Two reasons. ONE- presidents are above the law thats why NONE of them have EVER gone to jail even though most have committed crimes far worse than all the criminals on death row.

TWO-congress is corrupt and does not represent the people,only the bankers.

any other questions foe the day?

 

[Bleipriester]

And why Obama was not impeached for providing military aid to criminal Ukrainian officials who used it to kill civilians in my home country of Ukraine? Because that's who official Kiev was shelling in Donbass. There should be an International Military Tribunal judging Obama's and Soros' crimes in Ukraine.

The actual crime is that there are not enough victims. Impeach!
They have created a new trouble spot and want to fuel it.
Their mission: Make the European countries weaken each other.
Their tools: European puppet politicians.

The US looks unsatisfied but in reality, the champagne corks pop in Washington.

 

[Contumacious]

Dude, putting allllll the laws and alllll the truths and falsehoods aside...SURELY...SURELY you can understand the difference between the two cases. wtfff

Unfortunately Trumpkins can only see what they want to see. Looking what's behind the "facts" being put out by administration flacks is beyond their aptitude.

DEMO RATS TITANIC

.

 

[Dragonlady]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

I guess you didn't read the article you linked to because it went on to say:

Lawmakers who oppose sending weapons to Ukraine note that Washington could never send enough hardware for Ukraine to defeat Russian-backed forces militarily. And it is not clear that the Ukrainian military is sufficiently trained to make proper use of American weapons without substantial assistance by American military personnel, or that the weapons would not end up in enemy hands.

“If you’re playing chess with Russia you have to think two moves ahead,” said Senator Angus King, independent of Maine, who is among those lawmakers skeptical of providing arms. “I am afraid this could provoke a major East-West confrontation.”

Julia Osmolovskaya, the managing partner of the Institute of Negotiation Skills, a mediation group in Kiev, said Ukrainians were divided over the potential benefits of receiving weapons from the United States and the inherent risk of stoking further violence, and also perplexed by Washington’s mixed messages.

 

[Dragonlady]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

The reason he wasn’t impeached was because he did not demand a personal favor in return for military aid

The Whistleblower Act did not, and could not, deprive the Prez of his 6th and 14th Amendments right to confront his accuser

.

This isn't a criminal trial, so that doesn' need to happen. The AMERICAN PEOPLE are accusing Trump. Not one man.

 

[Crepitus]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

Do you really need this explained to you?

Ok, just once, for the hard of thinking:

President Obama was making a policy decision based on his interpretation of the situation. Nowi didn't agree with his policy decision, and neither did many folks in congress, but it was a policy decision. It's entirely legal and Constitutional to have policy disagreements.

dOnald tRump did not withhold the aid for policy reasons. He was trying to extort favors from the Ukrainian government. Nothing to do with policy. It is entirely illegal and unconstitutional to use the power of the office for personal gain.

Got it now?

So you do admit that Foreign Aid is subject to Presidential Discretion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.

You cannot really be this stupid.

This has to be an act.

 

[Hellbilly]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

Simple, simple shit...He’s BLACK.

He’s biracial.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Contumacious]

Defying Obama, Many in Congress Press to Arm Ukraine

WASHINGTON — With the peace process stalled and violence escalating in Ukraine, a bipartisan coalition in Congress is defying President Obama and European allies by pressing the administration to provide weapons to the embattled nation.

The Senate has included provisions in its military policy bill to arm Ukraine with antiarmor systems, mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to aid in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. It would also prevent the administration from spending more than one half of $300 million in aid for Ukraine unless 20 percent is earmarked for offensive weapons. The House has passed a similar measure.

So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide lethal aid, fearing that it would only escalate the bloodshed and give President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a pretext for further incursions.

___________________________

WHY the double standard?

The reason he wasn’t impeached was because he did not demand a personal favor in return for military aid

The Whistleblower Act did not, and could not, deprive the Prez of his 6th and 14th Amendments right to confront his accuser

.

This isn't a criminal trial, so that doesn' need to happen. The AMERICAN PEOPLE are accusing Trump. Not one man.

The President has the right to confront an accuser in a civil or administrative proceeding pursuant to the 14A Due Process Clause.

.